patching...
Breaking: Update: Woman Struck by Vehicle and Killed is Identified »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Anti-Wall Street Demonstration Coming to Lehigh Valley

Occupy Together plans noon rally in Allentown on Monday

 

The Occupy Together movement will come to the Lehigh Valley with a noon rally scheduled for 7th and Hamilton streets in Allentown on Monday.

Occupy Together is a spin-off of the Occupy Wall Street protest. More than 700 anti-Wall Street protestors were arrested Saturday when they tried to cross the Brooklyn Bridge.

Occupy Together is a national effort to mobilize "99% [to] take action against the greed and corruption of the 1%," according to the movement's website. About 30 people have committed to attend the Allentown rally, according to the Occupy Allentown Facebook page.

There's a debate under way on the Facebook page about whether the protest will accomplish anything or is a waste of time and energy.

In addition to Facebook, Craigslist is being used by the event organizers to get the word out.

Related Topics: Occupy Allentown, Occupy Together, Rally, Recession, and Wall Street

Larry Delhagen

2:11 pm on Sunday, October 2, 2011

Laughing out loud! Sure, have a ball. You go right ahead and protest your little hearts out against those evil, capitalist banks. Heck, go protest every "big" that you don't like. "Big" oil, "Big" Pharmaceuticals. Big this, Big that. Meanwhile, government beauracracy, waste and corruption make the worst or the worst in the corporate world look like a Rotary club meeting, and you nitwits couldn't care less. Selective outrage directed at what you already are ideologically opposed to doesn't just smack of naivety and hypocrisy, it reeks. We have over 9% unemplyment. If it was up to this crowd, it would be 50%. And ironically, they'd blame that on "Wall Street" too.

Steve

6:50 pm on Sunday, October 2, 2011

The NYC attempt to rally against Wall Street is nothing but a bunch of young unemployed children who have not one bit of financial sense in their young minds. I originally thought the idea of having a rally in the Lehigh Valley might big good for business at the restaurants but truthfullly mommy will probably brown bad lunch for the kiddies. ! Have fun kids..... don't forget....mommy wants the car home before 8 !

John Galt

7:04 pm on Sunday, October 2, 2011

Capitalism demands the best of every man, his rationality, and rewards him accordingly. It leaves every man free to choose the work he likes, to specialize in it, to trade his product for the products of others, and to go as far on the road of achievement as his ability and ambition will carry him.

The moral justification of capitalism does not lie in the altruist claim that it represents the best way to achieve 'the common good.' It is true that capitalism does (if that catch-phrase has any meaning) but this is merely a secondary consequence. The moral justification for capitalism lies in the fact that it is the only system consonant with man's rational nature, that it protects man's survival qua man, and that its ruling principle is: justice. Capitalism is the only system that can make freedom, individuality, and the pursuit of values possible in practice.

So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of all money?

Comment_arrow

Robert Trotner

1:42 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

I associate myself 100% with your remarks. Government is bad but Wall Street is good??? C'mon. Wall Street is just one superscandal after another, one superscam after another, one bailout after another. Let's agree that both government and Wall Street need a lesson in Democracy and honesty. Our Local Coffee Party will have a meeting/rally at Hava Java Coffeehouse this Sunday 7 -7:30 PM to present a Petition dealing with Cong Dent and his special interest money. The Petition will be presented personally by our delegation to Cong Dent in Washington DC on Monday, October 31. The preceding Saturday, October 29, on the Capitol Steps in Washington, DC we will have a huge rally against both evils: Enough is Enough/Rally to Restore Sanity II. All are welcome to sign the Petition and to present it to Cong Dent in Washington. Inexpensive transportation and lodging.

Comment_arrow

George

4:44 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

there is always some idiot who uses the John Galt name from that boring-ass book by Ayn Rand.

QED

8:44 am on Monday, October 3, 2011

There is plenty of greed and corruption to go around but these groups have no meaningful focus and are anti-productive. In fact, it is the lack of capitalism (monopolies and entities in cahoots with the legislators) rather than capitalism itself that causes corruption. Take for example subsidized green energy and monopolistic utilities. Government control, needed to prevent or control monopolies, morphs into ongoing corruption by the government. This is a real problem but not really a problem with capitalism per se. The activists may mean well but without more focus are truly anti-productive. And they need to get an education in economics to understand that capitalism is the solution not the problem.

Chris Miller

9:47 am on Monday, October 3, 2011

These are thhe children of the Hanoi Jane Fonda generation. Do not take them lighlty. They are being directed by the progressives in our colleges. Sure some of them will go home bragging about things they supposedly caused to happen but keep in mind that we will see more Bill Ayers and Barack Obamas coming out of stuff like this. If you want to get a look at the intelligence of our youth take a look at today's Express-Times editorial on the States are failing at teaching Civil Rights history. The author, a graduate of Rutgers and a PhD candidate at Lehigh, has numerous historical errors and has simply twisted the history he is attempting to explain.

Joshua Miller

10:01 am on Monday, October 3, 2011

Wow. What a lot of conservatives read the Easton Patch. Who knew? I'm impressed with the massive protests. They are very much in the spirit of Thomas Jefferson. Wall Street has done great damage to working people in our country while making themselves ever wealthier. The rich get richer and the middle class & the poor get poorer. Social services & the arts & education get cut. I wish I could get to Allentown at noon or Manhattan today.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:43 am on Monday, October 3, 2011

Joshua
Would you please be so kind to explain how this display by the children of the Hanoi Jane generation is in the spirit of Thomas Jefferson. Please cite source and provide the example. Please don't attempt to compare it to the Boston Tea Party. You might also explain how Wall Street damaged the people. Did the brokers go out and pull people into their offices and force them to buy stocks and take gambles. I don't recall seeing or hearing that. Maybe you can elighten me. As to social services and education, well we have been pouring money down those rat holes for a long time. Are you aware of the fact that in PA we spent an average of 14K per student per year in public education. If by social services you are talking about welfare keep in mind that we have spent trillions on the so called needy since Johnson launched his Great Society program in 1964. You might want to spend some time getting those pesty little things called FACTS. By the way I am a retired, 32 years, history and government teacher, BA in History Moravian and Masters in Education via Eaststroudsburg Graduate School and the Commonwealth of PA

Comment_arrow

optimist

1:22 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

Wow Chris you sound like you are very concerned with wasted money on social services and protecting the integrity of banks and corporations. Do you have any of the same concern with giving mass subsidies to the oil industry? How about the tax payer money wasted on bailing out these banks? Any concern with spending billions as well as lives chasing weapons of mass destruction? Is it possible that deregulation led to many more problems that it solved such as the Gulf Oil Spill, the Enron debacle, the meltdown of the banks etc? Of course we should not say things like this about the "job creators" correct?

Jonathan Gerard

11:04 am on Monday, October 3, 2011

Josh Miller has a PhD from an Ivy League university, has taught at Berkeley and Princeton, is a published expert in his field (with more than twice as many publications as you have fingers and toes), and teaches government and history at one of our country's most highly respected colleges. He never speaks without facts.

Here's a fact you may have overlooked: the Wall Street banks have grown so large that they have been able to socialize their risk (making the public pay for their bad investments) while privatizing profit. Had the banks failed, all of our pensions would have gone down the toilet, so the government could not let them fail. But the banks have more power than Congress and were able to use some of the bailout money we gave them for obscene executive bonuses--with impunity. And they continue to use their power to undermine the Dodd-Simpson regulatory reforms passed by our democratically elected government. No wonder Josh and others with facts sympathize with the protesters. I see a lot of name-calling in this space. And I see a lot of sympathy for the Wall St. banks. They even have our Patch readers fooled.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

11:34 am on Monday, October 3, 2011

Mr. Gerard
What exactly were those bad investments? Were they the bad loans forced on the banks due to our government passing the Community Reinvestment Act? Were they the derivatives all complained about and yet I may have missed the folks who went to jail for that. Was it something that was done by the banks who were forced to take stimulus money and how about that money, meant for "shovel ready jobs" like fixing our infrastructure but ended up in the hands of the Unions like AFL-CIO and SEIU. I do not understand the executive bonuses complaint. This is still America and we can give such bonuses. But wasn't there a Bonus/Bank Czar who was suppose to monitor all of that and stop it.This is what the Obama Administration told us. And of course we all know how well we have been served by regulations from government agencies like the EPA. As to the growing size of the banks. we use to have a thing called the Glass-Steagall Act to prevent that. It was washed away by court decisions and congressmen but most importantly if was washed away because the American people were sound asleep.
As to Joshua Miller, I will stick with my original assessment. Princeton, former home of Woodrow Wislon, a major Progressive, and Berkley, know for out of the box liberalism, don't cut it with me. I am also not impressed with his supposed publications. Heck, publishers take anyone and put them in a magazine today. Let me guess, I could find him in Rolling Stone.

Comment_arrow

Carl Stevenson

11:42 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Rabbi Gerard,

Hanving graduated from and teaching at bastions of socialism/Marxism doesn't enhance Miller's credibility, it degrades it.

However, before you or anyone else gets the idea that I'm enamoured with or support the big banks and wall street firms, let me state that when money is created out of thin air to give to political supporters and cronies, corruption surely ensues (and has).

This has happened under both Rs and Ds and it is called corporatism/fascism.

What most people don't realize is that corporatism/fascism is a LEFTIST thing, not "right-wing." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_To_Serfdom

Salisbury Resident

11:13 am on Monday, October 3, 2011

The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
Thomas Jefferson

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

11:36 am on Monday, October 3, 2011

Thank you for that citation. Let's hope Mr. Gerard seet it.

Comment_arrow

Lower Mac Resident

9:01 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Everyone always seems to forget this quote, thanks for posting

Scott Bieber

12:29 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

Hey John Galt, the correct quote is the "the love of money is the root of all evil". And there is lots of money love on Wall Street. Greed and corruption exists on Wall Street as it does everywhere, but it has much greater impact leveraging billions and trilions. As for Larry, Terri, Steve and Chris, thank goodness the naive young people protest. It keeps us thinking. We establishment types have accepted the corrupt status quo. I hang with Steve Wagner and Joshua Miller. As for Chris Miller, you sound like a bitter old man. You still buy the Hanoi Jane mythology. 99 percent of us who opposed the Vietnam War did not like what she did either. Nothing was "forced" on the banks. But I agree that government is as corrupt as the investment banks. I also agree that the American public is asleep most of the time. If they were awake, Glass Steagall would still be in effect. And if they woke up now, there would be milions protesting Wall Street.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

4:09 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

Scott
Not a bitter old man at age 66, just ask my great grandson, I am perturbed by the fact that I was not wide awake on a lot of this stuff. I want to make sure that my son, grand kids and great grandkids learn how to avoid this in the future so it does not happen to them. As to what was forced on the bank you need to check the Carter and the Clinton administrations on the matter of the Community Reinvestment Act. It was real and it forced the banks to go to the bottom of the pool and society to get customers. Keep in mind that this was the era when we decided to allow banks and investment firms to merge. They had tried this in the days just before the Depression. That is when Glass-Steagall came into law. Over the decades it was chewed on until it finally disappeared. That changed when the Phil Gramm wrote and the Congress passed legislation that allowed for the merger of CitiBank and Travlers Insurance if my memory serve me correctly. That model for all intent allowed for the merger of compamies that in turn limits our choices and cost us more money and usually terrible service--see the ATT and T-Mobile. merger. That will leave us with ATT, Sprint, and Verizon. Can you just see you cell phone bill.

Scott Bieber

12:53 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

But don't think I am a commie. I also don't like the way the inefficient welfare state operates. And I do favor capitalism, market economy and profit motive because its roots lie in the great liberal tradition of individualism and it is the best engine of wealth creation . But I think the main problem with our capitalism is that it is not equally opportunistic. You need money to make money and most of the money is aggregating to the top of the pyramid. As for the poor and lazy who will aways be among us, ethically and according to all religious belief, we who have are obligated to take care of them. We do need more charity from the rich. And since they mostly hoard their wealth, society, via govt, has to tax them to spread the wealth. So be it. I don't know another solution.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

4:17 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

I agree with most of what you say but I believe that charitable giving is something you believe and do. This nation has shown time and again that we are the most charitable nation in the world. We can be proud of that. I personally believe we need to help our fellow man by teaching him how to fish not by giving him a fish.. As to the rich hoarding their wealth, why does anyone care what they do with their money. As long as it is legal, they can hide it in the ground and never spend it. We have tried to spread the weatlth as has Russia, China and other communist nations. It is the philosophy of John Maynard Keynes and it never works.

Rosemary B

1:47 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

From their own website
"Occupy Wall Street is leaderless resistance movement with people of many colors, genders and political persuasions. The one thing we all have in common is that We Are The 99% that will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%. We are using the revolutionary Arab Spring tactic to achieve our ends and encourage the use of nonviolence to maximize the safety of all participants."

This is the most vague and goal-less and meaningless cause I could ever imagine! Can't believe so much time and effort is going into it.

Comment_arrow

Lower Mac Resident

9:03 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

A bunch of college hippies that don't want to work for a living, to put it in simple terms

Chris Miller

3:50 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

Wayne
I get upset when government continues to pick my pocket by passing programs to assist those in what is now a generational entitlement program. I have worked all my life starting with mowing yards, washing and waxing cars, painting, teaching, and working as a realtor. I work because I believe it gives your live value. Entitlement programs do not do that. As to the oil companies, you might recall that the oil companies in front of a congressional committee noted that said subsidies were tax breaks written into the tax code by Congress. As for spending money on WMDs, what would you have done. I would have gathered info on what I was hearing, present it to Congress, and ask them for a declaration of war. Think how that might have affected the game. How about Obama and his role in Libya? Why are we there? As for the spill in the Gulf, I view it as an accident as was the case in Alaska. I also belive that we should be drilling on land not the waterways. What regulation could you have put into place that would have stopped that? Was no one watching what was going on.in the Gulf and if so why was that the case? As for the bank melt downs who is really in charge at the banks. Have you looked at the coziness of the banks and the government. If the derivatives were evil why were they allowed. Why were banks forced to make bad loans to individuals with no credit and in some cases no job.

Comment_arrow

optimist

9:29 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

So in the end you are verty upset about the government picking your pocket for social welfare and everything else seems to have a good explanation. Welfare for citiizens bad. Welfare for corporations, banks and the military industrial complex ok. Well as long as Congress has wiritten it into the tax code hey, why not?

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

11:27 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

I don't think "welfare/bailouts" for Corporations is good either! If a company cannot make it or has been driven to it's knees or out of this country by unions then it should go under and leave room for another better run company to take its place. But too many entitlement programs will lead to a lazy society of people who feel entitled. Teach a man to fish, don't just give a man a fish.

Chris Heller

8:01 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

Let me comment once again, Terri. You call us druggies and losers. I take offense at that. I am neither. Did you come out to talk to any of us? Do you feel that you can sit back and make these generalities without having the decency to check out the facts?

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:39 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Had I come out to talk to you what would you have to say? Your day might be better spent looking for a job instead of hanging around with people who want the government to become their mommy and daddy. Of course the health care bill is allowing young adults to stay home until 26. When are you guys planning to grow up and when will you realize that the government is not you mommy much less your daddy.You sound like a guy who is normally ambitious and now a bit down on your luck. I would suggest you walk into some places and ask if they are hiring. Now is not the time to be picky. I would wager that if you got into places you will find work.

Comment_arrow

Lower Mac Resident

9:05 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Why would anyone come out to talk to any of you, I see enough in the media when people try to talk to you, you use language that I would never use, you have no basis to your argument, and most of you could use a shower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DnGcUnoNa5Q

Comment_arrow

Wayne Schissler

10:30 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

I have stopped by and talked, on the first day of the "occupation". They asked if I would like to hold a sign and I politely declined, introduced myself as one of those horrible Tea Party members and had a few interesting conversations with the occupiers. It was all good & civil.

I detected no drugs or nasty smells. Maybe at the NYC one there is, since it's a 24/7 camp-out, but not at Allentown. So everyone who is harping on that is doing themselves a big disservice.

And I would recommend anyone who wants to visit them to go right ahead. Or you can continue to hurl insults at each other here and get nowhere.

Chris Heller

8:29 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

The whining appears to be coming from you. You have not addressed the points that I am making. I don't want your money but I would like to see a tax system that is fair and not all the loopholes for business. Get to work??? I have been looking for work since being laid off. There is nothing out there except minimum wage jobs that don't come close to my old salary. The revolution is coming!!!

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:46 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

This is what I mean, you may have to take a job that pays less. Have any of us felt that we are getting what we are worth. I am a retired teacher and I still work as a realtor. I am very familiar with what is going on in the economy. Your answer is not big brother government that is willing to increase your woes by printing more money that will in turn cause monstrous inflation. Getting better and improving your life is all in your hands. It always has been. I wish you success.

Carter Lansing

8:54 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

If you can forgive Terri's poor grammar, flawed punctuation and slowly deteriorating logic, I think she has a point. The Democrats are just as much to blame as anyone else for this mess. Had they voted to reinstitute the regulations in Glass-Steagal, we would be in a much better place. But, Wall Street has purchased our political system outright and both parties are tainted. Which, is a large part of the frustration felt by those doing the protesting. Both sides have, in fact, screwed us and left us without any way to redress our grievances. Oh, except to take to the streets in protest.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:04 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Don't blame the government or Wall Street. We know they are in cahoots and have been since the time of Teddy Roosevelt that so called conservative who layed the ground work for cronyism. If you want to lay the blame on someone let me tell you what I tell others, look in the morror.I do that every day. We have a represetative republic as our form of government. That means that we tell our elected representatives what to do and what powers they have. We seem to have forgotten that because we feel the need to have a mommy and daddy. Get over it. It is tough to grow up and become a responsible adult. Responsible adults pay attention to their representatives and when they are bad we look for better people. It is not easy to maintain our form of government because you must be active in it. Did the Founders simply write the documents and then go home, hardly. As to the Wall Streeters keep in mind that there is recourse there in the form of stock holders who can make changes. How many have opted to do that? How many have gone to the meetings to protest the bonuses? I can't recall hearing any of that? The happy days are over. Stop your stupid, ineffective and down right silly protest. Start reading the history of your nation. Pick up and read "The Five Thousand Year Leap" Buy the edition with the Farmer on the cover. Stop blaming the fools for your problems. You are responsible for you.

Wayne Schissler

9:38 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

I stopped by and chatted with the Occupy Allentown forces after work today. Good people who have many of the same concerns as the rest of us but I don't agree with their solutions. They're worried about gov't being co-opted by the rich, politicians being bought. The solution, many of them think, is to publicly fiance elections. That's just another layer of gov't (incumbent) control. Instead, how about a government that doesn't pick the winners and losers through unequal enforcement, subsidies, bailouts, and regulations that only the largest companies can afford. A constitutional government that cannot do these things does not have politicians bought to provide them. Fix the root of the problem, not add to it.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:06 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Wayne
Out there peeling back the oninon layer one at a time. This group needs to get its act together and stop the moaning

High-On-Lehigh

9:52 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

LISTEN to the LINK below, starting at about the "3:00" marker, to find out what is the central grievance. It is basically the Citizens United ruling by the Supreme Court, which urgently needs to be squashed by a constitutional amendment.
http://www.npr.org/2011/10/03/141019162/wall-street-protests-spread-to-other-cities

Comment_arrow

Wayne Schissler

10:37 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

RE: Citizens United
Yes, only allow the "approved" groups to support candidates and lobby gov't. The unions, lawyers, etc, and special interests. There's plenty of special interests that are not corporations. Once again - a gov't that cannot pick the winners and losers - cannot subsidize, bailout or overly regulate in favor of the interests that buy their gov't influence will not be corrupted. The cure that you propose will only have the power brokers find different ways to influence.

High-On-Lehigh

11:15 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

So you are ok w/ the concept that corporations must be given the full constitutional rights and protections granted to all individual citizens, despite the facts that (1) corporations are far wealthier than individuals, (2) corporations by charter must only have the interest of advancing their bottom lines (cannot have the interest of society at heart), and (3) corporations intrinsically do not fear punishment from their wrongdoing, since they cannot be jailed?

Comment_arrow

Wayne Schissler

11:26 pm on Monday, October 3, 2011

Associations, unions, etc are far wealthier than individuals, have only their interests at heart, cannot be jailed. Plus a corporation denied could just use an association to do the same thing. So you're OK with a band-aid approach when the obvious problem is a government that is allowed to pick the winners and losers. If a gov't could not do that through subsidies, bailouts, favored treatment and regulations there is no need for another layer of government controls you that desire. Unless you only want to silenced certain voices and let the gravy train flow the way you want it...

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:14 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Since their inception they have been treated as people and I do agree with your enumerated points. As to going to jail, keep in mind that they have a far worse punishment, they have to come before a congressional committee to be publicly berated and then go out to lunch so they can be plucked for election funds by the inquisitors.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:23 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Demonize the Occupyers as drug-induced losers, while genuflect before the greedy, sky-is-the-limit moneymen who seem to hunger for more. Typical uninformed protestations from the right. This movement, just like the Tea Party, could snowball once it gets traction. I can only sit by and observe, but I wish Wall Street comes to its senses and give some jobs for the unemployed, being job creators as they are known to be. This is all the Occupyers are trying to convey.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

9:31 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

why is it some people from the left cannot debate without resorting to insults?

Anyway, I will be amazed if this snowballs like the Tea Party. The Tea Party goals are very clear and this movements goals are EXTREMELY vague, except for The goal of "You have more and I want it".

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

11:05 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

You are a true progressive/communist. Your group will not grow like the Tea Party because you have children on the street protesting. Those in the Tea Party are grownups. Wall Street is not in the business of handing out jobs. One has to be properly educated and theh apply on the job. Protesting in the streets will not get you a job.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:30 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

I am afraid I overllooked your statement about Wall Street "give some jobs" Are you even aware of the fact that you must qualify for the job and it isn't easy to do that on Wall Street. You earn a job and then someone will hire you.

Rosemary B

9:28 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Amazing how they protest Wall Street who gives most of their money to elect DEMOCRATS! Maybe all those protesters should start looking for a new party to join!

Comment_arrow

optimist

9:43 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

That is exactly what the teap party should do: Form a new party!

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

11:30 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Forming a new party would not work cause it would split the Republican/Conservative vote. Would be great for the Dems!

Rosemary B

10:32 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

And, if you are upset about the government tax loopholes for corporations why don't you protest in Washington? Why protest at Wall St and other towns. Though this movement fascinates me I do haven trouble understanding it.

optimist

10:47 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

I'll keep that in mind. Some jobs created by government that has not gone away: Superintendent of schools, Vice President, Secretary of State, Ambassabdor to Japan etc etc etc.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

11:55 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

But, because they are paid for by taxpayers, those jobs do not create any true wealth. You constantly need to drain the taxpayer to pay the government workers.

Comment_arrow

optimist

8:40 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

The statement being contested was as follows: The government does not create jobs. I never said a government creates wealth.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

7:49 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Wayne, what is the point of creating jobs if it does not improve the economy? If it is still a drain on the Taxpayers and on Society? You are just being argumentative. We are looking for real solutions here and government jobs are not it..

Chris Miller

11:46 am on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Wayne
As is the case with many of the uninformed you have never been to a Tea Party meeting. Keep in mind that these groups do vary on issues. As to Americans paying more what would you expect with a nation that is full of regulations. The governent does not create jobs they hire people to fill slots. They engage in baseline budgeting and printing money. That increases our cost of living. More troublsome is that the government has become less interested in creating policies that will encourage job creations. One large example is Obamacare. Businesses are holding on to their money because they don't have all the costs in front of them. If you are truly interested in making change let's discuss cutting the campaign season for both the primary and national elections. Let's have a national primary or divide it up into 4 primary voting days in April. Let's allow campaigning for the primary season in March. No campaigning over the summer. Pick up campaigning at the end of September and end it the week before the election. How about politicians must raise money in their district and in the case of senators in their state. No outside funds. Let's consider going back to appointing our US Senators. As to the so called balanced budget, I would remind you that unless we are including the off the books items we have not and will not have a balanced budget. Too finsh this off let's agree that we are going to emphasize personal responsibility and both community and individual charity.

Terri Simpson

12:06 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

A great book to read is called The forgotten man. The real truth about the great Depression

Rosemary B

12:08 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

We could also lower the Corporate Tax Rate so that we are not an unattractive country to do business in. This would help to create jobs that truly will help create wealth and improve our economy, unlike the stimulus package.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/03/business/economy/03rates.html

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

4:26 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Thanks for the post and the link. Could not believe the Times would print this.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

3:14 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

I have witnessed some Tea Party rallies and saw people carrying guns, heckling speakers, stomped on a protester's head...I don't see those as adult behavior. Now, let's see those filthy rich Wall Street kind hire unemployed people instead of looking for more ways to rip the poor and middle classs some more. By the way, I just cancelled my account with Bank of America which can't seem to stop itself from gouging us further. Now people wonder why there are protesters in the streets. And I am called a communist. I am not anti-capitalism; I have money invested in the market. I am just asking for fairness. These guys can't be happy unless they insult people.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

4:23 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

I want you to tell me where you saw those things being done by Tea Parties. You need to tell us right now. Because you, sir, are a liar.I listen to the news from early in the morning when I get up and I watch until I go to bed in the evening. If what you have said were true I would know about it. So fess up Wilfredo if that is really your name. And if indeed you have lied do all of us a favor and do not show up at the Patch again.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

7:58 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Wilfredo, I would also like you to cite exactly when and where you personally saw these things at a Tea Party event. You can't go around saying these things without backing them up and not expect some backlash. If you are talking YouTube, their are plenty of video showing Tea Partiers BEING ATTACKED BY UNION THUGS! Is that an example of "adult behavior"? Why are you not upset about that? I am sick to death of it being OK when Liberals do things and major crimes when Republicans or Conservatives even open their mouths!

I have not banked with Bank of America for years. Their greed was evident when the continued to charge me fees (and expected me to pay them!) on a closed account years ago! We all need to vote with our pocketbooks and not do business with places we don't agree with!

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:57 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Wilfredo
Keep in mind that people with the proper CCW license are able to carry guns. This is found in the Bill of Rights under the Second Amendment. The hecklers you mention in many cases were Tea Party members asking their representatives questions and take a look sometime at what their representatives said particularly Pete Stark from California. Take a look at Maxine Waters who stated she wants to take over the companies in America. I have read the demands of the group you are supporting and your demands have been posted on this blog. And while you hand out all this blather you fail to recognize the real danger facing us from the left and radical Islam. If I sound a trifle irritated it is because I have seen you useful idiots, Lenin's term not mine, over and over again trying to establish a permanet government that is nothing but a nanny state dedicated to caring for you. Now go educate yourself and get a job.

Comment_arrow

Lower Mac Resident

9:21 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Pretty much every tea party movement where anyone was there with a gun was someone from the left trying to make the tea party look bad.....you were probably one of them

Carter Lansing

7:02 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

I am so tired of the sanctimonious spin that the Teafolk put on history. They reminisce about good ole days that never were. They would have us believe that sending 14 year-old boys into mine shafts or letting 12 year-old girls get mangled in horrific industrial accidents somehow contributed to a sense of national character. I, for one, think the rampant racism, sexism and blatant disregard for safety or the environment are scars upon our country and I would NOT like to see us go back there. It is important to have a perspective on history. That is true. And many of the protesters lack that, but so does the Tea Party. For example, many of the protesters have equated themselves with the Arab Spring movement which was a revolution against violent dictators...do we have that here? Hardly. The Tea Party likes to refer to Obama as a tyrant. Really? By what definition? Sounds like both sides need to get down of the soap boxes and pick up a history book. Every freedom we have was won by struggle. There is no Freedom Fairy that drips Liberty down on our heads. And if you'll indulge the extended metaphor, there is no Troll stealing it from us either. This is folklore.

Comment_arrow

Wayne Schissler

7:30 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

You do realize you sound very sanctimonious while preaching to others about their sanctimoniousness, right?

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:03 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

I am a proud Conservative and I agree with what the Tea Party is fighting far and I would NEVER WANT THE RETURN OF CHILD LABOR or racism or sexism or reasonable safety and environmental regulations! And I don't know of anyone who does. Please stop spreading lies like this.

Comment_arrow

Lower Mac Resident

9:22 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Rosemary, they don't have a clue, they only thing the can do is spread lies

optimist

8:50 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

I guess my point and problem with the tea party and the right wing in general can be summed up in the following statment: The right wing does nothing to combat the most wasteful and pathetic of government spending but complains about all spending when it seems to benefit the most vulnerable. Nothing is said about corporate welfare, the insane amount of military spending, foreign aid to counries that hate us, nation building in Iraq in Afghanistan are you kidding me!
http://www.warresisters.org/pages/piechart.htm
If these supposed fiscal conservatives would speak up about any of this I may consider joining. However, after witnessing the Bush Presidency and present trends of those on the right, I will never vote Republican again.

Comment_arrow

Carter Lansing

9:23 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

You make a good point Wayne. I find it more than ironic that the Conservatives have waited until now to voice all this concern. And that it only seems to apply to things that don't directly benefit them. Considering that most of the reforms they are pushing for are designed to benefit those who supposedly need no handouts. Again, the business interests are the ones whining about too much regulation and taxes are too high...I thought these were the Rugged Individualists who were supposed to be able to overcome any obstacle and build industry from the mere sweat off their brow...

Comment_arrow

Wayne Schissler

9:48 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Wayne, we have Tea Party members that are saying exactly the same things you are saying. And you say that nothing is being said about corporate welfare? I do not know a single Tea Party member that approves of it!

You would feel right at home with our "libertarian wing". Oh, and Carter - they had voiced these concerns you speak of decades ago.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:24 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Most Conservatives I know have always objected to foreign aid to countries that hate us and Corporate bailouts/welfare. I'm thinking you don't know enough real conservatives.

Comment_arrow

careless fills

2:28 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Wayne, I agree. Many Libertarian principles are the same as those promoted by Liberals and others are objectionable to most Cnservatives. I find that most of the things that I dislike about both the Conservative and Liberal orthodoxies are opposed by the Liberterians, and many of the things I like about either the Conservative or Liberal orthodoxies are included in he LIbertarian. It's almost like instead of right and left, it's all a big circle and the Liberterian view is at high noon. The only question is whether the Occupy people share enough with the Liberterians to make it work, or are they at 6 o'clock? Time will tell, but both groups may share some values!

Chris Miller

9:24 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

No Carter I do know you. I have seen you coming for years. But what is it that you have done to better you country or is it your goal to bring anarchy? By the way the path to success has not changed al that much

Comment_arrow

Carter Lansing

9:38 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

My goal is to find solutions to actual problems. You don't know me. You don't know what I do for my community. So you might reconsider spewing any more garbage. Personal attacks like that are, I understand, not welcome on this site.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:32 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

FYI, the Tea Parties and Conservatives goal is to find real solutions also. We just want to try a different way to achieve that..

Carter Lansing

9:26 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Terri, would you please start making sense? It would be helpful if your words were actually connected into coherent thoughts by using punctuation and grammar. Or is that simply the Socialist Department of Education telling you how to think?

Chris Miller

9:57 pm on Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Wayne
Exsctly how many gazillions would you like the government to spend? We are trillions of dollars in debt. In PA we spend 13k per student per year for their education. We gave millions to a solar power plant that built the panels for $6 and sold them for $3.The person in the White House knew this. I could go on but I would run out of charcters Wake up

optimist

5:35 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Are you interested in cutting defense, subsiddies to the oil companies, and foreign aid to countries that hate us? I know the tea party does not want to spend money on education and other unworthy causes.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:03 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

No I am not interestd in cutting the defense budget. As for the oil companies, are you ready to allow the drilling of oil on our land, off our shores, in the oil shale and sands land. Solar and wind is not going to cut it. I would have taken monetray aid away from those who do not like us a long time ago particularly those nations in Europe who built there so called success under our nuclear umbrella. George Washington, after all had settled, wanted this nation to grow and become strong. He believed that we needed to become stong enough that we could pick our friends. He also believed in diplomacy and trade with other nations and putting American exceptionalism on display serving as an example for other nations to the point that they would model themselves after us. He did not believe and neither do I, in nation building. As to your comments on the tea party, like me they want more bang for fewer bucks. PA spends on average 13K per year on education. That is $169K for K-12 education and that is growing. Do you believe that we are getting what we pay for. At that rate every kid should be in Harvard. Do I believe in giving money to unworthy causes, no. Do I believe in giving money to worthy causes and individuals, yes I do. Should the government do it? No. Why not? Have you ever seen what happens to a charity that takes government money particularly the exec's salary. You need to do you homework.

Comment_arrow

Wayne Schissler

10:24 pm on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

First, the crack about education and other "unworthy" causes. We managed to put a man on the moon without a federal Department of Education - are we any brighter now?. How is the Energy Department doing, are we any better off since it was created 30 years ago? We are not anti-worthry causes, we are for constitutional restraint. All these areas that the federal government intrudes into are ripe for the sort of corruption that the occupy forces are concerned about. Instead of another layer of government control that they desire why not take away the power that they have to subsidize and overly regulate. Yes, the Tea Party is against corporate welfare. Period. That is unanimous.

As for the military, it is constitutional unlike the other "worthy causes" (which do just fine with local control). But yes, unlike my friend Chris (who is not a Tea Party member) I believe there can be some cutting done in ALL areas of government. The money isn't there and many of the countries are ungrateful. We in the TP do not all agree on this matter, or how much - but like I said above we have a "libertarian wing" that has been consistent on this and other constitutional matters for decades, not just for this administration.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:26 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Mr. Chris Miller
Now I am called a liar...But who the hell are you to censor my opinions here on the Patch?..If you can't debate rationally, maybe you should get off the page...The images shown on evening TV broadcasts were evident for all to see, unless you see only what you want to see..You can call me and others names if that makes you happy but that doesn't make you a better person...For my part, I'll not stoop to your level of arrogance...I am not going to tell you what to do...I am not going personal with anybody...I'll just say what I think of current events...This is a free country...Do what ever you want within bounds of decency...Now, about the Occupyers, I mentioned earlier that this movement is indeeed getting traction because we now see similar sit-ins in other cities...These groups cannot be all drug-induced losers, as some of you suggested,..These are not communists either, as you, Chris called them...They are just part of the disgruntled individuals who can't take Wall Street abuse anymore, just as the tea partyers complained about big government...Free country, remember?..We have rights and we don't have to cower to name calling.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

9:07 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Wilfredo, Do you see only what you want to see? There are just as many, probably more, minutes of footage of Tea Partiers being harrassed and attacked by Liberals and Union thugs. Why no outrage over that? None of us are perfect and their are crazies and ignoramuses in every movement.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:43 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Wilfredo
So let me understand this. Telling you to tell the truth and asking where you saw the stuff you talked about in your initial post makes me the censor of you commets. How is that. When this turns into a violent affair on the part of your orgamization i want you to remember what you have said in your posts. They are more then disgruntled individuals. And you. well you can go on getting fleeced by the big government boys in both parties in DC.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:38 am on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Rosemary
Thank you for the update on those old goodies--FDR's New Deal and Karl Marx';s Communist Manifesto

optimist

4:37 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011

Oh my goodness Communism! Now everybody should be trembling because the C word has been tossed into the discussion. Joe McCarthy would be so proud! Do you have a list of Communists in the government? Let me guess, Obama is at the head of the list?

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

11:32 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011

Do you honestly think this is not a threat to us. Have you seen the news bit by Roseann Barr who wants to bring back the guillotine and she has a list. Do you know the difference between the American and French Revolutions. Have you read John Locke. Are you aware of the fact that democracy, small d, will end up in anarchy. Do you know that Joe McCarthy for all intents and purposes has been exonerated due to the inforamtion that came out of Russia's KGB under Yeltsin. Actually I don't think Obama is smart enough to lead any movement. He gets weary a few years into the game.

Comment_arrow

optimist

2:10 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Joe McCarthy has been exonerated???? I'm sure Glen Beck would agree. Yes, communists did manage to infiltrate the United States government and rob atomic secrets, engage in espionage and things of that nature. Joe McCarthy simply lied about lists of people to gain political significance. " I hold here a list of 205 Communists working in the state department" (lie). He was a liar and a drunk and unworthy of being a Senator. He was correctly censored by his peers in the Senate. In the meantime, McCarthy and others like him, ruined the career of mostly innocent Americans through accusations and unproven allegations. He was an embarressment and I think it's despicable that the right is trying to resurrect him. I'm glad the United States of America stood up against Stalinist Russia during the cold war and I believe Truman was correct in his poicy of containment. Throwing the C word around in modern American political debates about taxes, health care public education etc. is shameful.

Comment_arrow

Carl Stevenson

11:56 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Joe McCarthy was correct. The Russian cables decrypts by th Venona Project proved he was right about paid communist spies in very high places (and FDR and others knew it and protectd their "fellow travellers."
McCarthy was not guilty of the excesses often attributed to him by those who don't know the true history. He was a senator ... The HOUSE committee was the one guilty of some excesses.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:31 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011

Thugs, Rosemary B?..Maybe, like Mr. Chris Miller, you refuse to acknowledge TV news broadcasts...A Rand Paul admirer stomped on a lady's head to the pavement...That behavior is thuggish to me...And Mr. Miller, I am not making up those images I saw on TV...And that, sir, is the truth...What about your accusations of communism?..Is there truth to that?..These protesters are fed up with getting "fleeced" by your Corporate Wall Street buddies...Many of them, as I am, dabble in the markets and are not anti-capitalism...They see economic inequality...Let's concentrate our debate on this, instead of name calling...I could play the same game but I'd rather talk on FACTS, not innuendos...The FACT is Wall Street is occupied by many greedy entrepreneurs...Let's change this through PEACEFUL PROTESTS...I know what I am talking about so please don't tell me what to do.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

11:25 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011

Next time you might want to point out that this was a year ago. You might also want to show us and discuss the man who was beaten by union thugs. Do you think that I or any other conservative would do something like this much less support it.

Chris Miller

7:52 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011

Wilfredo
I have been listening to the news since 7AM. Where did the kicking of the head by a Ron Paul supporter occur? Nothing on the News. I did see and read that your fellow protesters wanted a pure democracy. That is insane. A pure democracy brings anarchy as was the case with the French Revolution. Under a pure democracy you have majority rule with absolutely no protection for the voice of the minority. Look at one of your supporters Roseann Barr who wants to brng back the guillotine the weapon used in the French revolution. Ms Barr is recommending an overthrow of our government. That is treason. You need to read some history because you are an illiterate when it comes to that topic

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

9:22 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvVBe2fDLc0&feature=related

unfortunately, Chris, it did happen. Oct 26 2010. It looks like she was trying to get to the candidate to give him some "award" and people might have perceived her as a threat to the candidate. It definitely went to far and was wrong. I am the first to admit that. As I have said before, their are crazies in every movement.

I have yet to see Wilfredo admit to the atrocities committed against tea party members by liberals and condemn them. All one needs to do is you tube it and such embarrassing behavior comes up, mostly by union thugs, that it makes me ashamed to be human.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJE5MqesHlw

About 1:53 into this one shows a woman in red treating a black tea partier in a very racist way. Their are many more graphic ones out there. A lot of them have the Union people saying that the only real workers are union workers!. These videos are scary. No one listening to each other. This class warfare being promoted by this administration is very dangerous.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:28 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Illiterate Mr. Miller?.You don't even know what communism is...You don't even realize that your ilk wants to drown the government in a bath tub hence, Anarchy!..You are an idiot, speaking of things you don't understand...Your fellow poster below (Rosemary B) saw the head-stomping event you said was a lie and I am a liar and you wanted me off the Patch (censorship by an idiot).

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:46 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Wilfredo, I actually have met Mr Miller. I was one of his grandson's cub scout leaders and I know for a fact that he is a very educated and thoughtful man who has taught high school level history, I believe, for many years and I am certain he has a better understanding of communism and the economy then most people. He is far from an idiot! And the LAST thing our "ilk' wants is Anarchy! Anarchy is not what limited (by the Constitution) Government would be. But it would give this economy some room to grow and raise ALL up. That is what I would like to see. A High tide raises all ships. Will all the ships get "income equality"? No, because that is not what capitalism is. But their will be more opportunity and incentive for those who are willing to work hard and take risks.

Still no condemnation of the Union Thug violence against the tea party from you?

Rosemary B

10:41 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011

I've heard some people are selling "Capitalism is Evil" T-shirts for $19 each! Oh, the irony...

Comment_arrow

Lower Mac Resident

9:13 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Capitalism is evil to them but they all walk around with blackberry's, iphones and laptops.....lol

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

9:42 am on Monday, October 17, 2011

Why is it that irony? What is irony is that the fastest growing economy is communist. The fastest growing middle class is communist. The best wireless, internet services are in socialistic countries where the middle class can purchase them. The adage that capitalist band together to be miserable, socialist band together to be happy seems clear from the messages posted here.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

9:01 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Ms. Simpson...You come in here and criticize bad English and yet you cannot construct a proper sentence by skipping your punctuation marks...I am sorry that I refuse to debate people with twisted logic (righties are angels, lefties are thugs rants), stating accusations that have no basis (I did not PERSONALLY witness the silliness of your friends, I saw them on TV...Please go back to the post which I wrote about it)...Obama machine paying protesters?..Did you forget about Freedom Works and the Koch Brothers bankrolling the righties' movement?

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

9:14 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Then why don't we just debate the issues backed up by facts? It seems that with the left being backed by Soros and MoveOn.org and the right being backed by Freedom Works and the Koch Brothers, this issue cancels each other out. Though, I would never be part of anything backed by Soros. Looking at his past, he is a man of questionable character and motives. I don't think lefties are thugs and rats. I think someone who beats someone up is a thug. and that people on the left are misguided and that the policies are not thought out to their natural conclusions.

Chris Miller

9:01 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Wilfredo,
If you take the time to look you will see that I noted the head stomping that you mentioned. She was a member of moveon.org, a Soros orginazation intent on over throwing our government. The individual who steped on her head was a Ron Paul suppoter and he should have spent time in jail after his trial Note this took place a year ago.
If you had studied histroy you would ultimately come to the conclusion that all of the "isms" are really the same whether it is Nazism, Facism, or Communism. They all end up as state controlled governments. They have different faces, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Mao, Pol Pot, you name it. But you might want to turn your attention to the caliphate of Islam. A very interesting thing has been happening in Islam in that the Sunnis and Shi'its are becoming bosom buddies. These two groups of Islam are supposedly enemies. You also might want to check on the impact of the Muslim Brotherhood, the guys who killed Sadat, and their presence here in the USA in large numbers. Did you know that they are in the porcess of setting up enclaves where they have already put Shira law into place in those communities. You just keeping trucking along blaming the banks who repaid their bill to the government--you knew that right? To GM who paid back the government. Your heard your president say that those shovel ready jobs weren't really shovel ready? So where, you might ask, did the money go? I am still waiting for answers to your initial posts

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

9:40 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Mr. Miller...I am glad you finally agree with what I said about the thug that stepped on a lady's head...You called me a liar then...Before ostracizing anybody, I suggest you fact check your rant...Ms Rosemary B told me that you are a decent person, but on what I see, is totally different or else you could've expressed an apology for calling me a liar...Finally, I am perplexed by your uncertainty about my initial post.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

9:55 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Still no acknowledgement or condemnation of thuggish behavior against Tea Partiers, Wilfredo?

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

9:25 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Rosemary B...Mr. Miller may be the genius you prefer to see him as, but the way he goes about his commentaries are way out of my comprehension...He labels the protesters as communists, resorts to name-calling (excrement, illiterate)...I find this behavior unfit for an educated man...Let us debate in a civilized manner and leave the gutter prose where it belongs...Also let us drop the "holier than thou" approach because this just muddies the conversation...Either side cannot claim full righteousness since both are guilty of commission.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

9:50 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

You said he was an "idiot" and did not know what communism is. I just wanted to assure you that he is far from an idiot and probably understands communism far more then most people. And I find that when people do debate in a civilized manner they are then accused of being holier then thou.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:14 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

I went to your second post and left you some information. I am still waiting for some answers from you as I noted in that post. I would be happy to debate you in a civilized manner but given some of you sentence structure, minor in English, I would suggest you come back in a year or two. Your don't want a debate you want to castigate people. If you and your ilk continue in this manner you are going to see more businesses leave this nation. Take a look at the medical field today. Doctors are leaving in droves. Don't change the corporate tax rate and businesses will go to Ireland and lots of other places. You and yours because of your lack of history refuse to look at our history and lean from it. Your new friends are now in New York calling for the death of hard working American particularly the police right now. They are also calling for the slaugter of the Jews. And you are supporting these guys. Tune into WAEB 790AM

Terri Simpson

9:35 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

God Bless anyone that wants to preserve the Constitution unlike Soros and the left that wants to destroy it.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

5:02 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

I have a client working on this. One of the thing tied to this mess is Farm Preservation. Just think, Our community official are collecting our money and gin=ving it to prosperous land owners and then those same officials pretty much take the land out of circulation. Another porblem on our shoulder. Can't you just imagine all of us living in Allentown. The Agenda 21 map does not have us living there.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

9:47 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Rosemary B...You may not be aware that the Koch Brothers are not themselves as clean as you might think...They are being looked into for their transactions with Iran...Let us wait and see what comes out of this...As I said, either side is without sin.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:01 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Wilfredo
I will wager that the Koch Brothers will come out of this cleaner then Eric Holder who has the blood of a Border Patrol Agent on his hands with Fast and Furious and Obama with the Solyndra mess. You just keep backing your heroes and I'll back mine. By the way Rosemary is a whole lot smarter then you.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

10:39 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Thank you Chris! Hope all is well with you and your family.

Chris Miller

10:57 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Rosemary
All is well. Liam is just a bit taller then me and the voice is deeper every day. He eats as though he has a 10,000BTU furnace in his belly but stays at a svelte 125lbs. Two great grand children, the boy walks that land as though it is all his at the age of almost 2 and the girl is absolutely gorgeous with dark blue eyes and black hair. I am more in awe of the work that God does as I look at those precious youngsters.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:58 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Rosemary \
Just want to let you know that I will be a member of the Nazareth School Board in January.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

3:34 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

So glad you guys are doing well! Adam is also doing well and playing football. Congrads on the school board election! I know you will add a good dose of knowledge and common sense to the board and their discussions.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

1:29 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Rosemary B...If Mr. Miller knows what communism is then he is not an idiot, but he called me a communist and he doesn't even know me...That's idiocy...(I'm sure you read what else he called me)...I don't have to define what the the word since he is a highly educated individual, but let me say this...I love the market, communists don't... I earn some money, and I lose some too...I am still waiting for his apology for calling me a liar, but with his kind of arrogance, I'm not sure I'm not gonna get it...This next lines are for Mr. Miller (there's no Reply button under his post)...Sir, I must identify myself as a naturalized U.S. citizen as you can discern from my strange looking name...Maybe that's a good excuse of writing in imperfect English, but I try my best to express myself...But that is an inappropriate order from you to tell me to skip a couple of years to learn to speak up....Now, on your earlier posts, unlike you, I never castigated anyone unless as a response to what was personally said about me (a communist, a liar, illiterate)...I can do this as well as you do, but this is not my way...Just as the Koch Brothers would come out clean, Mr Holder could, too...As far as Solyndra, I would not go there...After all the Bush administration initiated this transaction and Obama inherited it like the mess it left behind...As far as smarts go, I surrender to Ms. B...And oh, congratulations on your next job at the Nazareth School Board.

Terri Simpson

2:31 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Karen, wow had no idea that my personal life and my job is of much interest to you. Sounded almost like a nice threat. It's very typical insults and threats come from people that the truth stings. I am a proud American and love my country and yes I support the Tea-Party and I am not a coward . My job is none of your business and your concern is not wanted. We are speaking on a topic not my personal life so keep to the topic and not use subtle threats to shut people up.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

3:51 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Hey, Terri, This is why I don't use my last name on these things. People have criticized me for it, as if it makes my opinion of less value cause you don't know my last name! But I don't care. As we are witnessing, their are so many crazy people out there and you just never know what they will do. Would not want Roseann Barr and her guillotine to be able to find me! Good luck to you and don't let the haters get you down.

Patch_comments_icon

Josh Popichak

2:55 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

I'm glad everyone has a lot to say about this topic. That's great! Please, however, be civil and respectful toward one another -- regardless of your personal point of view. It's very easy to get carried away when discussing political issues, perhaps today more than ever. Thanks for the lively discourse.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:34 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Thanks, Mr. Josh...I couldn't have stated it any better...Name calling does not get us anywhere...Stay focussed on the topic at hand, CALMLY!..Thank you,Sir.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:30 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Eric Cantor's indictment of the Wall Street protesters: Dangerous mobs...A typical uninformed, obviously partisan commentary...I have not seen anyone in the crowd with a gun, but a bunch of guys were seen strutting their weapons around in Tea Party rallies...It's legal, but looked silly to me...Drugster Rush Limbaugh came up with human debris..."Let those without sin, cast the stones".

Comment_arrow

careless fills

10:27 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Was anyone shot at a Tea Party Rally? I accidentally stumbled into one in NJ when I was going to the library one Friday nite to use the wireless when I was visiting, and the main street was shut down with about two thousand people in front of the town hall, waiting for the T party bus and entourage. It was a interesting site, just like the Jane Fonda event I stumbled into in another city in the early 70's. The more recent tea party event was very civil with a motley crew hanging around with signs and listening to music even in a light drizzle some of the time. No guns or goons there.

Unlike the Black PAnther goons at a polling place in Phillie who intimidated people from voting, which Eric Holder gave a pass to instead of invoking provisions for procescution under the voters rights act of 1964!

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

4:56 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Wilfredo
The bunch of guys was one American black gentleman who was carrying his gun. Unless you have some place else that you saw them. You have not seen anyone with a gun yet but the fact is that the various majority of these folks are anti-second amendment and would not be a gun owner. Thus no surprise there. That of course would change if they were to survive an encounter with a criminal who had a gun. It is amazing how that can turn one into an American gun owner who regularly goes to the range

Rosemary B

9:46 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Even the people whose opinions I differ with might find this article and videos interesting. They are about Agenda 21 and they definitely tie in with "Income equality" and a lot of the things these protesters want. The Blonde in the second video down is a Liberal Democrat Lesbian addressing a Tea Party Group and you would be surprised how much they have in common! Would love to see The Patch do a piece on Agenda 21 and Redevelopment and how it is effecting the Lehigh Valley! Cause after you watch this you will realize that it is here as well...

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/is-the-soros-sponsored-agenda-21-a-hidden-plan-for-world-government-yes-only-it-is-not-hidden/

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

1:00 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

A similar protest will be forming in Easton...I'll be there to show my solidarity to the downtrodden among us...These protests are bringing attention to the severe economic inequality between the haves and the have-nots...Why is it so hard for many to understand that the majority of the citizens are suffering so much for no fault of their own, in defernce to Herman Cain who declared that its the poor guys' fault that they are where they are...Most of them have either been laid off or just coudn't find jobs...They are not asking for handouts, just fairness in this broken economic system...Hopefully, those in places of influence and power can see their pleas...It is so unfair to label them as dregs of society (human debris by drugster Rush Limbaugh, drug-induced losers, communists by some Patch bloggers)...The Tea Partyers made their wishes known, so why can't these sad folks do the same?

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

2:46 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

When is the Easton protest. I am still fascinated by this movement and am always interested in hearing what others have to say, even if I don't understand or agree with them.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

3:45 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

So have a whole list of wants have you read them. Pretty inane

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

1:14 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

(Why is there no Reply button on some of these posts?)...Anyway, for Rosemary B...I thought I mentioned earlier that either side are guilty of wrongdoings...This should end your query on this subject...Lastly, don't you think the Tea Partyers had all the time in the world to waste doing what they did?..Wall Streeters should be able to waste their time, too, don't you think?..You can't have monopoly in this democracy...Good for goose, good for gander.

Comment_arrow

careless fills

2:21 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

The tea party event that I stumbled into in NJ a couple of years ago was on a Friday evening, when few had to work and the downtown was empty (except for the library I was headed to). From what I heard at the time, I believe it was at the beginning of that movement and they were having a cross country bus tour that started out west and ended in Phillie.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

2:35 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Wilfredo, if you hit the reply button on the top post of the thread you want to reply to it will eventually put your post underneath the one you are probably trying to reply to. In this case, if you had hit the reply on Terry's, your reply would have landed under mine, unless someone else beat you to it and then it would be under theirs, but at least close to what you want to reply to. I know it can be confusing. I learned thru trial and error!

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

2:42 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

They Wall street protesters certainly have that right, and I would never say that they don't, but at some point are they not being inconsiderate staying there for days and days and wasting so much tax payer money? Especially since their cause has no real focus and then can come to no real conclusion? At what point do they pack up their bags and leave? When we finally have a Socialist Society/government? That might be awhile and I for one hope I never see that day

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

3:43 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Have you been in the sun a bit too long. If you are so interested in the Tea Party, and you aren't, why don't you attend one of their meetings. Most of them last about 2 hours. Most of them are involved in a variety of things in their community from county and city council meetings to school board matters. Look at the difference between them and your group. They joined together. They educated themselves by reading pertinent matters regarding government and the economy. They registered to vvote and convinced their neighbors to do the same. They put together political forums to get the candidates to explain their plan. They invited knowledgeable people who were experts on things like health care, school choice, and taxation as well as Agenda 21. And what have you and your colliagues done? Why you camp out just like those of the sixties many of whom did grow up and went to work at Wall Street or beecome members of Congress. And by the way stop calling our governmnent a democracy. It is a democratic form of government know as a Repesentative Republic. No other nation, no other people formed this type of government. I suggest you read "The 5000 Year Leap" then get back to us. You will find it at Barnes and Noble

Terri Simpson

1:39 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Still no condemnation for the destruction of property and beatings. It is a FACT not any tea-party person has been arrested in fact the people that pretend they are Tea-Party people get thrown out quickly Funny some want the truth to go away I am still waiting to see the tape where TP people urinate on property destroy and spew out disgusting hateful things cause millions in cleanup and broken windows graffiti. PLEASE prove me wrong show me a grandmother smoking dope and tea- party family's getting arrested.Tea- party people had jobs not like the trash you see the street. Prove me wrong and condemn bad behavior from your side I am more than willing to say if anyone spews hate or destroys property that claims to be a conservative is totally a stupid idiot and should go to jail just show me the tape. But not one person from the left has the decency to look into there own party and condemn bad behavior.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

2:46 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Rosemary B...Thanks, but please bear with me because I'll just go the long about way since I'm such a clutch in this newfangled technology...I tried your advice but no-can-do (Remember, you are smarter than I am).

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

3:22 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Rosemary B...I thought I read somewhere that protesters would be gathering in Easton on Sunday at the Scott Park...I tried to look for it everywhere but couldn't find it...Sorry, madam, but keep your eyes and ears open for announcement...I'll be doing the same.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

3:48 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

OK, now I got it...It was on the EastonPatch...The gathering will occur at 1 PM in Easton's Scott Park on Sunday.

Patch_comments_icon

Tom Coombe

3:40 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

There's a short story on easton.patch.com today linking to the group's Facebook page.

Chris Miller

5:05 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Wayne
You just might want to look into the new books on McCarty and the inforrmation from the old Soviet Union and KGB. Yes indeed he was an alcoholis but it did not stop him from coming up with information on communists in our government.

Comment_arrow

optimist

9:52 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Chris he mostly talked about supposed lists of communists that were total crap! He had no clue what he was talking about. The KGB has verified that they had contacts inside America. I don't doubt that. McCarthy did what he did 100% for political gain. By the way, belonging to a communist group or attending a communist meeting is protected under the Constiution. If they make any attempt to overthrow the government then they should go to jail. This drunkin liar created a witch hunt that destroyed people for no good reason. That is the truth despite what Glenn beck and the right want you to believe.

Terri Simpson

6:15 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Some ignore the facts because he would mean they would actual have to think about TRUTH it is not a tea-party theory it is factual and I'm laughing because the Messiah that is in favor of this protest is the biggest benefactor of wall street. Wall street is very liberal it's too funny!!!

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

8:12 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

To Mr Chris Miller, re:10/8 3:43 PM post:..Thanks but no thanks...I have heard from all kinds of media, conservative/liberal about this group and I refuse to go along with their (your) ideologies...You, sir, don't have the monopoly of altruistic endeavors...Me and my wife are also involved in community affairs (my wife ran for the school board but lost because of no "machine"..Yes, we vote, too), we are members of our township action committee, we are voracious readers/watchers of politics, we like LEPOCO (laugh if you like),..And you know what?..Since your Tea Party practically occupied the House of Representatives, the US economic rating was downgraded to AA instead of AAA...The public regards the House much less than your hated President Obama...So no, thank you...You can stick with your ilk and I'll stick with mine...That's Democracy isn't it?.. or as you prefer, Representative Republic...Please spare me this high falutin' "holier-than-thou, mine is better than yorn" attitude.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

8:53 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

It all comes out. LEPOCO is a communist/socialist front group that began by protesting the Vietnam War. Those guys called our troops baby killers and spit on them when they came home. Were did your wife run for school board? There usually aren't many candidates for that job. If you live in Bethlehem, a city that leans left, I would understand why she might loose. I don't believe you are voracious readers. If you were you would realize that there is a huge difference between a Democracy and a Representative Republic. You'd know that had you read about the Greeks and their Democracy--our Founding Fathers read it in Greek. Had you read our Constitution, you would have recognized a Representative Republic. Have you read the Declaration of Independence. Have you read Mein Kampf or Das Kapital? I have. The first by Hitler and the second by Marx and Engles. The Tea Party has 60 members in Congress. There are 535 members of Congress. Tea Party is not the majority, They probably are more learned then the rest of Congress. Why are you afraid of the Tea Party? Your litle buddy in the White House caused the credit rating to go down because of the huge deficit he has put into place a deficit greater then the one created by ALL THE PREVIOUS PRESIDENTS. Wake up and smell the roses and tell the truth. No one really cares if you are a member of LEPOCO. You and your pal Bernard Berg who claims to be both a priest and an Annapolis graduate. What people don't care for are sanctamonious liars

Chris Miller

8:31 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Wayne
You are still wrong about MCarthy. Do you research. On top of that the worse president is the second term of Jimmy Carter with the guy we now have in the White House. Carter will fall into the number 2 spot for all time worse president.

Comment_arrow

careless fills

10:11 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Chris, I'd rank Kennedy as being worse than Carter, but it's close.

Besides nearly getting us all blown up, most Kennedy did was a debacle. He failed to move on civil rights - it took leadership by Johnson (and the Republicans) to get the CRA of 64 and VRA of 65 passed. Add in the Bay of Pigs disaster where he abandoned the crew that were counting on his support. Add the Diem assaination in Viet Nam.

Finally, his sycophantic "historian" and PR guys Schlesinger and Sorenson both say (actually said, since they have idied) that if Kennedy was re-elected, there would have been no Viet Nam war, as we know it. They support their thesis with a claim that had a secret plan to get out after the 1964 election, but his own assasination, of course, prevented it, because he couldn't act until he ensured his own re-election. That analysis may be right, but just think about it. They basically are trying to build Kennedy up by saying that his own re-election was more important to him than doing what he believed was the right thing! Well stuff happens, and the Gulf of Tonkin incident, while occuring early during Johnson's watch before the 64 election happened, and the rest is history. Thanks JFK!

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

1:14 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Nancy, Really John Boehner caused our rating decline? Obama's massive spending had nothing to do with it? Really? Sure hope my NPR source is not considered a "tabloid" by you.

http://www.npr.org/2011/01/25/133211508/the-weekly-standard-obama-vs-bush-on-debt

optimist

9:09 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Ok research man tell wht you think you know. I've studied McCarthy and some of the information released by the Former Soviet Union. The lists he claimed he had were mostly crap. Many of the names were from people already investigated or being investigated. His accusations towards the military were especially crap. The army conducted their own investigation and no communist espionage was found at the Fort Monmouth military facility. He was correctly censured by the Senate and then he lost the next election. What makes him so corrrect now and such a hero? because their was a network of spies including the Rosenburgs and Whitaker Chambers? No kidding. Is it because their were plenty of spies and communists around? That does not exonerate this guy. He tossed the the word Communist around just like the right does today in ways that are inappropriate. So Chris please educte me. What great truths did Joe McCarthy bring forth that he was not given credit for? Why is history wrong about this guy? The fact that communists did try to help the Soviets insided this country does not excuse this drunkin liar. By the way, Truman who was a favorite target of McCarthy for a while, was correct in firing McCarthur.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

1:48 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Wayne
I believe I stated that McCarthy had a drinking problem. I also noted that you should pick up on some of the stuff that is out there pertaining to the files released by thhe KGB. McCarthy was not perfect but I see him as the man who caused us to take a look at the spying that was going on by the Soviets and their allies. McCarthy did put people on a list where some were and some were not spies and it did play havock on those citizens. But we have learned more since that time. As a nation, we are lackadaisical on spies in our nation to this day. Indeed we have had people in various agencies who spied for years before they were caught. I know Truman was not fond of him but Truman had Dexter White at Treasury. Ike was not fond of McCarthy and if I recall correctly he told him to knock it off during the election campaign. McCarthy was really looking at Ike as an ally. You did have communism going on in the CIO and in order to clean up their name they kicked out the bad guys and merged with the AF of L. McCarthy has been one of those figures who is damned by some and loved by others. As to MacArthur, great General who became a great egotist who forgot that Truman was the boss.

Comment_arrow

optimist

4:53 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

I can agree with a lot of this post. Not sure that McCarthy should be given credit for getting the authorities to look closer at espionage. As I said before, a lot of the names he brought up were already being investigated but perhaps he deserves some credit for awareness. I cannot forgive his lies about those in the military towards the end of his career. He tried to say that George Marshall was part of a communist conspiracy???? But ok we can agree on some things here.

Terri Simpson

9:44 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Disobedient protesters got pepper sprayed in DC at museum after being told no signs were allowed they held a guard got sprayed by another guard. Oh the gift keeps on giving. NYPD says the occupy Wall Street protesters are costing the city millions. Chickens coming home to roost. Oh poor Obama where shall he get his millions looks like his Wall street buddy's are not very happy.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

5:09 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Rosemary
Another generation that has allowed themselves to be fooled. What will we call this for the Movie--Hippie World II. I am waiting for Hanoi Jane to arrive or is that her dresses as Keith Oberman

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

5:30 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Terri
I will venture that the police will be a major force in NYC this week. Young people living in NYC are going to leave it. They can't tolertate this stuff as well as high rents and taxes. They are going to leave unless things change. NYC police and the mayor will see to that.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

9:59 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Mr. Genius Chris Miller...Where did you get that congressional ratio of House membership?..There are so many of them Mr. Boehner cowers under pressure...Result?..Dysfunctional congress, ergo, S&P blamed the downgrade on them...This never happened until your guys took over...You should be ashamed, as I am ashamed of the Vietnam War, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars...Such unnecessary loss of human lives and resources...Long live LEPOCO (No, I am not a member for personal reasons, but I like what they are doing)...I am not surprised of your vilification of them...I refuse to acknowledge your group who intends to "drown the government in a tub"...I need the government to regulate clumsy groups such as yours: no EPA (a Nixon environmental), let the banks and Wall Street go berserk and fleece the people some more (these guys got bailed out by our tax dollars and we get manure for gratitude), eliminate the unions, less cops, teachers, nurses needed, let the infrastructure collapse (poor Eisenhower), let's continue to pollute (hey, it;s money for the Koch Brothers and energy corporations, meanwhile we all choke to death on filthy environment)...Yes, Mr. Miller, this is the kind of existence you crave for...Thank goodness there are groups who disagree with your agenda.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

5:04 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

The 60 members suppoerted by the Tea Party was mentioned during the dispute over the debt ceiling. You were working and did not hear it. Now as to the lowering by S&P aI will cite the March 26, 2010 Washington Times. that Obama's 2011 budget will "generate nearly $10 trillion in cumulative budget deficits over the next 10 years." This will raise the Federal Debt "to 90 percent of the nation's economic output by 2020.", This means that for every dollar that comes into the Federal Government 90 cents will go to pay of the Obama debt. Do you think your credit rating might go into the tank under those circumstances. If you are so ashamed of these wars I hope you are writing Obama to tell him to bring the boys home from Iraq and Afghanistant as well as his new war in Libya. As to LEPOCO if you want to hook up with them be my guest. They are simply the peacenik hippies from the 60's. Please tell me how the banks and Wall Street have fleeced you. Look at www.democratsagainsunagenda21.com. Talk about a fleecing Keep in mind that Bush senior was in back of this as was Clinton. Check the Community Reinvestment Act if you want to talk fleecing. It sure as heck fleeced me because I am a realtor and we aren't moving houses.. Oh, one last think. I am a hunter, fisherman, father, grandfathher and great grandfather. Does it make sense to you that I or any human being would support dirty air and water. You guys need to get a new stick because that dog won't hunt any more.

Chris Miller

1:55 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Careliss fills
I cannot disagree with a word you say about Kennedy but to his credit he did lower the taxes. Carter almost brought down the nation with his economic plan. On another note I was a big fan of JFK and actually saw him in 1960 when he came to Moravian College. He looked liked the devil primarily because he had lost so much weight. A huge disappointment. I would put him at 3rd with Obama and Carter in 1st and 2nd mistake.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

3:32 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Rosemary B...Yes, that unidentified man's behavior is disgusting...No sane person would like to see that...But are there more of them?..In fact, a lady was seen doing hula hoops, but you purposely omitted that because it is uplifting at a moment like this to see but you see only what you want to see, the disgusting ones...Like Faux Fox News slogan Fair and Balanced...Once again (I hope this is the last time I tell you this): Neither side has the monopoly of righteousness...Have a nice day.

Chris Miller

5:27 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Nancy
As I told Wilfredo, I really don't care if your husband is a LEPOCO member. They are primarily the peacenik hippies of the '60s. So be it. As to the matter of congress and the debt ceiling issue, allow me a question how much money willl we have to spend to make you happy. In the Washington Post of March 26, 2010 they note that Obama's 2011 budget will "generate $10 trillion dollars in cumulative budget deficits over the next 10 years." By 2020, 90 cents of every dollar we collect will go to paying off the national debt. Not Who is to blame for this? Is it Boehner? Is it Obama? Was it the Tea Party? It is the person you see every time you look in the mirror. Since we were the folks who fell asleep at the switch shouldn't we be the people to fix it? If you truly want to see what happened to us take a look at the GEICO ad with the parents telling us that they have taught their 5 year old son to dunk a basketball because saving was hard. Says it all.

Chris Miller

5:39 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Wayne
There is more to the Army thing and I am not sure anymore what it is. Will have to do some research. I just wish we would stop our businesses from going to China and being forced to give up goodied to them on the stuff they build. I also would like to know what happened to all those Buddists nuns who contributed to Al Gore. What I really miss is the two parties supplying us with good and decent candidates at all levels.

Chris Miller

9:45 am on Monday, October 10, 2011

Nancy
Are you kidding me? Your news source is aljazeera and you believe that two very wealty men can give come up with enough money to save the world. And, of course, it is always the Tea Party's fault. You might want to check out what John Lewis went through this week end. Pay attention to the "useful idiots" in Atlanta.These folks are going to bring us the French Revolution. By the way you might want to check out the plan known as Agenda 21. It is going to be a big thing in our lives particularly if you are a business man or own a home.

Rosemary B

10:42 pm on Monday, October 10, 2011

The 1% are not just billionaires, like the occupyers think. "According to IRS tax data, anybody earning $380,354 or more qualifies for membership in the top 1 percent."

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

7:52 am on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

I am not in the 1%, but I am proud to be in the 53% who pay federal income tax! As opposed to the 47% who pay no federal income tax and many who get money back from the Federal Income Tax system.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:16 am on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Man, how I wished to be in this 1% club...Of course, it's my fault (according to Mr. Herman Cain) for being with the 99% collection of losers and should not go out there to occupy and expose the unfairness of how many of these 1 percenter got there...The system is rigged in their favor, and their defenders cry foul because now we are beginning to understand their modus operandi: engaging in risky speculation (with our money) and peddling worthless papers...Wake up, people...We are getting dragged down to the cleaners.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

1:53 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Wilfredo
You have been down throwing around generalities and accussations for days now. You have demeaned the Tea Party, the only people who are fighhting against what you dislike while you hang out with LEPOCO. Tell me, how is the system rigged. Take a look at Mr,Cain's Bio, Read about Justice Thomas who was reared by his grandfather. There are places in this world where you would have been arrested and locked up a long time ago for what you have said but you are lucky because you live in the United States of America. I have asked you to explain yourself and you do not do that but like the Protestors at Wall Street you have no problem spitting on this country. Did you see how these parrots treated John Lewis. I am not a big fan of Mr. Lewis because we disagree on political matters. But this was a man who was severly beaten as he marched for the civil rights of black men, women and children. Shame on the whole lot of the "useful idiots" in the parks

Terri Simpson

4:01 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Protesters 6 arrested they surged into the senate office. Great Job today showing everyone how Radical they are. I wonder how much it is costing the taxpayers for all the police??? It is so disgusting but I am happy that finally people are looking at this and the Democratic party and saying is this what the party stands for. So keep up the destruction because if we are lucky it will destruct the Democratic party just like in the 60's.

Nancy O'Keefe

6:08 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Dear Patch,
Might I suggest that, before anyone is permitted to post, our sentence construction and grammar be scrutinized so that readers can understand what we are trying to say.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:34 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

That would prevent some people who are not native to our country and people without the benefit of a fabulous education from participating in these discussions. Very discriminatory. Perhaps only 1% would be allowed a voice here!

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

1:59 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Mine was also a bit of humor.
1% allowed to post. 99% left out.
Maybe we need smiley faces to recognize humor ? :)

Terri Simpson

6:36 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

" liberty, once lost,is lost forever"

Terri Simpson

6:39 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

1.9 million in overtime to police NY "occupy wall street"

Nazaretti

7:33 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Wow, Terri, it seems like the demonstrators have really got under your skin!

Terri Simpson

9:43 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Nazaretti,
No actually I am thrilled with this it is a gift. I do like to set facts straight

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:26 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Aaaaargh!...I wanted to reply to Chris Miller's unending put down comment yesterday, but the Reply button is not there (Ms Rosemary B instructed me how to do it to no avail)...Anyway, here it is...Chris. much as I try to rebut your concerns, you appear to miss the gist of what I write...From here on, I am not even going to attempt to "explain" myself since you do not have the capacity to comprehend any of it...You just come on with your personal insults (liar, communist, illiterate)...You even called someone a sack of excrement...What was that all about?..I expect that kind of gutter language from a school drop out...Your labels of me were made without basis in fact: liar?-You admitted I told the truth...Communist?-I dabble in the market, communists are anti-capitalism, unless you did not know that...Illiterate?-You don't even know me...Apologies? Not in your upbringing...You wouldn't like it if I called you a creep, would you?..But I'm not going to do it because I am a decent person...So, rant away if you wish and make a fool of yourself.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:52 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Nancy, that is so funny! My husband and I say the same exact things. But we say them about the people on the Left! I guess we are not so different after all!

Comment_arrow

Wayne Schissler

10:12 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Nancy husband says,
"These people don't even know that they are voting against their own interest."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy, as a Tea Party member you can't imagine how many times I have heard this charge leveled at us. WE DO KNOW - because we don't believe it's government's job to hand out slices of some imaginary economic pie, we are the one's with our hand out in the "no thank you" position, not the gimme position. Do some of our members currently receive some sort of gov't benefit - of course. We play by the rules as we find them.

Here's an example. The new Healthcare regs forces insurance companies to cover my child on my policy until she's 26. I was prepared to help her buy her own but now I don't have to for another year. I realize that there must have been many thousands of insurance policies that could have been sold by PEOPLE WHO COULD HAVE AFFORDED IT but no, the government took care of that. I've encountered people who think that's wonderful. I think it's an abomination that this middle class welfare has literally bought peoples allegiance.

My philosophy: "Lord, please keep me from coveting my neighbors goods and I pray you prevent the government from stealing them for me."

Comment_arrow

Wayne Schissler

10:12 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

The fact that the Tea Party isn't there looking to be bought, doesn't have it's hand out - or as I often hear, "These people don't even know that they are voting against their own interest" - is what makes us dangerous in the politicians eyes. The "occupy" forces are just the opposite - their hands are out and they have scapegoats to blame all their troubles on. Their movement is no different than any other that has been whipped up by demagogues over the centuries.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

11:21 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Wilfredo
I have asked you numerous questions on this space. How is the system rigged? Why are you in favor of this disorganized movement, a movement that refused to allow John Lewis to speak. I have asked you what you have read and have seen not one title. Tell me the latest history book you have read. I'll even settle for a good Tom Clancy novel. You stated that there was no difference between a Democracy and a Representative Republic. If you do not know that you are truly lost. If you "dabble in the market" tell me why you are protesting and give me a stock or two that you own. I'll even take your word for it. If it makes you feel better call me a creep but let me note that I have been called worse then that by others. You should be intent on educating yourself and there is plenty of information out there. You might want to check out Michelle Bachman's statements from last evening's debate. They were on the issues discussed here.

Terri Simpson

9:39 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Nancy,
If what you said was truthful these protesters would embrace the Tea- party and they would not cause millions in damage and defecate on police cars and try to intimidate people in there private homes. The Tea-party is for Limited government fiscal responsibility no more bailouts bring back prosperity You state about civility well between Wilfredo and you it's been vicious but Obama and his administration rant about playing nice yet they are the most guilty and play dirty and lie for the power.
Occupy wall street is his base Obama is managing the decline of America. Obama is the king of community organizing it's not organic everyone knows it. I must say this is a gift because this surely will backfire and making Obama a one term president. Will you demand a shut down of speech again because you are not happy with others opinions? Will you keep on insulting people and blame them for the very thing you are doing? I would suggest you stop watching MSNBC and CNN and really do research on the Tea-Party and you will find maybe that's the group for you. I would more than gladly find a meeting for you to attend . I am sure you really want Limited government no more bailouts and hold people accountable. I have a tee shirt waiting for you Tea-Party Patroit

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

11:06 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Whoops!..I just saw my name on your post, Ms Simpson, accusing me of being vicious...At least not as VICIOUS as yours and many other posters here who have differing views...One particular person's blogs are laced with personal insults and name calling...If you want to debate, I welcome it, but no personal accusatory innuendos...Say whatever you want against other people's opinions within bounds...I can be vicious with policiesI disagree with...This is what I see in these posts...I think this is fair.

Terri Simpson

10:38 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Truth are lies and lies are Truth. It's so funny that the principals of the Tea- party are not embraced by Occupy Wall Street and the defenders of this group, they completely ignore the destruction and the millions of dollars the taxpayers will be on the hook for. It's very interesting to see how the conversation turns when the truth is exposed. It's my treat a very nice tee shirt showing how much you love this country or I could get a tee shirt made up saying "It's Bush's fault forever" and on the back " I hate capitalism" you know there are enough people down on wall street that would love this tee could make a small fortune.

Chris Miller

11:05 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Wayne Schissler
Let me add that this movement is just as dangerous today as it was under countless individuals who ended their movement with some kind of "ism" The problem with this group is that they refuse to recognize the role of every individual in this nation and that our real problems are in Washington DC. Yesterday Mr. Obama announced that not only is he breaking up his Jobs Bill into several pieces, he once against threatens to circumvent Congress by using an Executive Order(s). Why are we allowing that?

Rosemary B

8:20 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Dear Wilfredo, I have said this before, LIMITED GOVERNMENT is very different from NO GOVERNMENT. No sane person on the right wants to drown the government in a bathtub and make it disappear altogether! Some would like it to be limited by the authority given to it by the Constitution.

Here is an interesting column written by Senator Susan Collins from Maine about how Regulations are effecting small businesses in her state. These are the types of crazy things that need to be limited in order to create jobs

http://collins.senate.gov/public/continue.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.WeeklyColumn&ContentRecord_id=25593644-fe69-0878-1f86-80c45adcc09f&;

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

8:52 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Rosemary B...Unless you did not know, a certain Norquist Grover (I might have murdered his name) is his desire to "drown the government in a tub"), no regulations, no nothing...Is he insane then?..I still want my government to work for me and everyone...Another proverb Ms B is "When the cat is away, the mice will play"...I mentioned to Ms. Terri Simpson about the 2008 financial crisis debacle brought on by deregulations...Your party keeps gutting these regs (Dodd-Frank Act, EPA, others) and yet your party would get into women's uteri by controlling their rights...Less government indeed.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

10:34 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I, personally, am somewhere in the middle between the over regulated state that we are currently in and strict, limited by the constitution, government, but definitely more towards limited government. The financial crisis was also brought on by a regulation from Jimmy Carter's era, The Community Reinvestment Act. Regulations can bring on as much harm as good and the over regulation of our society is killing job growth and creation.

http://www.youtube.com/user/SensibleRegulations?blend=21&ob=5#p/u/4/X1K3ShBN338

This You Tube small business page has many videos on how all the regulations are hurting and, in some cases, threatening to put their small businesses out of business. You can also look at the column cited above in my original post for more examples of over regulation hurting business growth and, therefore, hurting our economy.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

8:33 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I am in the phone book...I do not have any ulterior motive to be incognito...You can come to my house and hurt me, but that does not solve anything...Don't waste your time calling either because I have a caller ID...I don't pick up on unfamiliar callers...so let's debate here in a civilized manner, no more sack of excrement expletives, shall we?

Chris Miller

9:50 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Wilfredo
You have shown your ignorance about our Founding an Founders. You think you will make points with us by proposing an "ism" form of government.. You support a group of ignorant protesters whose numbers don't come close to those who are in the Tea Party. . As to the form of government we desire, it is government with a small "d". The Founders looked upon the states/commonwealths as laboratories. They were to be free to try various things pertaining to various issues. The most successful would be adopted by the rest. Tom Corbett's decision to allow the counties to tax the gas companies in northern PA is a perfect example. Given that the work is being done there those counties need the money thus they should levy the tax. Non-drilling affected counties should not get any money from the state on this issue. Another example is illegal immigrants in that the states need to handle the issue because the Federal government is unable or uniwilling to do it. Last but not least we need to strip the Congress of its abuse of the commerce clause. In closing let me suggets that you get the Express-Times today Read George Will's editorial on Page A4. Pay particular attention to your president's involvement with the Solyndra matter. Can you say crook. You need an education when it comes to the history of this nation because standing by the plans of the Founders does make my Righteous. We were and are a nation founded on morals and religion. While you are at it check UN Agenda 21

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

11:55 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Mr. Chris Miller...You profess knowledge of current events, but as I see it, you are as clueless to the purposes of the Occupyers...You have your George Will and I have the Economy Nobel Price winner Paul Krugman (read his latest "Opus" Panic of the Plutocrats in the New York times on Oct. 10...That should educate you a little bit about how these multigazillioneers got so rich...Yeah, the rich and their defenders are getting agitated because their excessive ways are being exposed...If you think the numbers of anti Wall Street protesters are meager, the last time I heard was protesters are in Seoul, S. Korea, too, bringing attention to income inequality in their country due to uneven playing fields...I am sorry but I cannot cheer on the sidelines for the rich while the middle class and the poor are getting ripped off...Capitalism is good but not greed...We do not want capitalism (ism) going berserk, that's all.

Chris Miller

10:11 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Nancy
The limits of the government our defined in the Constitution and those powers are enumerated. Articles One, Two and Three are the basic outline. You will not find them in any paper from the Middle East. Don't worry about jobs because governments don't provide jobs they provide policies that supprot those who want to build companies and create jobs. I am perfectly ok with doing away with those cabinet positions like the EPA, Department of Education, Homeland Security,, Department of Energy and all those that came after the Washington Administration. These departments are filled with over paid administrators and help. Please feel free to tell me all the great things done by the Department of Energy or Education. As to drugs. not all of it comes across the border because we have lots of it made here and legally grown here. Heck we had a meth lab blow up in Nazareth right across the street from the police station. The borough has drug dealing going on in the alleys. A meth home burned in Bushkill Township. These are all things that could and should be handled at the local, county or state level. I would wager, given that we spend 13K on average to educate our children in public school that we could find some smart people to assist us at a much cheaper price. If the Feds do not want to take care of the illegals why would they want to contribute money to stop drugs or bad air and water.

Mary Anne Looby

12:07 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Gosh, sorry I've been so busy this week that I missed out on this long suffering debate! I don't have the time or the inclination to go back and read all the posts. One thing is patently clear, if you talk about money or politics everyone has an opinion! I do have to agree with MS O'Keefe, often times the grammar, word usuage and punctuation is so lacking that it is difficult to figure out what the poster is saying!

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

12:35 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Guilty as charged...Please bear with me...I am a LEGAL immigrant learning to write in English...I just wish gutter language is not part of the prose.

Comment_arrow

Nancy O'Keefe

12:38 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Somehow I don't think she meant you, Wilfredo!!

Salisbury Resident

12:24 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

The Tea Party is a middle-class movement of people who want limited government, less spending, less debt, low taxes, and the repeal of ObamaCare. Occupy Wall Street isn't a movement. It's a series of events populated by a weird cast of disaffected characters, ranging from anarchists and anti-Semites to socialists and LaRouchies. What they have in common is an amorphous anger aimed at banks, investors, rich people and bourgeois values.
The Tea Party reveres the Constitution and wants to change laws to restore the country to prosperity. Occupy Wall Street started by occupying a New York City park and then blocked the Brooklyn Bridge, sparking the arrest of hundreds.
The Tea Party files for permits for its rallies and picks up its trash afterwards. Occupy Wall Street tolerates protesters who defecate on police cars, allows the open sale of drugs at protests, and features women walking around rallies topless.
The Tea Party has settled down to democracy's patient, responsible work, either by exerting influence on the Republican Party nomination process or educating Americans on the issues in order to hold politicians in both parties to account.
By comparison, Occupy Wall Street seems alienated by the American political system. It has no concrete agenda and no plan to become a political institution. Yet it needs both things to have an impact on politics or policy. Without them, Americans will be interested in Occupy Wall Street's weird and off-putting side show for only so long

Comment_arrow

Salisbury Resident

12:25 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Taken directly from Foxnews.com, compliments of Karl Rove.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

12:32 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Salisbury Resident
Thank you for the above post. Factually, right on the money

Mary Anne Looby

12:47 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Wllfredo, I do not mean you and I congratulate you for taking the initiaitve that so many who are new to our shores do not. I wish you only the best in your life and learnings about the American way. Welcome to the USA!

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

1:10 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Whew!..THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU...GOD BLESS AMERICA!..I married a lovely white woman, too.

Chris Miller

12:54 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Wilfredoe
I have been keeping an eye on you pals. I have read their manifesto and it is the standard pap that comes from liberal youngsters as it did with the hippie generation. Thier ideas came from inducing drugs and alcohol--a problem then and now. If that is not the case maybe you can explain the defacating on the police car. As to your Paul Krugman, I will stay with the likes of Hyeck, Freidman, and Smith when it comes to the solid economists. In all reality, most folks look at the Nobel Prize as a joke. They gave it to the President and he had/has done nothing to deserve such an award. There is an old saying, be careful what you wish for, you just might get it. Have you ever spoken to someone who came to this country from places like Cuba, Hungary, Russia, Poland.I have. They came here because this nation gave them an opportunity to prosper and many that I knew did and do. They came here to be free something that we are less and less of in this nation. If a person is guitly of the crimes you tell us about without mentioning what they are, other then rich, that person will be fired and not only will but should stand trial. Read the Will article and tell me who should go to jail after all they did to bilk our government of $500+ million dollars. You want income equality. Are you really serious about that? Can you name one place in the world where that has succeeded? Check it out and let me know.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

1:41 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Oh, my...Who would you rather have?..A Nobel Prize winner Obama or George W. Bush who had a demoralizing Iraqi shoe thrown at him...How embarrassing was that?!..Obama was surprised with it too and proceeded to donate the award money to charity...(I should get a Nobel here too for being civil)...The economists you mentioned can't hold a candle to Krugman...On the crooks in Wall Street, I sincerely hope that someone has the guts to start the investigation and send these bad guys to jail...Convict beyond reasonable doubt is a favorite legal phrase...On income inequality, just look around Wall Street...Such disparity in wealth...Bottom line: Jobs...Reducing unemployment would greatly help the country succeed through revenues from taxes...Ooops bad word...But seriously, without revenues, the U.S. will continue to spiral into the abyss...The salaries won't "equal" those corporate earnings, but that is not the point...The gap should not be as wide as we see nowadays, but at least food will be on the table, bills will be paid, if there's anymore left, invest in the market and be part of sensible capitalism.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

3:06 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I lost all respect for the Nobel Prize the year that they awarded it to Al Gore over the lady who risked her life to save Jewish babies and children in Nazi Germany. And awarding it to Obama for nothing also did not help that organizations credibility.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

1:02 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Government is the problem, not the solution (by guess who)...He did not say big government...Sounds like no government to me...Here's another doozy: Let us tax the rich for their fair share ((from the same guy)...So what's the problem?..It's not like we want all of their money to support the Occupyers and the nasty hate-filled liberals...If we taxed the filthy rich 75%, they still have money left to buy an island, mansions, hire people...A little bit of sharing should not hurt that much...Why would Warren Buffett be in lower tax bracket than me?..So unfair!

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

3:57 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Wilfredo
Your comment on Buffet shows all of us that you do not really understand what is going on. Buffet pays two taxes. He pays a hefty tax on his wages that he puts into things that will earn him money they he pay a tax on his capital gains at a lower rate. He was being stupid when he made that comment. You should have thought that some thing like that could not be true.

Comment_arrow

Bob Zahm

9:49 pm on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

It's not sharing when someone (the gov't) threatens to throw you in jail and steal (ur confiscate) your property if you do not pay taxes. Sharing is when someone voluntarily gives away what they have to others. If Mr. Buffet feels so strongly that he is undertaxed, have him give away his fortune to the gov't NOW instead of working most of if through the Gates Foundation.

An interested bystander

3:04 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Nobel Prize Winner Obama.... Wilfredo, even Obama admitted it was completely undeserved. Since the award he's been a bigger war monger than Bush was (by liberal definition).

Chris Miller

3:37 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Rosemary
I honestly forgot that Al Gore had gotten the Nobel. Wasn't it for making clouds or something?

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

3:49 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Obama did not ask for this award...It was given to him instead of bungling Bush...Obama inherited a mess of Iraq and Afghanistan and he is trying to end it in the best possible way and he is the war monger...McCain and other Republican war mongers want to bomb places some more to show the world who is boss...Give me a brake.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

4:08 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Well what did you expect? You might want to see how many president's get the Nobel Peace Prize. Yep your president inherited those two wars. He promised to get the troops out but they are still there. Then he started a war with Libya and keep in mind that there are troops on the ground. There are probably troops in Pakistan, Yemen and possibly Iran. Plus we have troops all over the world. You might want to ask why do we do that.?

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

6:57 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

Erratum: brake should read break...Sorry.

Chris Miller

3:53 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Wilfredo
So you are a legal immigrant from Mexico. Congratulations. Now all you need to do is go to history class. Of course my question is if you are all over the "isms" how did you ever acquire enough history to take and past the test? Just asking. As to your so called economist, he could not hold a candle to Adam Smith, Frederick Hayek, and Milton Freidman.Heck, he couldn't hold a candle to my economics professor, Dr. Yung, at Moravian College. I'll even toss in Samuelson as a better economist. Even better, Ronald Reagan was a better economist or Paul Volker and Alan Greenspan were better. My wife is a better economist then Krugman. I was not a big fan of George Bush but look what you guys tossed us, Gore or Kerry. Again, tell me what do you mean by income inequality. That smells like you are a bit envious of people who are rich. If you want that I'll wager you can find it in your home country. So why did you come here so that you could stick you finger in the eye of hard working Americans. Exactly what do you do for a living or are you living off of me and mind? You like to spit on this nation and the hard working people and then spout platitudes. Let's say we take 75% from those filthy rich people to pay our huge debt. How much exactly would we get from them? In fact why not take all of their money how much would we get to pay the debt and your salary? I have asked you numerous questions and you have been unable to answer any of them

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

4:14 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Mr. Miller...Your questions are so irrelrvant in this discussion about Wall Street Occupyers, therefore, I am not glorifying them with answers...Your wife is a better economist than Krugman...Now I heard it all...These are your opinions...Bask in them if they make you feel more superior in this discussions...They don't mean anything to me.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

3:59 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Even the Nobel Prize is now being demonized because some awards were given to Democrats...Wasn't Milton Friedman, a Republican, also given an award on Economics?..Please, enough politics already...We should be glad these awards were given to Americans...This is what we are proud AMERICANS...I am hoping a genius Republican would get one soon, too...I would be rooting for the person instead of belittling him/her...Unreal!

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

4:29 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

The Nobel Prize is being laughed at not demonized. If you knew the history of the prize and of Alfred Nobel you would understand. As to a Republican winner, well we got ours with Milton Freidman. I want you to understand that my issue with Krugman is his progressive/liberal idealogy and idealogy that has failed around the world. It inspired entltlement and mediocrity. Tell me why did you come to America? Was it the fact that we are becoming and entitlement nation? Gee we might end up looking like England or France. Meanwhile Russia has lowered its corporate tax I believe to somewhere like 10-13 percent.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

11:24 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I am not upset because the Nobel prize went to Democrats! I am upset it went to people unworthy of it! Jimmy Carter won it in 2002 partially because of his involvement with Habitat for Humanity and his efforts, though sometimes misguided, towards peace. I have no problem with him winning this award. Gore won it over a woman who risked her life for years to save Jewish babies and children from the Nazis! I feel her contribution totally trumps his. He flies around in his private jet and lives in a large house and tells everyone else how our energy usage is causing Global warming and invests in things that benefit from his promotion of Global Warming! Compared to her sacrifices I must say "Big Whoop!" to Gore. And Obama has a law degree, was a Community Organizer, then a Senator, then President. And he is the most ill prepared president we have ever had. If that is all you have to do to win the Nobel Peace Prize then every one of our Presidents should have won one.

Chris Miller

4:03 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Nancy
First off when I got up this morning the First Amendment was still in place. How dare you make such a comment. I will stand against anyone who would walk all over the Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence. We are in trying times and while I will vehemently disagree with someone I will let them speak. Shame on you but this is exactly what will happen if we don't get back to what this nation is all about. I am sure Nancy that you could find a Nation that would allow you to stop freedom of speech if they even have it.

Comment_arrow

Salisbury Resident

4:15 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Chris' tone is not hateful. I don't see anything in there that is mean, or threatening or even close to a similar word. Yes it is challenging, and when the demokratz are challenged, the response is always similar... "blame (whoever you want)" and "you're mean." Bottom line, Chris is correct in many many ways. As I watch, I am proudly drinking my tea, not kool-aid.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

4:18 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Mr. Miller...Didn't you, at one time, try to censor me here, ordering me to stay out of Patch?

Chris Miller

4:12 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

You tell me to shut up but I am the hateful one. Are you married to Wilfredo:) There a happy face. So one is to come here and just go blahh, blah, blahh, blah, and blah all day long. Amazing.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

6:56 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

You blog in tandem with Rosemary B but I don't insult her by associating her with you...Amazing!

Terri Simpson

4:17 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

The constitution is a document that does not exist in the Liberal mind.
Shutting down speech is nothing new for a liberal,Socialist or communist.
Hatred,class warfare,lies, propaganda, violence,entitlement blaming others for there pathetic lives is the mantra they spew. I think some real nice Real Estate can be purchased in N Korea.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

4:31 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Salisbury Resident...Mr. Miller called me a liar, a communist, illiterate without basis...No apologies, of course...He called someone a sack of excrement...If that's not hateful, I don't know what you consider pleasant.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

4:47 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

You have yet to supply me with evidence that I am wrong and that does not include the one year old story I read.

Chris Miller

4:33 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Wilfredo
For all you know my wife has a PhD in economics. In days gone by a husband would have demanded satisfaction. But she's not. You might really want to concentrate on your history instead of almost insulting my wife. By the way, she does take care ot the books. I may have told you to go study history and then come back. If I did, my humblest of apologies.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

5:01 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

WOW!..Humblest apologies...Did I read that right?..I did not know you have the capacity to do that...And I gladly accept...Although it wasn't about history lessons...It's about my alleged lie that you wanted me to rectify (It wasn't a lie and you know it) and banish me from the Patch...I do not insult people as you do, and I never will insult your wife...I am a sucker for intelligence and I hope she gets the chance to do some econometrics on our country's ongoing difficulties.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:20 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

You ask for evidence on your mistakes?...You are wrong in calling me a communist...I dabble in the market so that is not a behavior of a communist...i like capitalism as much as the next person, but within reason...No capitalism out of control...You labeled me illiterate... How else can I know how to write in the Patch if I am indeed illiterate...You know not what you say, sir.

Terri Simpson

4:34 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Nancy,
Thank You, it's not too often I come across a brilliant mind like yours.I am flattered to know that someone like you could even respond to any of my post.I just wanted to invite you to the big bash I will be having ONE TERM OBAMA party when we will be rid of the worst president in history. Don't worry Nancy I will have plenty of tissues for you. Thanks again for being so nice and polite you know how some can be.. very rude and nasty must have horrible lives.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

4:45 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Terri
With tongue in cheek. You go girl!!!!!!

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

4:39 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Chris Miller...On the Buffett issue, don't take it from me...He said it himself that his tax rate is lower than his minions...And mine...I can't argue with that.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

4:45 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

What is you news source, the river of Styxx or Dants's Inferno. News does continue from one day to the next. What Buffet said was countered by some one else. Supposedly Buffet is not thrilled with being tied to a Tax that now has is name. Read all the news.I wouldn't think of taking anything from you WIlfredo.

Chris Miller

5:18 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Gee Wilfredo I give you a sincere apology and I noted my error on the MoveOn.org lady where a Ron Paul supporte stepped on her head though she was well enough to be in a video with no discernable marks. You also, as noted had failed that this incident had happened back in 2010. Now I get a back handed compliment and you continue to not answer a single question I have asked. Shame you are so lacking in manners and impolite to boot.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

6:58 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

You apologized on some statement you said, and for what it's worth I accepted because I sense that you don't have the capacity to do so...This stomping incident that happened some time ago was what i was refer.ring to when you called me a liar...It was the truth and you know it, but you never apologized about it...You called me illiterate and a communist without bases but you never acknowledged your arrogant mistake...How can we debate in peace when you continue to behave like a neanderthal...I lack manners?..You should look yourself in the mirror...Your previous bigoted rants about my national origin, that I was sucking up your resources (I bet I have more than you do) was uncalled for...What has that got to do with the Wall Street protesters?..Stay on the issue and quit the inane diatribe.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

12:06 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

Wilfredo, perhaps it is the language barrier, but the way I read your very first post about this incident seemed to infer that you were physically there and actually witnessed such behavior at a Tea Party rally. Not that you happened to see this incident on TV.Perhaps it was that same misunderstanding that led Mr. Miller to call you a liar?
We have all come out against this incident and condemned it specifically. But when you have been presented with TONS of evidence of violence against the Tea Party, your reaction against it has been lukewarm, at best. Simply saying something like both sides have done bad things. I find that to be hypocritical, at best. Don't mean to pile on you, but that has really been bothering me.

Nazaretti

5:28 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

On the Warren Buffett tax issue - Why does our tax code penalize work by taxing salary & wages at a higher rate than investment income? Don't we want to encourage work?

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

12:08 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

I think they lowered the Capital Gains tax to encourage investment and to help retired people, like my 88 yr old mother, who gets a decent portion of her income from her stock dividends.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

12:20 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

And I think that investment income was also taxed once already at the corporate rate as profit, but I could be wrong about that.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:09 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

Very good question. You might want to take it before your Congressman.

Mary Anne Looby

7:14 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

I wouldn't worry about the Warren Buffett's of the world. The ones we should worry about are the "hollywoods, sports super stars and any of the others who are laughing all the way to their foreign bank accounts with the money YOU spend to put them where they are. Buffett, Gates, and a few others like them are putting their money where their mouths are, they are working to make this country a better place. What has Brangelina done for you lately????

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:46 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

Mary Anne
Not worry about Buffet and his friends. Buffet owes a small fortune in back taxes can you and I do that. He either deliberately lied or misled the nation with his comment about hs secretary being in a higer tax bracket. Given the TOTAL NATIONAL DEBT, see the national debt clock, Gates, Buffet's and any others would be a drop of assistannce in the oceans

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:29 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Touche'!..No I am not concerned one bit about these philanthropists...I am just happy they are helping the universe...The other characters you mentioned, however, may not even realize that their wealth is being taxed higher than you and me...Brangelina have some charitable projects, too..Brad Pitt is working on setting up houses in New Orleans, and wifey pooh appears to be doing some International charity (not sure what).

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:45 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

Rosemary B...Re: Language barrier/thuggish behaviors...I don't know how else to say it but I thought I said I saw the incident on TV...And for thuggish behavior, my goodness Ms B, how else do you want me to tell you that I or any decent individual do not condone such criminal behaviors...You tell me.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

3:18 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Actually, Wilfredo, that finally was a strong condemnation of what the Labor Unions have done to the Tea Party. Thank you for that. Definitely stronger then the "NEITHER SIDE HAS THE MONOPOLY OF RIGHTEOUSNESS...Each one is guilty of misbehavior"
I am just so sick and tired of the democrats making a big deal over every little thing Republicans do and then they turn around and do the same and worse and it gets no coverage or condemnation at all. The double standard is nauseating! Solyndra is a perfect example of that as are the problems Eric Holder is having.

Chris Miller

10:21 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

Wilfredo
Tell you what I will do. Since you are incapable of accepting an apology I will retract it. You are still flirting with one of the "isms" and while you are tossing out your various leftist beliefs you continue to refuse to answer any of my requests. You believe in the continuation of the entitlement state where you look for a handout and not a job. You want us to believe that you are here legally from some place, you never said from whence you came.and you want us to believe you aren't a communist because you supposedly have money in the stock market. That is really hilarious. Its almost like the occupiers who hate corporations yet they carry iPhones and various products produced by corporations..

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

11:50 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

Chris...I enumerated 3 put down items that you have not apologized for: communist, liar, illiterate...You labelled me these libelous descriptions without bases. Obviously, you refuse to acknowledge them because they make you feel more superior than I...If you take off your blinders, the Occupyers are not anti-capitalist/corporation...They just want a fair shake from Wall Street...No hand outs, just level playing field...This again you refuse to understand and keep ranting about how superior you are...Pathetic.

Chris Miller

12:08 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Wilfredo
You are an adherent to one of the "isms" examples are communism, progressivism, socialism, facism, etc. If you are on the left/liberal side of the political spectrum you fall into one of those spots. I don't believe you are a "Classical Liberaal" like our Founders and Framers nor or you a Conservative. So what is your ideology? Are you one of the Great Modeates that Rush is waiting for? You are illiterate because you have yet to cite anything you have read--I prefer something from our Founders or tell me you read the Constitution or Declaration of Independence. You can be illiterate when it comes to a subject area--but then you did not know that. Exactly what is a "fair shake" according to you. What exactly is a "level playing field" in your very humble opinion? Hate to tell you this and I know you will be surprised but there are a lot of people smarter then me. The difference between you and me is that I know that and you don't. When I don't know I look for the answer, ask my wife or call a friend in the field. I also ask questions. You prefer to speak in tongues.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

2:28 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Sir...I am proud to say that I subscribe to the Liberal ideology...None of your definition of communist even comes close to my liberal way of thinking...Your take on this group is such a broad stroke that you omitted altogether what are not part of their ideology...We are not subversive, we are not anti-capitalist, etc...You go the dictionary and see for yourself...Illiterate?..Again I implore you to educate yourself on what this means through the dictionary...If you don't understand the Theory of Relativity, that does not make you an illiterate...Finally, you have not redeemed yourself on this untruthful, malicious accusation of me as a liar...As for the poor souls who are trying so hard to be noticed in Wall Street and everywhere else, it is so typical of your party to demonize/belittle them...If, at this time, you don't know their plight, I regret I cannot offer you anymore explanation because you just refuse to take your time to understand...Like I said BLINDERS ON...Why bother with these "drug-induced losers"...Lastly, I don't really care about your IQ level...Keep posting on here and expose your ignorance some more.

Terri Simpson

1:23 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Someone is in need for a double dose of Valium today. I think the pressure of the truth is making someone crazy. I have that tissue box ready for you. I know that kool-aid you have been hitting kind of hard lately. I have the cure some nice soothing tea or Rush Limbaugh makes a great one if you want it cold. I will even throw in a good read for you Mark Levin's- Liberty & Tyranny. Nancy have a wonderful weekend thank you again for those insanely brilliant messages.

Comment_arrow

Nancy O'Keefe

1:32 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Thank you again, Terri, for your usual enlightenment! I guess I didn't really expect more than this from you. :)

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

9:54 am on Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Nancy.. Pay no heed to Terri. He seems to portray himself as a wit. And Nancy, I am sure in the interest of fairness and compromise, you will agree that he is half right.

Chris Miller

1:35 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Nancy
The first thing we need to do is cut spending and you do that by eliminating a pile of governmental departments like Education, Energy and EPA. Then you cut taxes and begin to back off programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. On top of that we need serious tort reforms and the discontinunce of nose bleeding legal cases. Those in the corporate world are not hiring because they are not completely sure of what is going to be the financial outcome of Obama care as well as Bush's drug plan. There is also the fact that we are now getiing individuals who are recognizing how Congress and both parties have abused the Commerce Clause. Top this off with things like getting rid of Public Unions. something FDR and George Meaney did not like, and we are on a way to the better life. If you do not believe we need to do anything at all allow me to suggest you go to the National Debt Clock and tell me all is okay. My French is a bit rusty so I prefer English, German or Pennsylvania Dutch.While you are at it check the Constitution Articles 1, 2, and 3. Real Enlightment there on governmental power

Chris Miller

1:57 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Nancy
Allow me to add a few words. First and foremost governments do not create jobs that is left up to those who run the businesses You might recall that Obama has said this on several occassions. Government can make policy to encourage business to create jobs with tax cuts one of them being the capital gains tax. Lower the rate and you will see investors doing more buying and selling of stocks. Raise the rate and the previoulsy mentioned will not occur. Lower the taxes and people will spend more on goods and services. We will begin to see that because prices on gas has declined but don't expect that to last. The Tea Party would supprt all of this. We are not going to get rid of government we want it smaller and more personal reaponsibility. Tea Party will also supprt that.

Chris Miller

4:30 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Wilfredo
The first president who worked to instill liberalism in this nation was Wilson. He was a Progressive who supported abotrion and eugenics. He supported the passage of laws that allow people to be sterilized because they werer "feeble minded". These laws existed into 1965. People were taken out of their homes and sterilized. Great book called War on the Weak. He told the nation he would keep us out of World War I.After the election we went into World War I under Woodrow Wilson. He supported the League of Nations and it failed. Did I mention he supported abortion. You will find these beliefs in all of the "isms" Remembeer the Jewish people and Hitler. Hitler was a liberal. Was there capitalism in Germany, the USSR, Cuba, China, Venezuela today. Listen to your pals the occupiers. They are all "ists" supproting an "ism" of one kind or another. You do not read history. I sincerely doubt that you are a citizen. And the major point is that you do not know who you are or what you stand for. You have no firm foundation because liberals fail to educate themselves. Instead they want to steal from me, complain about their jobs if they have one, and deficate on cars they do not own. Let me also call your attention to the fact that these heros in Boston spit on a female Coast Guard person and harassed her. Nice friends you have there. In NY a woman who owns a small restaurant has tried to keep the Occupiers out but can't and her business is down 40%. More nice pals you have.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:25 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

All this long winded rant from you and not a hint of acknowledgement of the epithets that you threw in my direction...Did you libel me or not?

Mary Anne Looby

4:46 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Wow! You guys really got carried away with this one! I sure hope you can all simmer down and have a nice week-end.

Mary Anne Looby

8:06 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Enough already! Go to bed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chris Miller

9:58 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Wilfredo
You are true sad sack aren't you, You can't answer questions. You just love it in that pity pit don't you. Maybe you should join the Young Republicans or bettet yet the Tea Party. You might start to feel better.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:45 am on Saturday, October 15, 2011

You are such a sorry example of a human being who cannot be happy until you insult someone...No, I refuse to belong to your club which is so bigoted and pro-rich...Damn the gays, protect the "Madoff" corporates of Wall Street.

Jason George

12:37 am on Saturday, October 15, 2011

There are over 350 comments on this story, from a lot of different people, with different ideas. Maybe that should tell the naysayers against Occupy why there are so many people out there protesting.

Comment_arrow

Mary Anne Looby

8:22 am on Saturday, October 15, 2011

Jason if only that were true. What we have here,IN MY OPINION, are aprox 5 people who have gotten together to gain their 15 minutes of fame by running the longest blog or some such thing. The jokes on us, who actually thought their might be something worth reading.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

8:39 am on Saturday, October 15, 2011

This is a debate going on across the nation. I would venture a lot of folks are opposed to the Occupiers particular a lady from the US Coast Gaurd who was spat upon last evening and harassed in Boston. Mark my words that those out there calling for a Revolution because their professors told them to do it are not being welcomed by the majority and in the long run, coming soon, they will return to the warmth of home or college.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

9:03 am on Saturday, October 15, 2011

People need to seriously look at the tax money being wasted on the police presence at these things. Millions of dollars in NYC and Boston alone. A scenario being played out across the nation and the world. These same people "protesting" will be the same people complaining when their services are cut because of the budget gaps that they themselves are causing! These people don't even know that they are protesting against their own interest.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

8:33 am on Saturday, October 15, 2011

At this writing, the Occupy Wall Street protest has gotten global, with some pundit naming it Global Spring...There must really be amiss in the global financial system that every conceivable disenfranchised person has awaken from deep sleep of apathy and let frustrations prevail...A national giant once said "There are no tyrants where there are no slaves."..Point well taken.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:38 am on Saturday, October 15, 2011

Unfortunately, this world is filled with easily manipulated useful idiots. They better be careful what they wish for, they just might get it.

Chris Miller

8:35 am on Saturday, October 15, 2011

Wilfredo
You really owe Terri an apology. Now. You set yourself up for all sorts of things. It could have been an informative discussion but you did not want to discuss. When you find yourself in a situation like this again you might want to find out both sides of the issue prior to the debate. That is how good debators win points and arguments. You also might want to listen and read. People who participated in this debate cited sources and I congratulate them for doing that. I may not agree with what they say or cite but i will stick by their side to say it. When someone begins to talk who is an obvious intelligent person, I have found that it is a good to to be quiet and listen. You seem more intend on getting your feelings hurt. and being a victim

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

8:50 am on Saturday, October 15, 2011

Apologize, Chris?..I thought that term is foreign to you...I can understand you defense for Terri (pea in a pod) but she was the one who started piling on me, with characterizations I don't deserve...She should be the one who must apologize, but what's the use...I did not see any issue on her tirade she wanted to discuss...You guys pick on me as a target, now you are ordering me to apologize!..Till hell freezes over...I have nothing to apologize for, but you do...I haven't castigated anyone, you did...That sack of excrement on someone was a winner...Oh, my!

Rosemary B

9:48 am on Saturday, October 15, 2011

Check out Lisa Fithian, one of the organizers of Occupy Wall St.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

5:58 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

I did. What a gal. I know I would want to bring her home to mom.

Chris Miller

6:42 pm on Saturday, October 15, 2011

Rosemary
You are correct on 999. The current mess we have, thank you Woodrow Wilson, is consistently used by those we elect to give them contracts. And you thought the tax bill was all about taxes. Far from it.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:22 am on Sunday, October 16, 2011

I will not glorify anymore of these insult-laden posts above...Obviously, civility is beyond their accepted vocabulariies.

It is so refreshing to witness the international reaction to global economic inequality where the rich get richer and the rest gets poorer...There is still hope for our government to respond to this phenomenon as the movement suggests...One way is to spend on infrastructure, education, others...This is going to be financed through taxing the rich (who are totally missing in this regard) to do their fair share...A little bit of increase on their income should not hurt them much.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:58 am on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Hate to tell you this Wilfredo but the richh are already on thier way out the door

Patch_comments_icon

Susan Koomar

8:02 am on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Thanks to everyone who is participating in this robust debate. Posts that include name calling will be deleted. The comments section on Patch is available for an exchange of ideas, not insults.

Chris Miller

10:01 am on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Rosemary B
You did a great job of explaing you position and the position of many. i commend you for the cites you dug out and gave us for our own education. This is not going to be easy and and Glenn notes be prepared.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

2:50 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Thank you, Chris. The amazing thing is that Glen predicted this happening 2 yrs ago! It is a shame more people are not listening and are not waking up. It will be too late by the time the useful idiots find that there are men behind the curtain just manipulating them.

Mark Jamison

10:56 am on Sunday, October 16, 2011

"This entire occupy Wall Street is plot to destroy America." Terri Simpson…….Really Terri ? Do you acyually believe that. Is there something in the movement's message of having had enough of corporate greed and and governmental acquiescence to their related crimes that makes you truly believe that this is a "plot to destroy America"? You have been barking like junk yard dog for two weeks on this train wreck of a conversation and you've done nothing but spew hatred and contempt.
You have put every American that is not a card carrying member of the Tea Party in a giant boat and advocated that it be set afire and subsequently sunk. And even worse you have taken another immigrant to this country who started out in this "conversation" in a very gentle and well spoken manner and you and your friend have backed him into a corner and made him defend himself for every word while you make insane comments like "I have found out all Liberals are rabid dogs when they are faced with the truth" Seriously…what does that even mean? You of all people (and I am making the assumption due to your grammar that English is a second language for you) should have some compassion for someone like Wilfredo.
Instead you and yours have worked overtime to alienate anyone that doesn't agree with you, trying so very hard to pit American against American. Sad. So please…stop trying to shout down anyone that doesn't agree with you and Chris…in other words …"Don't tread on me"…Peace.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

2:43 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

It is a shame that the note from Susan Koomar has already gone by the wayside!

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

5:09 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Mark
You have absolutely not idea about what is going on at this time in your nation. The people you are supporting known as Occupiers are those that Lenin referred to as 'Useful Idiots". Have you seen these people as they sit in our public parks repeating after their leader and waving their fingers. Did you see their treatment of John Lewis? Did you see the news stories out there prior to the occupiers occupying a plagrace. ce. They were treated and triained as though they were uneducable idiots. What a disgrace. You might want to keep in mind Mark that you are really looking at an enigma being constructed by revolutionaly reactionaries who are doing one thing with the left hand while the right hand is engaged in more onerous activity. Keep walking around in that dark room you inhabit or get out into the light and see what is occuring.before it is to late. As to the Tea Party, as I have told others you do not know these people and the effort they have put forth to restore America. You have never been to a Tea Party nor do you have the courage to do so.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

3:25 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

This movement was spontaneous without any help from any wealthy group...That Soros suggestion is all hot air...We are all in this together...This should not be politicized at all...Besides, we have the right to protest under the Constitution. and no one should tell us to go home.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

5:43 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Not is was not spontaneous. The fact that these people respond in kind like mind num robots repeating things as a group and waving their hands and fingers in unison points out that they were coached. The news stations reported in the first week that donated food was coming into the park in NYC.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

6:46 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

This article begs to differ with your point of view. Soros may not have gone down there and handed anyone a check personally but a lot of the organizations he supports sure have!

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/9269-big-soros-money-linked-to-occupy-wall-street

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

6:49 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

"While the occupation movement purports to be “leaderless,” in reality, critics say its leaders and financiers are barely concealed. According to analysts, the protests — which are quickly spreading to cities across the United States, Canada, and Europe — actually represent a well-orchestrated operation being used by the very same elite “one percent” supposedly being protested against.

The “official” goals remain murky so far, almost certainly not by chance. But it is becoming increasingly apparent that liberty and honest money are not among the demands. Rather, bigger government, higher taxes, and an end to what remains of the free market system seem to be at the top of the list."

Quoted from above article.

Rosemary B

4:13 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

"It's easy to be an activist, it's not so easy to be an effectivist. You need well-researched and articulated demands that cannot be dismissed as being ridiculous."
Duff Connacher, founder of Democracy Watch,

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

5:31 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Just came across this article in the Washington Post this AM stating that the Tea Party also started as a protest against the elites in Washington AND WALL STREET...These elites are stuffing themseves with goodies at our expense...I don't see why the naysayers are all upset about the OCCUPYERS when the two movements have much in common...Misinformation once again, I suppose from, guess where, FAUX FOX NEWS, Glenn Beck (they're gonna getcha) or drugster Rush Limbaugh.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

6:58 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

If I remember correctly that is because the Tea Party was against the BAILOUTS. I am reasonably sure this has been stated already. By me. We all agree things have got to change. But not by wasting millions and millions of taxpayer dollars on these protests and crippling these cities and! You need to do what the Tea Party has done and take your protest to the voting booth and elect new people who believe what you believe. And let the voters decide what way they want to go and what solutions they want.

Chris Miller

5:41 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Wilfredo
Two quick questions for you. What was the month, day, year and issue of the Washington Post? Have you ever sat down with a member of the Tea Party or the Occupiers? I am wagering you have not.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

5:53 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Aljazeeraf as a source--I am yet again impressed. I wouldn't listend to a middle east news paper You pretty much are indicting for those of us who are not on your side. How open minded you Progressives are. And again tell me the deregulation that happened and who did the deregulating . If it is as you state then you are correct Why Isn't Anyone In Jail? I am waiting for your response or will you be the next Wilfredo.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:13 am on Monday, October 17, 2011

Washington Post, October 16, 2011...I was with the Occupy Easton protesters, too...I stay away from the other group as much as I can...I read/hear about them and I believe I can never be one of them from what I learn from all types of liberal and conservative (Fox News) media sources: Print, TV, Radio...I told you earlier that I don't like their ideology...End of discussion.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

8:30 am on Monday, October 17, 2011

Additional info on your query about the WashPost article: Author of Opinion is David Ignatius...It's on today's (10/17) Internet issue again.

Chris Miller

6:15 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

Nancy
Know I am afaid I am unfamiliar with the process or rhetoric the President Obama MUST FOLLOW. What I do remember is his cmment about it being "Just Words" as though they mean nothing at all and that is exactly how he sees them. I am not bestowing upon you the words of FNC. I am basing my comments on my 32 years as a history teacher, my 66 years of life and my constant reading that I so every day; I will not as note pay no attention to aljazeera as a source. As to the greed and corruption, I never said that I didn't find greed and corruption there. But Wall Street and the Banks are not the major problem and that, as I told you earlier, was the reason you include politics and politicians in the issue.

Wayne Schissler

6:17 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

"Have you ever sat down with a member of the Tea Party or the Occupiers?"

I am a Tea Party member who has visited (those are pictures I took at the top of this page) and talked to the local Occupy Allentown group on the first day of their protest. I would say that their main problem, besides the kooks that are attracted to the movement, is a myopia on their view of what is the main problem.

They are fixated on the undue influence that the wealthy and corporations have on the federal government. Paradoxically the Tea Party shares some of that concern in that favored businesses and industries receive bailouts, subsidies, and special treatment. But the problem goes way beyond that in the average Tea Party member's view. Attacking just one aspect of government favoritism is only leaving the door open wider to all the other special interests out there.

For an illustration contrasting the OWS viewpoint with a less myopic one see:
http://lvtp912.blogspot.com/2011/10/variation-on-popular-venn-diagram-going.html

Comment_arrow

Mark Jamison

9:53 am on Monday, October 17, 2011

Come on Rosemary. You are smarter than this. Chris is too far gone but you MUST recognize that if all you read is right wing propaganda than you're going to see it that way and vice versa. We need an unbiased news sorce that focuses on the facts and not one that focuses on the lunatic fringeof EITHER side. Don't fall into the ratings trap and become a "my way is the only way" zombie. The truth is ALWAYS somewhere in the middle. A great disussion would be one that looks at the stricking number of beliefs that the Tea Party and OWS have in common. We're all in this together. Peace

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

11:28 am on Monday, October 17, 2011

Just putting it out there. Only the future will tell us who was right and who was wrong. It is interesting to note that 2 years ago Glen Beck did predict that this would happen (among other things that he was right about) and he does study history. I remember my history teacher telling us those who forget or ignore their history are doomed to repeat it. Just trying to warn that there is a possibility that all these demonstrations are not as innocent and unconnected as they appear. And I do read and listen to all sides. I am actually a bit of a news junkie and had wanted to be a journalist myself at one time. I find it interesting to see how the different news outlets cover things.

Limeport Resident

11:06 am on Monday, October 17, 2011

Mark is right but I do not share the belief that the truth is somewhere in the middle. However, extreme positions being almost always wrong is a notion I do accept. Interestingly, the right wing blasts the OWS movement as having terrible left wing views when in fact they have not taken a stand on any policy except that our system has become one that doesn't serve " the people of we are the people". This speaks to the fact that they cannot defend their radical views without making up false ones to attack. They are wrong that OWS is leftist. Tea Partiers have attended and are part of the OWS movement. You don't have to be leftist to support fellow Americans who don't have jobs. Cut taxes has been proven to be ineffective. Almost the same amount as the Bush tax cuts have been invested overseas, resulting in no effect in the USA except to those who benefited from the tax cuts. I agree with Mark that the Tea Party has values that coincide with OWS. Chris is too far gone; when one preens by listing his degrees at colleges but has no list of peer reviewed articles attached to make his point and states with certainty half truths, the dialog is not very meaningful. OWS is starting a movement that can result in having a strong middle class again. I hope we all get involved in taking back America! (something that is a Tea Party value also)

Chris Miller

9:22 pm on Monday, October 17, 2011

Limeport Resident
You old smoothie trying to win over the ladies. So I am to far gone. Your group has now been supported buy the Soviet Communists and the American Nazi Party. China is supporting you as are the Union thugs, the president of Iran and George Soros. Who will show up next. Don't know what you might be huffin and puffin but while some from the Tea Party might have been there to try to reason with you I sincerely doubt that any became your new found friends. You are out to destroy this nation. Were that not the case you and your group would denounce the supporters I have mentioned.

Chris Miller

9:30 pm on Monday, October 17, 2011

Mark
My so calles right wing propaganda happens to be history or historical books. Of course I know that you are avoiding the works of Bill Ayers and those supposedly written by our current man in the White House. You would never be caught reading the likes of Paul Krugman of the NY Times or Dana Milbank of the Washington Post with a little hint of Leonard Pitts from the MIami Herald. Now why don't you tell me about those things shared by you and the Tea Party. You can get Limeport Resident to assist since he is of the same mind. I also suspect we would never see you at MSNBC or some place of that nature. I would remind you that Rosemary B's resolve is akin to mine

Comment_arrow

Mark Jamison

9:45 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Chris, Your condecending attitude aside,and out of respect for my elders I decided to look a little closer at the Tea Party and to try to determine if indeed there were similarities between them and the OWS movement. I went to www.teaparty-platform.com and read their "ten core beliefs." I can agree with all of them. This morning on CNBC former govenor Bill Richardson ( I know…he's a Dem. but lets move on) when asked if the Democratic party should embrace OWS stated that he felt there was too much "fringe element" to allow either party to "embrace" the movement but that the core beliefs of the central group were born of a "common frustration" by a diverse group of people that big government and corporate greed were destroying the middle class and that they must not be ignored. Sound familiar?
Point being that the two groups a great deal in common. One has a political bent while the other leans towards a more financial focus. But still with undeniably similar complaints and goals. What bothers me most about the tea party is the way they strong armed the GOP earlier this year and became an obstructionist force and ruined a chance for the two parties to negotiate a settlement when we needed it most. That has and will continue to bite us all in our collective ass for a long time to come. As for your other points, I don't get time to read much of anything, I'm one of those Lefty liberals that works two jobs but I do sometimes catch Hardball on MSNBC.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:21 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Mark, watching Hardball can be entertaining, but you really need to balance that with some less opinionated news or with a more conservative opinion show. It is amazing to watch the two extremes. It might really change your thinking and open your mind.

Chris Miller

9:53 pm on Monday, October 17, 2011

Nancy
I will not disagree with you on Bush his lack of interest in regulation. I will remind you that this started with Jimmy Carter and the community reinvestment act. Carter, Reagan, and Bush 41 all pretty much ignored that act. Bill Clinton was of a different mind. By forcing the banks to reinvest in the communities where they had a bank it created the atmosphere of de-regulation. Bush continued that model.I would point out to you that with Sarbanes-Oxley there were 28 new regulations that attempted to slow things down. In 2002 the Bush administration was before congressional committees asking for more regulation. Google or Bing the Bush administration and their failure to regulate the banks and Wall Street. I've pointed out to you before that the answer lies in the politics. of the game. You talk about corporations moving overseas and taxes set up that allow guys like Immelt to keep his money in Ireland. It was legislation by Congress that allowed that to occur Just as it was legislation that allowed the commercial and investment banks to merge. We had stopped that when it came up at the beginning of the Great Depression. The tax system is indeed terrible, 71K pages. Again it is Congress that fiddles with that. There has been discussion for years on a Flat Tax or National Sales Tax. There is a huge discussion going on in PA on school boards losing the right to use property for taxing. How about that for a cause. It is supported by the Tea Party

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:09 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Yes, thank you...But how do I delete the above comments (attempts)?

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:48 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Are we allowed to delete our own posts?

Patch_comments_icon

Tom Coombe

9:47 pm on Tuesday, October 18, 2011

I think so. I know some people have deleted their own comments in the past.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

6:53 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

The Occupy movement is now more than a month old and yet we have not heard from the powers that be about any sort of investigation of the tricksters in Wall Street...One would suspect that those in authority positions are on the payroll of these magicians making this noble movement all for naught...Elections cannot come soon enough...(I hope many votes won't be disenfranchised by Governor Corbett with his voter ID requirement...Pennsylvania is one of the states trying this shenanigan, so I heard).

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:23 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

I LOVE the voter ID requirement because I really fear voter fraud. Everyone should have some form of ID and have to show it to vote. I don't see what the big deal is.

Chris Miller

9:52 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

You did not and will not see an investigation of the people that you call tricksters for one of two reasons. There are no tricksters and the folks on Wall Street have contributed major money to the Obama campaign and many other campaigns. Ever watch the hearings Congress holds for the oil companies? After the congressmen hear what the oil execs. have to say they go out for drinks, dinner and campaign contributions. And this has lead you to the comment on PA having a voter ID. Why would you object to that? We already have a card we can use and that is our license. Do you really want people who are not registered to vote come in and vote despite the fact that they are here illegally here. This is not a shenanigan. Technically I believe that this can be done now since you are suppose to have your voter registration card on your person when you voter. Both poll watchers and others, the Judge of Elections, can ask to see this. If you do not have it you cannot voter. Are you familiar with what goes on in our own Commonwealth and in other places like New Hampshire. You can come from Massachusetts and go to New Hampshire and register saying that you are going to move to New Hampshire. You can then vote and move back home to Massachusetts. Citizens from Ohio can come to PA, register to vote, say they are going to move to PA, vote, go back to Ohio and have several years to move to PA--I think 5 years. This has been going on forever. Are you okay with this?

Chris Miller

10:17 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

I am happy that you found that you have something in common with the Tea Party. What troubles me about your group is that they have some interesting backers, such as George Soros, the leader of Iran, the American Nazi Party and Vladimer Putin. On top of that I understand that your group is oppossed to corporations yet yesterday some one complained that their $5,500 Mac Tablet was stolen. There are all sorts of corporate items there. In fact today's Express Times has a picture in the A section noting that your gorup had received over $430K in credit card donations and 82K in on site contributions. The fact that you call for higher taxes on the rich shows me how foolish you really are. How many times do economists, a wide variety of them, have to tell you that you can take all the money of the rich and you still will not have enough. Here is one more for you. Obama has promised to cut the payroll tax aka social security contribution at a time when we are low on funds there. Today's paper tells us that inflation is up to 3.5% and seniors will get that increase in their SS checks next year. But it willl be less then that because medicare will be more expensive. One last question. If the Tea Party had not stopped them from raising the debt ceiling where do you think you would be? Would there be another 21 year old girl from OWS telling me and others that we need to pay for her education and she referred to the Tea Party as teabaggers--nice girl..

Comment_arrow

Mark Jamison

11:03 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Okay quickly point by point… fisrt off they are not "my" group they are "a" group that's getting a lot of attention around the world. That's why we're having this "discussion". As for "who's there"…there are also TV cameras there…that means EVERYBODY shows up for the publicity. Try to look past that and see the basis for the protest. "The group is opposed to corporations"….come on …that's a grossly over generalized and incomplete statement…even for you. I think the actual sentiment is they are opposed to corporations having undue influence on government. a $5,500.00 Mac ? What was it in a gold case…and who cares ? They got some donations. So what. Not very much money in the grand scheme of things especially if "Soros" is involved as you say. I don't call for taxing the rich I call for taxing everyone fairly which i would assume would been a complete overhaul of the tax code. I also assume that would mean some sort of flat tax but I'm way out of my league there so I'll shut up. Social security…it's a mess that seems to have been going on for a long time through many administrations. I don't have any idea how to fix it.

Mark Jamison

11:15 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Medicare…maybe it's time to look at why medical attention costs so much. Debt ceiling…from what l know, and I'm sure that you'll agree it is little, we tax at approx 18% and we spend at approx 24%….an easy answer there..just a painful one…especially after Grover Norquist got all those Republicans to sign that pledge to never raise taxes again….man, where the hell did he come from ? As for me being "foolish" I am not. And it pisses me off when you say I am. I am another hard working American that sees things a little differently than you do. That's what makes our country great…remember?. And as for twenty year old children offering their ideas on how things should be….I have two of them and I have learned that they are like flies…always around…always making some sort of noise…but best off ignored..Peace.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

11:53 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Allow me a suggestion on Medicare's cost--law suits and regulations. Years ago if you suffered a neck injury one went to the local hospital that delt with that. If it was a head injury you went to that facility. Now all our hospitals have all the goodies to care for all the issues. I suggest that is so in order to avoid a law suit. We need Tort Reform. We do not have doctors who diagnose our illness. No we go to the hospital to be filmed, probed and poked. So do we raise the taxes or cut the spending. I favor the latter and I bet too. We need to attack a very common spending tactic known as baseline budgeting. Norquist has obvioulsy lost his mind on the tax matter. Personally I would not sign a no tax pledge because you might need to do that for serious things like build a school or repairing it. I thnk I am smart enough to say yes to this expenditure and no to this one--reimbursing teachers for getting administrative courses. By apologies for the foolish and yes we can exist as a nation with different beliefs and should be tolearnt on that. As to kids, well they get somewhat better with age, my only boy is 43,has no fear of working moving from his Gym to a garage repairing cars, I love him dearly, but the grandkids,, 2 boys, 2 girls are great and the two greatgrandkids, the 2 year old boy is already a cowboy and a 2 month old blue eyed black hair girl is just grand.

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

3:56 pm on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

I really wonder what Soros has done except be willing to contribute to a strong middle class? Koch brothers (only two of the three) purportedly deal illegally with Iran but no comment from the right. The Iranian president making comments immediately becomes guilt by association. Seems hypocritical and naive.

I am surprised at your kids comment although it is funny. Kids have never started an unjustified war (except maybe Caesar). If you are poor and a kid, you serve your country which defacto means that our kids do not have to serve. I would suggest that everyone who has not served pay a war tax to pay for the Iraq war. Great way to reduce the debt and pay real tribute to our youth. It is kids while in their twenties that have uncovered most of the basic science that made this country great. It is kids in their twenties that commit themselves to years of study and hard work to become engineers, scientists, lawyers and doctors. It is old folks that develop crystallized thinking where they remember good old days when gas was a quarter a gallon forgetting that they made a buck or two an hour then. It is the forty - fifty year olds who bitch about medicare that allows us old folks to bitch about our ills and medicine we take rather than lament about who died last week. I like twenty year olds telling me how things should be -- made my living listening to them.

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

10:31 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

BTW, my wife points out that your kids under 20 comment is more aptly applied to the old geezers who comment on the Patch

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

12:19 pm on Thursday, October 20, 2011

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14700

Soros enjoys bring down economies for fun trying to work towards a One World Order. He is not a friend trying to help the middle class. He might be trying to manipulate the middle class, but not help.

Chris Miller

11:33 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Mark
The president from Iran didn't show up, Putin did not show up. The American Nazi party did not show up. I don't believe that either of us would willingly be found with any of these folks. Keep in mind however that there are also problems with a Pakistani group and others denouncing the Jews and Catholics. These bad folks show up when things like this happen. Hopefully we will survive this yet again. As to the comment on the Mac and other corporate items- I find that very ironic and all I can tell you is that I heard that person hollering about their Mac. I'm a PC guy so don't know if tablets from MAC cost that much. You do not have to believe me but Soros is there. Have you taken a close look at this man. He is reallllllllly evil. I agree with you on putting a Flat or Fair tax. I belive that would be a better way. The tax system we have now has been used and abused and that is our fault. How does one get 71K pages in a tax code. As to social security I would sugget looking at the Galvenston Plan from Texas.I would suggest that we phase it out as well as Medicare and Medicaid. I find myself looking back and saying I can remember when I could get a pair of chinos for $4. or a pair of Keds sneakers for the same price. A good pair of kakhis. Bill's for example, can cost $100 a pair. Gas was 27 cents for Hi-Test. now $3.55. What has changed our products to cause the gigantic jump. Somehow I cannot bring myself to blame all of this on Wall Street.

Comment_arrow

Mark Jamison

11:53 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

I can't blame it all on Wall St. either. I think Wall St. has become the symbol for the movement largely because of it's roll in the melt down a few years ago and the indifferent attitude they seem to be taking to the whole thing. What bothers me most is that historically when the powers that be are able to get us fighting with each other they use the distraction to fleece us even further. So let's stop poking each other and we both turn around and start poking them. After all....it's OUR country...

Chris Miller

12:05 pm on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Mark
You are right on the money. But I must say I am not exactly sure of what Wall Street did. I know that the derivatives were bad but I have never seen someone cite them as illegal or pass a law making it illegal. I know the fools who touted that real estate never went down was a fool I do agree that we cannot allow the powers that be do like it when we fight. What we must do is start by taking over our local and state government with committess or organizations like the Tea Party. Or smalll groups meeting in our homes. We need to get candidates from are community to replace people at the local level who have been there for 30 years. I contend if we start making changes at the local level we will scare the heck out of the boys and girls in DC. It is indeed OUR nation.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

3:29 pm on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

The spin on the rich getting taxed on their income, is that this 1percenter would leave the market altogether, ergo, market would collapse!..What a drivel...After taxes, these behemoths would have more money left to play with and I don't believe for 1 second that they would disappear into thin air...I don't fear for the market crashing any more than I fear for the remaining 99% becoming absent in the scheme of things...Once this whole mess gets turned around (jobs for everyone after Obama's plan starts working, Wall Street brought to tight oversight), investments would come roaring in and we will all be one big family once again.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:14 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Wilfredo
Once again you are just plain wrong on this matter. This hate of rich people by those who feel that they are owed a living paid for by someone else has been with us for decades because we allow ourselves to be used by those who favor class warfar. The president who started this was none other then Franklin Roosevelt a man from an extremely rich family. Time, Newseek, National Review have all, at one time or another, pointed out that taking all the money from the rich, no matter the era, will not be enough to pay the bills you want to run up. And you wonder Wilfredo why I refer to you as one of the "ists". By the way, when is Obama's plan going to start working. I take it that you hear that even Harry Reid is not enamored by the new jobs bill.

Pirmigrin

11:46 pm on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

What do the Obama supporters and members of the OWS think of Obama having raised more money from Wall Street donors, than the GOP field COMBINED. Just curious. http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/10/obama_has_more_cash_from_wall.html

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daryl Nerl

1:08 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

I'd say that in this country any smart politician has no choice but to raise money where the money is. If you don't do that, you can't win. That applies to Democrats, Republicans and anyone else. Therein lies the central problem with our country's system, both political and economic. As Ice-T once said, "Don't hate the playa, hate the game."

Pirmigrin

7:29 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Daryl that is simply false. Candidates do not have to accept any money from corporations at all. Ron Paul raises all his money with online money bombs (consistently receiving more money from active military than any other candidate).

Nancy, I guess depending on what source (liberal or conservative media) you use you will get a different number, but regardless of that Obama takes a large majority of his camping donations from the very same big corporations and banks that the Occupy movement is against. Seems very hypocritical for the Obama Supporters/OWS members to support both.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:04 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Nancy
You can bet that Obama or his representative has already been to Wall Street for funds. This man is planning another billion dollar plus campaign purse..You think Wall Street is all about conservatives? I would sugget you rethink that.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daryl Nerl

11:06 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

You're right Pirmigrin. They don't "have to" accept money from corporations to run a campaign. Unless they want to win. That's one reason why Ron Paul is not taken seriously as a presidential contender by his own party's establishment. He will never be president. He is only a congressman because he has been an incumbent for more than 10 terms. If he were starting out of the gate fresh, he wouldn't even be that. I'm not saying that's how it should be. I'm saying that's how it is. Don't hate the playa. Hate the game.

Chris Miller

10:02 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Daryl
What ever gave you the idea that candidates must go to Wall Street for the money. They do that simply because it is there. However. I think what we really need to do is concentrate on revamping the entire primary and national election season. Here we are. over a year before the next general election and the whole system is up and running. Obama is on the trail in his bus pretending to be talking to the folks on serious issues so he can charge us for the trip yet we all know he is campaigning. We have a zillion debates scheduled and the Republicans are looking like fools specifically the two front runners. The polls are with us daily. Can we not put a system in place that there will be no primary campaign season until January 15 the year of the election. The primary season will finish on the last day of April.of said year We need to hold either a national primary or a primary divided into four quadrants of the country in April. The national season will begin on or about September 15 of said year and end on October 30. Election to be held as is current. All voters to present a picture ID and voter registration card. Congressmen and Senators may only accept money from their districts and state. Put a limit on amount raised for President and Congress. Just a suggestion feel free to comment.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daryl Nerl

11:16 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

You have some interesting ideas, Chris. I think you are right that the process is way too long, which therefore requires way too much money (and with money, comes influence) to sustain itself. Who do you think that serves? The people with the most money to throw at campaigns and politicians? Do you therefore believe that the people with all the money, and by extension the politicians, will ever allow real change to happen? Let's just say I'm skeptical.

Limeport Resident

10:21 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

If the claims were true that Wall Street supports Obama more, and as claimed here Obama is responsible for the Occupy movement, then the only conclusion that can be drawn is that Obama's integrity is beyond reproach. He is supporting the middle class while being supported by the 1%. I guess Wall Street wants an honest politician rather than unprincipled charlatans who need to be controlled by ever increasing bribes. Thanks Chris and Rosemary for pointing that out.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:39 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

You really think that the OWS is middle class when they complain about their 100K debt at their Ivy League School and the lose of their $5,500 MAC Tablet that I am told doesn't really exist but an OWS person said it so I assume it is true.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

12:40 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Limeport resident
Just an update. As of last evening Obama had gathered more money from his Wall Street pals then that collected by all the Republican candidates. Boy is is a good thing that Wall Street doesn't like Obama too much.

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

3:03 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Chris-- Thanks for the update. It would be much better if it were factual. Obama has received about a third less than Republicans. It is only if you combine DNC & his campaign money from Wall Street that it exceeds the Republicans. One can surmise: 1) It takes more to bribe a Democrat than a Republican; 2) It costs more to get a new lackey than one that has already been bought; 3) Wall Street understands that Democrats will do better for the economy and hence for them if they are in power. I don't understand the complaint, Citizens United says any entity can give as much as they want. Why would Obama refuse money if the opponents are then freer to slime him? But I forgot it is not about ideas but about money-- that is why Republicans are whining.

Comment_arrow

Wayne Schissler

3:38 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Limeport Resident said,

"Citizens United says any entity can give as much as they want."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Citizens United didn't say:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zh1SfOwE7dU

Chris Miller

10:26 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Limeport resident
You migt want to look at the history of George Soros. He is a man who likes to bring down nations and has the money to do it.

Chris Miller

10:33 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Rosemary
Most people are unaware of the facts pertaining to voter fraud. How much voter fraud will we have if we alllow voting by absentee ballot. How much do we have now? How many people in homes like Gracdale have been assisted with their absentee ballot vote. How many dead people have voted and still do to this day across the nation. We go to the polls, the folks in charge recognize us and we think all is well. I was involved a number of years ago with folks who had moved attempted to return to Bushkill Township to vote. We stopped that attempt. It can and does happen in both parties and all over the nation. Yes to voter ID and the voteer registration card. I take mine to all elections

Chris Miller

11:34 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Daryl
I didn't say it was going to be easy:). But you are correct there will be a problem to getting things past though we might be surprised. I think that if we limit those in Congress to getting money only at home,we will help our cause. I also would like to see Senators appointed by the State/Commonwealth as was the case with our formation. I realize the pitfalls of the past still exist but we have to make these elected officials beholding to their state and district and then it is up to us to monitor them We are the folks in charge of our Republic. Our Founders made that abundantly clear. Instead of watcing the big screen at home write, call or visit your representatives at all offices. Get out to your local governmental meetings. Yeah, I know, it is a real pain in the behind but do you really want your kids or grandkids to have to do this again in the near future. We cannot fall asleep yet again.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daryl Nerl

11:56 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

You say if "we limit those in Congress to getting money only at home," as if "we" can do that without an act of Congress. I'm not saying it's a bad idea. I'm saying "we" can't. And therefore it won't happen. Calling or writing your rep is always a good idea. But we all have our own lives to live, too. I have to say I vehemently disagree with seeing senators appointed by states. I don't see how that would make them more accountable to the people they are supposed to represent. If anything, it would make them less so, just more beholden to internal state party bosses and their funders.

Rosemary B

12:14 pm on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Many times the Koch brothers have been mentioned, with their ties to the tea party as an answer to complaints about George Soros ties to the OWS crowd. Here is an interesting article on George Soros and his love for Social Engineering and a One World Order.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14700
A Quote from the Article:
Soros also told “The Australian” that the world financial crisis was”stimulating” and “in a way, the culmination of my life’s work.”

Stimulating. Have you found the job losses, house foreclosures, and incredible national debt—stimulating? Me neither.

Chris Miller

12:36 pm on Thursday, October 20, 2011

As I initially stated it isn't going to be easy. To make the change with senators will require a Constitutional amendment that incldes revoking Amendment 16. Yes, when we originally appointed them there was corruption with "Senator Steel and Senator Coal" here in PA. We went from that to our Senators claiming they represented us only to have them going to the stars in California for money and ignoring us because they were now Senators of all the states. Thus their vote went to the folks with money across the nation while ignoring us here in PA. Bringing them home will allow us to keep them in their place as employees for PA. They become what you note in your last sentence only if we do not keep an eye on them just as we would any employee. At the same time I would suggest term limits. As to staying in touch with them, I would suggest that we do that to all of our representatives at all levels. I'm talking about attending meetings and taking your neighbors. Don't think that is important? How familiar are you with UN Agenda 21. I am also talking about running for office. Oh, I know, we all work hard, the job, the kids, the wife, the rest of the family, the yard, garden, and lots more to do. We have taken our eye off the ball because we are busy, we do not want to run, we dislike Washington, Harrisburg, Nazareth, Northampthon County. So make the decision to stay home and let others govern us and when their is a problem we blame the politicians as we sit on our hands?

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

2:59 pm on Thursday, October 20, 2011

At the recent Republican debate in Vegas, we heard hootin' and tootin' from the audience upon hearing the Pizza Man vilify the unemployed...Very sad display of bad behavior, not realizing that many of the jobless are tea partyers themselves...This is expected from people who subscribe to the bigoted homophobic intolerance...A gay soldier who is in the midst of war trying to protect Wall Street and America was nastily booed by similar crowd during an earlier debate.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

4:36 pm on Thursday, October 20, 2011

And who subscribes to " bigoted homophobic intolerance."? You are now just name calling and generalizing. Very disappointing.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

7:16 pm on Thursday, October 20, 2011

You know Wilfredo, if that is really your name, Rosemary has a point. How do you know who subscribes to what? Are they your friends and family. Shame on you for saying that. Rosemary hit the nail right on the head. You have been a real disappoiintment all along here. Good luck and I do hope you find a job soon.

Chris Miller

3:14 pm on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Wilfredo
And I just know you have a cite we can go too in order to verify what you have stated. Nice of you to name call Mr. Cain. Of course you would never do that if you had to face him.Don't know if you are aware of this or not but people are able to sign up and stay unemployed for 99 months just 5 months short of 2 years. History shows that the if the folks can stay out longer not looking for a job they will. Contrary to what you might believe that is not a good thing.

Chris Miller

7:12 pm on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Nancy
Is there something wrong with throwing out ideas? Are you looking for all of us to do group think? How do we make progress if we do that? I don't think I am insulting when I am citing historical fact. Putin, the Communist party and the American Nazi party are just a few of the folks who supported the OWS. I would assume that you would be opposed to these folks and organizations. They have been a scary bunch down through history. I know that some are surprised to find them here in the USA. but they have been with us for a long time and they are connected to OWS. Our kids who are not being taught history don't know how bad these guys are. I would have presumed you would have seen those within the group who admitted their association with them. I am sorry that you were unable to follow my points unfortunately that happens when one is spread out and limited in characters. As to your voting for the character in the White House, well I wouldn't dream that you would vote for anyone else. Who will I support? Since he was the only candidate to call on Ronald Reagan's 11 commandment and he has more brain power then the entire list of candidates and he is a native Pennsylvanian. I will be voting for Mr. Gingrich. Hope I surprised you.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

12:14 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Mr Gingrich is the smartest man in the room. Would LOVE to see him debate Obama!

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

12:12 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Unfortunately, the truth may very well be that these are the organizations that are actually driving the OWL movement and using them as the useful idiots. It has been done in the past.

Wayne Schissler

9:54 pm on Thursday, October 20, 2011

But it really doesn't matter.
Instead of this monumental grudge match maybe an honest look at their demands & statements would serve better:
Stop corporate bailouts, subsidies, and unfair regulations - sure we can all agree on that.
Bailout and subsidize all my favorite causes instead... -Lame-

All we need is some consistency in place of favortism.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

12:08 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Wayne
I would also suggest that what we needed to do was let those companies go bankrupt and follor the laws that do exist. Instead in true communist form our government saw the opportunity and took it. Unemployment is up, money supply is down and gowth is stagnant. In all honesty I see a two part program to all of this. The current occupiers will soon be going home. Bloomberg will not allow this for Christmas and the weather will be upon us shortly. But rest assurred they will be back in the spring. If we are looking for some targets for this mess allow me to suggest three" Franklin Raines, Tim Howard, and Jim Johnson. The folks can do the reseach.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:11 am on Friday, October 21, 2011

The Occupyers are out there pleading for jobs, fair treatment from the government and Wall Street...Obama offered a Jobs plan, money for cops, firefighters, teachers and others for starters but the Republican senators turned it down...Where are the jobs?..Oh, well.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

12:01 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Wilfredo
You might want to check on the Democrat Senators that voted against it. This bill will not pass in election year because it is a tax bill. Dems up for re-election will not vote for this bill. As had been reported this is a ploy by Obama so he can use it as a finger pointed in his attempt to be re-elected. You also might want to check who booed whom in the soldier case.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

12:08 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

unfortunately he offered the same old expensive plan that did not work in the past. Instead of working together he is offering plans that he knows won't be voted thru so he can then accuse the Republicans of being obstructionists. He is playing politics and mistaking the POTUS for a dictatorship, all while Campaigning across the country on his big bus. He needs to learn how to lead and compromise.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

12:36 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Wilfredo
I have always found that if I wanted a job that it worked alot better if I went to the person who had advertised a job. I have walked into businesses and been hired. I acquired my real estate license and have been involved in that business both full and part time since 1986. I went to college and became a teacher for 32 years. I worked at a variety of jobs and never once found out about the job at a protest against my government or people who angered me. I would think that the same process would work today.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:25 am on Friday, October 21, 2011

Rosemary B...Who are the bigots?..The last time I heard was the Republicans would repeal Don't ask, don't tell staute that was just passed in Congress once they control the government...Not to mention other gay rights like same-sex marriage...We heard the audience booing at the gay soldier one sad night...This attitude is bigoted, I think...I hope you are not one of them, Ms B.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

12:03 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

I am just offended and disappointed that you seem to be painting all conservatives and Republicans and Tea Party members with the same brush. It is like me saying you are a non-thinking idiot following the party line like a sheep just because you happen to be a liberal!

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

1:05 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Why you can't paint all Republicans or Conservatives with the same brush and why I favor Rick Santorum over some of the other candidates

."One loud boo was followed by several others. Many Republican commentators condemned the catcalls. On Friday, Rick Santorum, the candidate who ended up taking the question, condemned the negative response in a follow-up interview with Fox News.

“I condemn the people who booed that gay soldier,” said the former senator for Pennsylvania. “I have to admit I seriously did not hear those boos. . . . But certainly had I, I would’ve said, ‘Don’t do that. This man is serving our country and we are to thank him for his service.’ ”"

Brunell

8:13 am on Friday, October 21, 2011

A system that takes from the working class, and the current administration wants to take from the working class, and gives that money away without the receivers of that money trying to better themselves, and then pursues the small businesses and their employees to continue this effort while vilifying them is UNSUSTAINABLE. Is that so hard to see? If the owner of our company is not able to make a profit, which he has to risk his entire savings and home to sustain, why would he continue to keep the 85 employees he currently has hired? At some point he will cash out and retire! What is wrong with you guys. It is not about class, greed, wall street, it is about the very principles this country was founded on. Our nation was the very best. Why? My grandfather immigrated from Italy. He wanted to speak English. He wanted to be an Americian. He worked his entire life, payed his taxes, owned a home, and, oh yea, raised a family that also worked, paid taxes, and continued to make a better life for themselves. No handouts, no help but from themselves and each other. This current path is unsustainable and is the end of a great nation. I just hope we wake up and stop fighting for and about the wrong things. Our current President wishes to divide us. That is dangerous. He is breaking us from within. I intend to fight for the country my grandfather fought for......please wake up.....

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

12:02 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Brunell
Thank you for your wisdom

Comment_arrow

Brunell

1:44 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

This is the equation:
Opportunity=self betterment=higher wages
Not one person blogging would pass up a raise. Is that greed? Come on people, it is part luck but mostly the ability to make or manage something that leads to opportunity and higher wages. That is how it works for everyone. So how does this fit into ALL of the posts here? Lets unite for betterment, that is, the ability to make something, start a business, and yes, provide raises to employees that deserve an increase. The equality our forefathers fought for was the equality for opportunity. Not all men are equal. Would you let a high school student fly a 747 to Florida? Why not, he deserves to sit in the captains chair. Different abilities warrant different compensation. So how does this fit into the "handouts"? The owner of our company is the most generous person I know. But remember, he is generous to the deserving. Sorry, that is how it works. If someone is in need, and is trying their best to make themselves and their situation better, they get a break. Let the small businesses offer the opportunity. That is how it works. Hey, you protestors, nothing is stopping you from opening a company, making something or providing a service, and yes, cashing a check and hiring more of your friends and neighbors. If we do not return to this principle, we are doomed! I am not a doom and gloom person, I never have been involved in politics prior to last year, but we can not continue on this path.

Chris Miller

1:00 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Rosemary
Nancy supports Obama because she is a Progressive Republican. We have realize that they are still with us. I do not believe they still have large numbers in the party. Acturally what we as conservatives should do is go back to our revolutionary roots as "classical liberals" The Founders and Framers would fall into this category.

Chris Miller

1:47 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Rosemary
Our foes have been among us for years. I would not be surprised to see an infiltration of communists here. What we have is a combination of the impact of the unions on public and private employees and the leftists from the 60's taking over the field of education in the public schools and colleges. We are no longer students. We are pampering kids by holding their hands through school. They need to be curious about things. When was the last time you spoke to a curious teen looking to knowledge and planning his future.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

3:35 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Rosemary B...Didn't you proclaim yourself a proud Conservative?..Be careful, if you don't toe the Conservativ/Republican line, you might be labeled by the drugster Rush Limbaugh as a RINO...Your party just despises the gays and lesbians, period...No gays in the Armed Forces, no same-sex marriages...True or false...Either you denounce this ideology or accept the fact that you are one card-carrying follower...There's the broad brush.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

4:16 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

I must have lost my card! I don't remember signing anything saying that I had to despise gays and lesbians, period, as you seem to think.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

5:17 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Wilfredo.
Rosemary is one otf the nicest people you would ever hope to meet. What's with the demand to her or anyone to put up or shut up. I think you would find that the nation has moved more toward the libertarian position. Who cares if you are gay. So gays are in the military. They have been there since the beginning of time. Same sex marriage, well I must be honest here, no because it will open the door for a whole lot of problems like more then one spouse marriages. As to the nasty old conservatives. you might want to check out the Log Cabin Republicans. And Wilfreto, we are not care carrying anythings. Stop the drama you jsut sound silly.

Limeport Resident

3:40 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

The one good thing about blogs like this is when the are dominated by a couple of people, they are fun to read because they reveal a lot about them. For example, Chris immediately postulates quilt by association so anyone reading Ayres, Obama, Krugman, Wright must be a subversive. Yet the only books he quotes with pleasure are Mein Kampf and Das Capital. What should we read into that other that he likes to read? He stopped teaching history in 1986. Should we infer the paranoia with cold war issues is that he never read any history after that? He talks about how easy it is to find a job applying as he did. In 1954 when he got out of college, there were many jobs for each candidate. I remember turning away 10's of recruiters because I did not have time to go out to hear their spiel at some fancy restaurant. At the same school today, graduates get 1 or 2 offers and are grateful. When there are 100's of candidates for each application, it is much harder to get a job let alone move up the ladder than in the 50's and 60's when any incompetent (not meaning you Chris) could get a good job. A Realtor license in the 1980's was an easy way to a comfortable life, today it is a easy way to the poor house. Things change -- today the country needs to starting thinking about what a middle class should look like. Chris has crystallized thinking patronizingly welcoming to our country people who do not need that, they deserve people to listen to their ideas Then America will be great again!

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

5:05 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Limeport Resident
I believe one should read a wide variety of books. I do have the president's books lined up for the next read. Never knew Wright wrote a book. Mein Kampf and Das Capital just a refresher. Stopped teaching history? Technically in 1999 but I still have youngsters to indoctrinate. Graduated in 1966 from Moravian. Jobs were a lot easier to find. My point is this--if one is truly looking for a job why are they at a pep rally? Why are they in a place where fellow protestors are engaging in unseemly acts. Why should anyone take them seriously about anything particularly getting a job.Getting a job is tougher today but not impossible. I actually feel sorry for these kids who are in debt up to their eyeballs but how is that the fault of Wall Street and the Banks. If you didn't have the bucks start in a Community College or a less expensive education. And while you are at it ask yourself why college is costing you an arm and two legs. Have you considered an apprentice position with someone? Are you selecting a major that will still be there when you graduate. As to a Realtor's License being a way to an easy life well let me just say that you need to see what we do and more importantly what it costs to do that job then and even more so today. Are problem today is a simple one, we have reared youngsters to believe that they are in charge, that they should have it all, and someone else should pay for it.

Brunell

3:53 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Nancy, where did I mention killing the FDA or EPA. How about the Federal Government utilizing its power to vary its standards from market to market. The mining industries run off water is held to a higher standard than your drinking water. So your local water utility is allowed to discharge for human consumption water that contains higher PPMs of monitored materials than the mining industries run off water? That is an example of the government utilizing its power to force its drill and dig somewhere else plan. Did I post Fear and Paranoia and Conspiracy? Conspiracy is done in secret, theses things are being done IN THE OPEN. You think we don't want clean air or drug regulations but what we want is the regulations to be concerned with safety, not agenda. That is not the case. My question is how do we pay for it all. So take all our money, take all wall streets money, take all small and medium sized business money, give it away...then what. You get to do that once. Please think about how to sustain the plan. Okay, how do you stimulate the businesses and create a growing economy? Lets hear it? At some point you have to listen to the businesses. They hire, they pay huge amounts of tax, and they stimulate the economy. If you don't want to listen to them then I suggest you come up with an idea, bring it to market, meet the regulations, sell it, hire employees, procure health insurance for those employees, and stimulate the economy....there is no other way.

Chris Miller

5:57 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Limeport Resident
You are correct on the matter of contributions to Obama from Wall Street.

Limeport Resident

7:05 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Brunell offers a set of equations that I totally agree with. However, when one looks at the variables one needs better definition:
Opportunity <= Father's wealth
The best predictor of how rich you will be is the wealth of your father. The top ten percent and Ivy League degree are highly correlated (except Moravian). Bottom 50-90% not so much. Bottom 50% very few. Going to Ivy League or top technical school like MIT, CalTech, Berkley, John Hopkins or top schools like Duke, Lehigh tremendously increase your chance of being successful. Opportunity -- increases the richer your Dad is. The equation that is valid is Opportunity == Higher wages. Self betterment == higher wages-- I agree People need to do the best they can. But this is truly vague-- does a person who learns to be greedy and manipulate others and is ruthless deserve to get ahead of others who work as hard but are more altruistic? Doctors without borders save many more lives than those whose goal is to maximize income by seeing as many patients and prescribing as many tests as possible. Which has done a better job at self betterment? Higher wages-- today the best path is to invent Google or Microsoft; I say they deserve it-- I can blog crap all day because of them. Financial guys who foreclose when they do not own deeds, make money on collecting insurance on stock that they sell to gullible investors, I don't think deserve higher wages. Relying on bosses bad! Betterment to hope for charity? Pay me what I deserve.

Limeport Resident

7:29 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Chris:

I agree that it is a good thing to read a variety of books. Mein Kampf teaches as much as the bible. However, one needs perspective obtained by other readings. The bible teaches morality; Mein Kampf shows how perverted humans can become. Rev. Wright of course did not write a book but did have sermons that one can read or view. Maybe, a lesson on perversion of religion?
Apprenticeships are great -- look at Germany. Their exports are greater than USA because people avail themselves of skill building. But I would like for American to aspire to greatness and have resources to do so!
I disagree with you entirely about today's youth. My kids, the x-generation, fit that self absorbed model more, but they ended up just fine making more than I ever hoped for and helping people. This generation seems to be realizing that they are being taken advantage of. More power to them. They don't want a handout but want a fair chance. I am convinced they will win if we rebuild a middle class.
I think indoctrinate is a bad choice of words for your kids. I am sure you meant that you wished to expose them to your experiences in life so they can become better Americans. Someone with such strong feelings will be a strong factor in their lives. Whether they agree with you or not does not matter, you will have exposed them to ideas that can only make them better people. Looking forward to my grandkids and your grandkids and greatgrandkids making this country better for all.

Brunell

8:20 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Limeport Resident, you missed the point. First, most of the people who own small to intermediate business that I have been exposed are not from wealthy families. The owner of our company grew up in Salisbury. Hardly a wealthy area. He put himself thru engineering school by working as a plumber in the summer and breaks. Your theory and numbers are not what I have been exposed in my industry. Once again, I ask you, how do we stimulate growth, jobs and opportunity by increasing taxes, regulations, and bigger government? How do we sustain the current administrations spending habits? That is the simple question. Those of you who support bigger government have already told the rest of us how you feel about wall street, big business, greed, and capitalism however, what is your plan to stimulate growth for the economy? Please, help me see your viewpoint.

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

9:42 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

Brunell-- small business owners you describe are in the same boat as the middle class. they suffer mainly from lack of demand. If economy measured by GDP the equation is GDP= comsumer spending+ Other expenditures
Consumer spending= consumer income - consumer saving.
If consumer income goes down or consumer saving goes up, consumer spending goes down. The question for you if consumer spending (~70% of GDP) is down and consumer saving is up ( because of bad economy fears), who is going to pickup spending? Businesses? Only if they want to fail since there is low consumer demand. If you can't sell a product why should you spend more? One way is to start spending by the government. This will stimulate private business, create jobs, and jump start the economy. Stimulus was not enough except to stop ride down to depression. I believe in government role to maintain a level playing field for all businesses and people. Conservatives only plan is to ask what the plan is even when the plan by progressives is clear and would work if allowed to be implemented.

Comment_arrow

Wayne Schissler

10:16 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

More government spending intended to stimulate the private sector... more failed Keynesian policies. Even when when these tactics are employed they are mismanaged... observe the last stimulus. PA receives it's chunk of Federal money and it's channeled into the Education Department - State funds are reduced and Federal funds make up the difference. Then the teacher/admin/staff contracts are negotiated as if there is no economic downturn - raises as usual with the rest of us in the wealth creating private sectors with cutbacks, layoffs, & no raises.
http://ccnasd.org/where-did-the-money-go/

All this did not contribute an iota to the private economy, it made it worse and created bad feelings between taxpayers and unionized gov't employees. And if the stimulus went to infrastructure it would have been only slightly better. Ever see the breakdown on how much taxpayer money (actually deficit spending) is spent to create each job? It's obscene!

Comment_arrow

Brunell

2:28 pm on Saturday, October 22, 2011

Limeport Resident
Spending money on infrastructure is a good idea, however, that is NOT how the stimulus was spent. In addition, how much money is set aside for DBE and WBE participation on a federal project? How about the prevailing wage for an electrician in most semi-metropolitan areas? Try 10-20% set aside and $50-90 dollars an hour. Don't you think we need to make that money go a bit farther? Don't you think we should let the market set the wages and not the unions? We can not continue to forget about economics. Supply and demand....skill levels...etc. forget about the current administrations idea for stimulus!!!

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:17 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

GLOBAL SPRING...How did we get here?..I believe that when the Wall Street operators were sat free (deregulations), capitalism went berserk, global financial crisis happened, citizens got frustrated, Global Occupations...This is another legacy of the Bush administration...Many bad things happened during his watch and Barack Obama was left holding the bag..."HE MUST FAIL AT ALL COST...THE PUBLIC BE DAMNED!"...Talk about End of the World (for the disenfranchised anyway).

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:07 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

Obama has been in charge for almost 3 yrs and has gotten major spending, healthcare, and banking legislation thru. These have also changed things in a very big way for buisinesses and not nessasarilly good for hiring. And we won't even talk about the things he is trying to change thru regulations. It is time to stop blaming Bush and start taking responsibility and maybe try things different if his way is not working out so well. You act as if none of his agenda has been accomplished! And who is your quote from? I try not to "quote" things that are inaccurate.

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

9:48 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

Wilfred: You can attribute the sentiment for the quote to Mitch McConnell.Rosemary does not quote things that are inaccurate, she just makes up stuff and attributes them to Progressives.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

9:51 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

Now when, exactly, did I do that? I always try to cite the articles that I get my FACTS from, just to avoid accusations such as yours.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

10:08 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

“The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.” ~Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader, (R-Ky.), October 2010

I believe he wants Obama to be a one term president because he strongly feels his POLICIES are BAD for this country. Funny, I have not found anything saying "the public be damned" as Wilfredo posted. but I will keep looking.
http://www.prunejuicemedia.com/2010/classic-quote-from-sen-minority-leader-mitch-mcconnell-r-ky/

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

10:20 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

http://www.tevitroy.org/8245/mcconnell-under-fire
"McConnell spokesman Robert Steurer defended his boss' comments.
"Ending the Obama administration's liberal agenda as soon as possible is Sen. McConnell's top political priority," Steurer said. "The American people are clamoring for a focus on jobs and righting our economy … and that's McConnell's focus for the next two years."
The Republican National Committee did not respond to a request for comment.
But at least one political observer said McConnell's goal should come as no surprise.

"Of course, Republicans want to make Obama a one-term president — just like the Democrats had hoped to make President (George W.) Bush a one-term president," said Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics.
Still, he said, McConnell's aspiration "was poorly worded."
That is a legitimate goal of the opposition party, but it was undiplomatic to suggest it was the top priority," Sabato said."

At worst, Mc Connell was undiplomatic in his wording. Something I am sure Dems were guilty of when they were trying to make Bush a one term president 6 yrs earlier.

Rosemary B

8:11 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

The Occupy people have been asked to get rid of their encampments for health and safety (and probably budgetary!) reasons in several cities now and are refusing to leave! Are they are inviting violence so that they can play the victim, once again? They have made their points and wasted millions in taxpayer dollars. It is now time for them to go home and put pressure on their reps in Washington for the change they want!

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

9:53 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

Interesting that in the USA we are concerned about inciting violence by government because people are asserting their rights -- no wonder China, Syria, Iran like to point to this as justification for their reign of terror. In New York, the only thugs are the cops. I wonder how much freedom is worth, Rosemary seems to think a month of assembling is enough freedom for Americans.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

10:01 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

They are still allowed to assert their right to assemble and protest. They just need to take down the ridicules (my opinion) encampments. I totally support freedom to assemble and free speech to protest, but others have rights to and these encampments are starting to impede on other citizens and are wasting taxpayer money. Look at the bigger picture and how spending the money on these stubborn protesters will cripple these cities budgets. It is not just about them. Their are others in the 99% percent who are being adversely effected by their encampments.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

11:24 am on Saturday, October 22, 2011

Rosemary B...How would you characterize your party's obstructionists' strategy just to cripple our president so he can't do a darn thing and make him look bad...If that attitude does not look like Public be damned, I don't know what is...The poor guy is trying his utmost best to bring the country back from the abyss, brought on by the disastrous Bush economic policies but, unfortunately, Obama has to get through Mitch McConnell and Company who'd like nothing more than to get rid of the Democrats from governing...Sabato says it's two-way street...Fine...Checks and balances are democratic systems to prevent overreach by one party...There is a job plan out there to hire people but it is beyond my comprehension the negativism of the entire Republican Senate (with a couple of Blue Dog Democrats) other than make him fail...It's PUBLIC BE DAMNED then...That's the way I see it, Ms B.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

12:21 pm on Saturday, October 22, 2011

My original problem was how you put it in quotes, as if someone actually said "THE PUBLIC BE DAMNED"! The Democrats and Republicans have very deep differences in how to fix the problems this country has. Our system of checks and balances is working. The problem is neither side is talking to the other or looking for middle ground. I don't know what the solution to that would be.Of course the Republicans want to get rid of the Democrats in power. Just like the Dems wanted to keep Bush from being re-elected. It is the nature of our political system. Unfortunately I don't see many adults in the room looking out for the American people.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

8:46 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Wilfredo'
WOW, that first sentence sounds like it came right out of Das Kapital. If you feel this way about Republicans how do you feel about those Democrats in the Senate who voted against a segment of his so called Jobs Bill that is really a Tax Bill. What do you suppose Mitch McConnell promised those Dems. Please enumerate what Obama has done to resolve our situation? Of course we all know that the Democrats never obstructed that old meanie G.W. Bush. particularly when the likes of Kerry and others denounced Saddam Hussein and then turned around and said they never supported the war. That was a good thing. By the way, what do you think about Congress having to issue a Declaration of War before we go to war.?

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

5:52 pm on Saturday, October 22, 2011

Rosemary B...The quote is mine and mine alone and quit putting spin on it...Admit that the Republicans are just bent on defeating Obama "AT ALL COST"...The programs you enumerated that passed were those before McConnell came to the podium and recited his pledge about making Obama a one-term president...Since then, everything the president put on the table were laid by the wayside, so to speak...They appeared too good for the country, and hence, success for Obama...How on earth creating employment for cops, teachers, first responders be rejected when the Republicans had been clamoring for JOBS all along...Infrastructure needs fixing...Why vote it down?..And please refrain from telling us that the president controlled both houses, when I have never seen so many Senate filibusters from your party just to block many proposals by the president for the good of the country, hence "THE PUBLIC BE DAMNED" (quotes are mine)...Checks and balances work if done without malice...Who is the adult looking for the American people now?

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

6:38 pm on Saturday, October 22, 2011

Like I said, there is no adult in the room looking out for the country. Obama puts out plans he knows won't pass and is not interested in negotiating. And neither is the other side. This is a major problem. And, in case you don't know, the Senate is controlled by Harry Reid and the DEMOCRATS. This bill is more of the big government spending that has not helped the economy in the past and looks like another big pail of money wasted. The definition of crazy is trying the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

8:27 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Wilfredo
So now we can call you the INTIMANATER. Where do you, of all people, get off taking swats at someone like Rosemary B.

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

10:35 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Obama is the adult. It takes two to negotiate. Who will he negotiate with? I thank my lucky stars that Reid is in control of the senate. Otherwise we would have 88 anti-abortion laws that the house passed but no jobs. The spending has helped tremendously. It stalled depression even if Republicans limited its extent. It was mainly a tax cut bill which doesn't help at all but that is what negotiating with Republicans does. I agree that crazy is trying to do right by the American people over and over again and expecting the Republicans to help.

Mary Anne Looby

6:58 pm on Saturday, October 22, 2011

If all of you had taken the time and effort it took to argue back and forth about this subject and used it for something positive, the world would have been a better place. You have beaten a dead horse to death and back and still you will not get off the subject. I am now convinced that all you care about is your 15 minutes of fame for being the most long winded bunch of sorry assed individuals on the planet. Please stop, you are boring us with your political agendas.

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:18 am on Sunday, October 23, 2011

Addendum: The debate has gotten off the topic of Wall Street occupation...Let's focus on it...Political discussions can be had in another thread.

Comment_arrow

S

9:35 am on Sunday, October 23, 2011

Thank you Mary Anne - that's the most intelligent comment I've seen in this thread. Neither side in this endless back-and-forth is going to convince the other to "see the light." There are plenty of other spots on-line where you can incessantly argue politics. It would be nice to see some discussion here about local issues and events.

Comment_arrow

JR

5:55 pm on Sunday, October 23, 2011

The voice of reason----Mary Anne Looby!
My compliments to you.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:16 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Sorry we differ, but I have learned a lot by participating and hope others have as well. I think the gaining and sharing of knowledge is a positive way to spend ones time and does not make them "sorry assed". If you are bored, stop reading.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

8:17 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Mary Ann
I have not seen anyone here object to making a point. Tell me what could we have done that would have made the world a bette place to live based on the OWS issues, whatever they are. . I would recommed a discussion that would have the protestors look at their responsibilities as they pertain to there responsibilities. I realize that many of you believe that some how these people who defecated in the park, used private bathrooms as their own, put up tents on private properties, engaged in sex on tarps, are just playful children who are now in debt for college and want me to pay for it. They have no idea that their "rights" are not absolute. They like to discuss those rights yet fail to take on their responsibilities and duties that go along with those constitutional rights. I, and I assume others, would like to talk about that on this cite.

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

10:26 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Mary Anne:
I appreciate you putting in the same thought every few comments. If one is beating a dead horse back, then I would say it is a positive thing. Long winded-- yes. Convince someone else in America these days-- probably not. If it is a typo using the word sorry rather than sore, we might have a point of agreement. Like an addict, you may be bored but you still keep coming back! Thanks to the Patch for hosting this site.

Chris Miller

8:02 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

John and S.
I would suggest that you could have contributed at any time along the way. I would like to konw why politics would not be an issue.here. We have a government who through Bloomberg's girlfriend received stimulus money that went to the owner of the park. He in turn storpped the closing of the park and allowed the mess to continue. The money given was from you, me and countless other Americans But that's not a political issue. Let us know wat you would like to discuss. How about "Are the protesters breaking thhe law and isn't it the duty and responsibility of the NYC Police to remove them from the park."

Chris Miller

8:03 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Wilfredo
It is nice to see that you are such a stand up guy who gets on board immediately.

Chris Miller

8:22 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Rosemary
You are correct that we have a child in the White House and let's keep in mind that he had a good laugh at our expense when he told us that the stimulus did not work all that well because the shovel ready jobs just were not all that shovel ready. I would sugget to every single American that before the 2012 election gets a copy of the books that he has written, particulary Dreams of My Father, It is a very hard book to read because it is insipid drivel. But it will tell you all about this man.

Chris Miller

8:58 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Limeport Resident
Your comments on the OWS and their protest and how countries like China use it to support their reign of terror is correct. Keep in mind that our rights are not absolute never have been and never will be. We are great at espousing those rights but we constantly forget that there are responsibilities and duties that go with those rights. You have a right to be secure in your home but if you are holding your family hostage there the police have the duty and responsibility to get you out of your home to save your family and any other hostages. The protestors have no right to erect tent cities, perform sex on tarps and in public and destroy a park whether public or private. We have other responsibilites affecting others such as educating your children, that is your responsibility not the states. If you want to educate you kids at home you can do that. You can also send them to public or private schools. The public schools of course see your kids as dollars.

Limeport Resident

10:16 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Chris:
Great to see that old folks still can have an interest in sex! Performing sex on tarps? Wow! Remember that China has cause when the government attacks its citizens on the same pretext as China attacks theirs. Even the NYPD Internal Affairs agreed that the thug police officer was out of line. Arguments in absurdum have a place, but then based on your police example, do they have a right to invade your home because you are having sex on a tarp?
One can fight for rights. The police can arrest you for whatever they feel, with just cause, is a violation of law. The arrested have a right to a speedy trial (also being violated) where they can have a jury decide on the validity of the police action.
You say parents have a right to educate their children. If they teach them sharia law (as Republicans portray it not as it is), you must be fine with that. If they teach them civil disobedience, you must be fine with that. Both public and private schools see kids as dollars. It is the parents duty to make sure that regardless what they see them as, they educate them so that are productive citizens. I pay taxes for schools not so my kids will be educated but that we have a good supply of citizens that can strengthen the country.-- I like my $5500 computer; I like the fact the sufficient kids will grow up to stand up for the middle class. Maybe they can invent even better tarps!
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Gandhi

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

2:08 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2011/10/24/occupy-wall-street-sex-at-zuccotti-park/?mod=e2fb

I believe the "sex on tarps" comment refers to articles such as this that reveal what life is like in Zucotti Park.

Chris Miller

10:49 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Limeport
So you will be fine when they stop at your home to tear up your yard and do what they want to do on said yard. That is a fantastic Progressive outlook on the world. Obvioulsy you are fine with just having the right to do something but don't believe you should be a responsible citizen. You really do not understand the difference between public and private responsibilities, eg. you can get drunk in your home but public drunkeness is a no no. If your private responsibilities end up in the yard and disturbes the neighbors you just might find yourself being arrested. So have your sex on a tarp in your home but don't roll out onto your front lawn the neighbors just might object. The point you missed is that we tend to ignore our personal responsibilities. You might want to check William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England as well as the Writings of Thomas Jefferson on this issue. As to the education of our children, we should be about educating intelligent people. They are a specific group and here I would suggest Alfred Jay Nock's The Theory of Education in the United States. We have gotten off track with our educational objectives because we have strayed from our original intent. Today we educate children so they can get a job. There are kids out there who went to school and college only to come out and find that the job no longer exists. Now what do we do.

Chris Miller

11:14 am on Monday, October 24, 2011

Obama is the adult in the room? His own people had to get him off his duff to do anyting other then golf or vacation. As to Senator Reid, I believe he voted against either the entire new jobs bill or one of the segments of that bill. I need to double check that. As to the matter of abotion or what is now known a the major from of birth control in America, I would like an answer to a question that plagues me. We have managed to eliminate some 50 million Americans who could be out there working,inventing, finding cures etc. For some reason we do not want our own yet we are okay withh allowing illegal immigrants into the naition. It is the major item I fault Reagan for when he gave amnesty to them. If you read the paper over the weekend there is now a question about the natutral born citizenship of Jaindl and Rubio. Apparently neither are natural born citizens. That will disqualify both men from running for the presidency. For some reason the so called birthers are now more radical because they pointed out these matters that are supposedly true. Point out something that is unconstitutional and you are a radical . Does this make sense to you>

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

12:17 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

The answer to your question is simple. People have freedom in this country to choose it is a Democratic and democratic principle. I would not like to see a government mandated baby factory in USA. I don't know why your ideas are so much like China's -- tell people they must have children or are limited to x children same thing. However, from a policy perspective, the country cannot find jobs for the people we have, how will we find jobs for an extra 50 million. To deny immigration doing menial jobs and low rates, seems to require at least 11 million of them to be in those trades. You and I differ in personal freedom. I believe a woman has the right to choose, a family has the right to determine how many children they will have, and adults have a right to seek redress of grievances. So feel all of these rights are limited to what government restricts them to.
The problem with birthers is that they are radical. They make up facts and they are always wrong.Being a liar or fabricator of truth is radical. Rubio was born in Miami Jindal was born in Baton Rouge. It is only the birthers that make the claim. Seemingly it is because neither of his parents with American citizens at the time of their birth. They argue about natural born citizens clause in constitution. Next kids born by IVF will be denied being President. Birthers are nuts.. period

Limeport Resident

12:14 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

Playing golf, taking a vacation seems like a lot more productive ventures than dealing with anti-middle class Republicans. Reid votes against a bill because of procedural requirements when a motion will be defeated. On a majority vote, every bill of Obama's would have passed. If the outcome isn't clear then the Democrats would have all voted for it. Congress is great theater.

Chris Miller

1:13 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

Limeport
You do know that we are a Republic not a democracy. Were we the latter we would need the entire population in order to do business. Under a Republic we elect our leaders and tell them what powers they have. By our own rules a decision by the people on abortion has never occurred. We never voted on that issue at the federal or state level. We have many presidnets who have used their position to circumvent the laws using executive orders that have allowed our troops to be sent to Libya and Uganda. One might ask had we voted on abortion what might have been the outcome and the same can be said for our troops. When it comes to the troops and war both parties have done away with Declarations of War by Congress. Where did I state that people should not have children? Why would one opt for an abortion rather then practice birth control . Does NOW and Plan Parenthood give a medal for having an abortion. . Might not those within the 50M slain have come up with ideas that would have been major industires. A person crossing the border illegally is a criminal. Have you thought about the possibility that these illegal aliend might be stopping an agticultural machine revolution, much like the cotton picker or the Deere steel plow. With regard to Rubio and Jindal, I like both men but if they are not natural born citizens, they may not be president. We told Schhwartznager that and we need to do the same with the above. We all know the potential repercussions.

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

2:48 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

A Republic -- no kidding! Because we have no monarch or because one person does not have the same vote as others? Or is it because women do not have the same guaranteed rights as men? Abortion laws have ebbed an tied for years in the USA. Roe vs Wade has permitted women to make decisions about their lives but it is slowly being usurped. Seems to me that countries that have a democracy in fact permit women to control their destinies. Declaration of War -- I tend to agree. But does it matter if an illiterate and cowardly sector of the population, who has more voting power, is able to scare their representatives into voting for war anyway?

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

3:01 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

I did not say you are against having children. I said that you seem to be in favor of the state dictating reproductive rights as in China.NOW and Planned Parenthood do not give medals, they just lobby for equal women's rights and in the case of PP provide women with information so that they can chose how to run their lives. Your "infinite number of monkeys typing on an infinite number of computers would produce all the great literature argument" to provide an agricultural revolution seems a stretch. Possible - yes; probable- no. The illegal immigration issue on its own is something we can agree on. A country should be able to determine how many immigrants they allow. Problem is that we did not restrict them. Pragmatically, what do you do?
Rubio and Jindal are natural born Americans; Schwartznager was not. Big difference. Our loss of privacy has occurred with Americans in the Presidency. I am not sure what the repercussions would be if people could choose who they want for President unrestricted.

Mary Anne Looby

1:31 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

@Limeport resident, I don't keep coming back. I have not read any the posts in weeks. What is frustrating is trying to get some work done and having to delete this ongoing rant from my inbox multiple times per day. 543 posts since 10/2/2011, 6 are mine begining 10/13/2011 - 10/24/2011, 3 of which are imploring you to stop! I doubt that a thinking person would consider this "putting in the same thoughts, every few comments". Sorry assed was not a typo, and I still believe you are trying to get yourselves in the Patch book of records. Your (all of you that participate) name calling, rude comments and political opinions are soooo boring. Now, please, go away!

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

3:09 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

Mary Anne -- It is my sole desire to get in the Patch book of records -- my life will then be fulfilled. Thanks for adding to the count.
I also like to read the comments, many of which I think are wrong. But all of the people have added to their comments another bit of their perspective. Just because we will never agree or we push the other in sometimes an unflattering way does not mean that the discourse is not valuable.
Nancy gives good advice. One does not need to receive the comments. Looking forward to your fourth imploring comment..

Comment_arrow

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

3:26 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

Mary Anne...I am aware of what you are trying to do and I appreciate it, but shouldn't this be a job for the editor?..If you are, then go ahead, flag 'em...Otherwise, you have the option of ignoring these posts...I also take exception of the blanket statement of "sorry assed bloggers" who do their mantras laced with unnecessary, uncalled for name-calling, rude comments...It is not my nature...But if I did, those were in response to what were directed at me...Lastly, please forgive my grammar...I am still learning, coming from a non-English speaking country...You are always welcome to offer your take on the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Chris Miller

3:56 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

Limeport Resident
I do not believe in imposing a number of children.as China does. I do believe that a child that has been conceived should be allowed to come into this world. You need to take a closer look at Planned Parenthood, an organization put together by Margaret Sanger. She formed Planned Parenthood to eliminate black Americans. In affect she was a eugenicist something that came to the fore in the early decades of the 20th century. As a result of her and others efforts this nation ended up with laws on the book that allowed for the sterilization of "febble-minded people" of all people nor matter the color but blacks werer the prime target. Planned Parenthood likes to pass themselves off as the saviour of women when in reality they are the largest provider of abortions in the nation--both girls and boys. There is a biography out on Sanger and there is an excellent book War Against the Weak that you might want to read. We had the 'febble-minded laws" in 29 states and the law lasted until 1965 when California finally got rid of theirs. I believe that for every child born there is a reason

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

9:36 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

Chris-- Following your logic, you should look into our country. Founders were slave owners, none were natural born citizens, tried to preserve slavery for years, and even raped women who had their children under enslavement. And the country passes itself as a defender of women's rights. As far as I know Planned Parenthood has never performed even one abortion. They provide information on birth control, perform medical tests, provide risks assessment associated with various options but do not perform any surgical procedures. For every child born there is a reason, family planning or poor birth control. Now for a cheap shot; eugrenicists must have been terribly ineffective or we would not have Republicans. Have a great night!

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

7:56 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

I hate it when people resort to complaining about things that happened 1-200 years ago as proof that this is a terrible country.I am currently reading the book "The Help" and I find myself ashamed of what happened in our not to distant past, but at the same time very proud at how far we have come as a society just in my lifetime. If you are so concerned with women's rights then you better fight to make sure Sharia Law does not take hold her in America. And your cheap shot was indeed very cheap and insulting.

Chris Miller

4:04 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

My Gordon Settersh were much more discrete than this No respect for the public who is goig to get to pay for this mess

Brunell

4:29 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

So I took the time to skim the posts over the last 24 hours. Lots of right and left debate, however, not a lot on how to stimulate and sustain/pay for the plan. Just how much everyone is oppressed and how the big guys take advantage of the little guys, pretty much what the entire occupy wall street movement seems to be about. If the government becomes huge, as it has already, doesn't that make all of us the little guy? I have another simple question, why do they refer to people entering into the US as illegal aliens? I have an idea, how about this.....follow the laws already on the books! Become a "legal" alien or be naturalized, pay taxes, and become a positive for the country. Please post something to help me see the other side. It just doesn't make sense. The math has to work. Economy is based on Business not Government, right? So listen to the real Middle America, the guy who has 20 to 100 employees. Those are the guys supporting this thing, right?

Brunell

5:09 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

But who will pay the taxes? This just is not sustainable, to say to increase the taxes means everything we purchase will increase. Why not stimulate business to make more, hire more, be creative? Your taxes will come by definition. More revenue is more tax correct?

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

7:48 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

I think Jesus was talking about CHARITABLE GIVING not TAXES.

Brunell

5:31 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

I agree, tax reform. When someone doesn't pay in or receives a check for more than they paid in, how do they have some "skin in the game"?Surely the USA is worth something?It is not as black and white as we both would like to think but an increase to someone who makes 200K or more is not the answer.Increasing taxes on business that are already strained will only increase unemployment and generate less taxes.How do we sustain your plan?I think we need to decrease spending, how about that for an idea!When your household has less income, what do you do?You cut back.You learn to live with less.What is wrong with some of the people who blogged above with getting a job for less?"I can collect more on unemployment" You know how many times I personally hear this when offering people jobs...in this economy!Lets extend unemployment benefits, right? WRONG What would you do with more tax revenue?Give it to the unionized municipal workers and teachers?Re-invest in their pension funds?I guarantee that some of your tax dollars have gone to re-invest in your local municipalities pension funds. Who is re-investing in my pension fund? At some point you must face the fact that someone has to make something or provide a service for profit to fund this thing we call government.To kill that kills the entire house of cards.The government can not be expected to put a roof over my head, pay my education, guarantee me a big cushy job, and keep me warm at night because this is not sustainable.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

7:49 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

Brunell, you are so right!

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

9:25 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

Brunell: Most of the people you talk about pay a variety of taxes. Those who don't are primarily social security recipients who mainly rely on this as sole income. Others are unemployed or make less than poverty level. I am sure you wouldn't trade places. Surely America is worth more than pounding on the poor. Best growth in USA was when tax rates were 99% at top. Almost a depression if Obama had not intervened when taxes at lowest rate in 50 years. If people interviewing make more in welfare means that employer is running a sweat shop enriching himself at expense of the less fortunate. We are subsidizing the company in the form of food stamps to his employees. Don't know how the country can afford more small businesses like these sweat shops. Does your employer offer health care or do we need to pay for that too when employee gets sick. Paying less means affording less, decreasing demand, firing staff, and making less money for the taxpayer. How many times have I heard from small business owners that if are are not frequently audited by IRS you are paying too much tax. The government is expected to look to the common good of the people who elected them. Not greedy business owners who bride congress to put a roof over their head, guarantee a cushy profit and keep them in caviar. Maybe your boss but not my acquaintances owning companies. Strong middle clas is what is sustainable.

Comment_arrow

Brunell

9:36 pm on Monday, October 24, 2011

Limeport Resident, where do you get your information? My employer, at a great expense, and that expense is climbing, pays for employee health care. You can't vilify the businesses. What will be left to tax without them. How do you help people that don't want to sacrifice to help themselves? Like I said in the last post, it's not black and white, but how will the businesses survive? We don't run a sweat shop. The fact you would infer that is disturbing. We break no laws. This class warfare is diverting your focus. Nothing is perfect but the great thing about the USA is the opportunity to come from nothing and make something of yourself. Get it..make something of yourself.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:05 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Yes, Limeport, they pay a variety of taxes. But 47% pay no Federal Tax. In fact many that pay no federal tax get a refund! True Redistribution of wealth. Yes they are the poor and no I do not wish to trade places with them.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

11:02 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Brunell
You are correct. If we can get the government to do the same thing the people are doing, cutting back on their budget, Christmas spending to be down suggnificantly this year, then we can move forward. Where do w cut? Stop baseline budgeting at all levels of government. We go to zero based budgeting every year. You are going to have people who not only don't want this but do not understand it and how corrupting it actually is. I guarantee you that the small business man who really doesn't get much of a tax break will close his doors if we end up with at "you pay your fair share". Those who make money and invest, those mean Wall Street guys, make about 300K a year. That soundsl like a lot of money but consider that many reside in NYC and across the river in NJ--neither is a cheap place to live. These folks will also leave and let me assure you that there are nations that will be only to happy to take them as they have in the past. Keep up the good work you are righht on the monehy,

Wayne Schissler

6:02 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Just in case anyone would like to get back on topic, the merit (or not) of the Occupy movement - ie, the issue they bring up and not all this politics... I have created a very short presentation on this for YouTube. You can view it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsn3uzydr8k

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:42 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Wayne
Great video and right on the money. Let me just add that this corruption was intiated under Teddy Roosevelt but went full blown under Wilson, major Progressive, and the War Industry Board created by Wilson to supposedly assist in the war yet some how it became a Board to destroy the competition.

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

10:58 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Wayne-- Good job. It does show the position of the Tea Party pretty well. It does misrepresent the OWS position. OWS does not focus on the rich alone. It focuses on the fact that 99% of the population is losing their ability to participate in their country. They have no grievance with the rich being rich. Nor do they have a problem with Corporations. It is a fact of life that there will be wealth distribution. The green area is not corruption. It is a valuable input to the country's leaders about issues that affect Corporations. The complaint is that there is not (or is becoming exceedingly small) another "green" area denoting the influence that 99% of the people have on the same leaders that express issues that affect citizens. The system does not provide equality. The size of the green area is correlated with the amount of money one has - and it is becoming an exponential correlation. Hence the influence is greatest for those with money. The rest of us do not get much say. You may argue that the ballot box is a great leveler, but I would argue that money determines results by undue influence, gerrymandering, and a situation where small states get more representation than large states, as well as current voter registration policies. What the OWS is resenting is not that the rich have money, but that they are using their money to take away our country. Keep working on the presentation. It was helpful.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:24 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Finally, a relatively calm interchanges...And Wayne, your presentation is genius...Good show, and thanks for the info.

Mary Anne Looby

9:12 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

@Rosemary B, I too am reading "The Help" to try to understand why anyone would find it entertainment worthy. I have actually heard of women holding "help" parties, and assuming the roles of the characters in the book. I will never understand the actions of the upper class, and the idea that the "help" were not people. Your comment about Sharia Law taking hold in the US is ludicrous. Libyian Americans came here to escape that kind of thinking. I hardly think anyone other than some radical men would welcome it. Libyian woman are as educated as the rest of us and would not stand for such treatment.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

10:21 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Mary Anne
You mingt want to google or bing Sharia Law in the United States, our own judges are referring to it, and Honor Killings and Sharia Law in America. There have been reports of enclaves showing up in American cites by Muslims and with them comes the Muslim societal mores. Do not take this lightly.

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

11:19 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Mary Anne: Good point. Libyan women are very educated in Libya. I know that many doctors treating the wounded during this conflict were women. Many of the spokespeople for the rebels that spoke english (rather than having a translator) are women. A person that is connected with the transition is an American/Libyan from this area. He is teaching primarily women and youths too young to be fighting what to expect during and after the transition and what democracy is all about. The expectation is that women and children will be able to influence their men to form the government that they sought for a couple of generations.
Sharia law has evolved as having negative connotations mainly by fear mongering right wing media. The Roman Catholic St Anthony Messenger had a wonderful article on the Muslim faith and Sharia Law. Nothing like we have been led to believe. Are there sections that misinterpret their faith to subjugate women? You bet. Just as there are right wing evangelicals who misinterpret their religion to subjugate their women. Read the Morning Call article re Libya. You will find their value system similar to ours. The hope is that they will form a government that is somewhat secular. Somehow countries that tend to keep God out of their affairs are more moral, and do more for their citizens.

Limeport Resident

10:26 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Brunell-- I do not vilify businesses. They are key to our economy. What I reacted to is your statement that minimum wage jobs are somehow good. Companies are then subsidized by us (food stamps, tax credits) so that people can eek out a living if they get another job. No upward mobility for them but wonderful profit for the owners. Those are sweatshop conditions. They may provide a service or product but they are not what this society needs. To then ask these people to take a pay cut but not ask the owners to pay an extra 1 or 2% in tax on net profits greater than $250000 (about 1.5% of small businesses) suggests a skewed value system that OWS protesters are highlighting.
Chances are that these low paid people and future generations will not better themselves. That has been true for generations. The chances to do better for the poor is a lot less than the chance that your owners sons we not be able to maintain their standing. I would bet that these people that you vilify work as hard as the owners kids if not harder. Companies will survive if there is demand for their product. There will be demand for their product if there is a strong middle class. How will companies survive if there is no middle class?

Comment_arrow

An interested bystander

10:37 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Wonderful profit? I'm not sure what land you're living in LR, but I run my own business and I'm struggling to make a go of it. I literally cannot afford more than minimum wage for some of the positions here. It's not a sweatshop by any means, I do all I can to keep good people. But I can only afford what I can afford.

Your insinuation otherwise is insulting. If you think it's so easy, then I suggest you start your own business and find out for yourself.

Comment_arrow

Brunell

11:10 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Lets recap. If our company has a minimum wage position, which most, if not all, of the employees are above that minimum, but if we hire a minimum wage employee, pay health care, pay MATCHING federal taxes, (you do understand that a company matches those taxes),follow all the labor laws in place, we run a sweat shop? You are not vilifying businesses? I thought it is a persons choice and the choices they have made that allowed them to qualify for better paying jobs, not the government. People always have the choice.

Chris Miller

10:30 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Nancy
A TOTOAL TAX OVERHALL. On its face it looks good. . All we need now is the "fair share" we are all going to pay. It is interesting that those on the Progressive side use the same language but I have not seen a solid number. So Nancy what number/percentage are you going to place on yourself? Are you going to check and see what the rates are now and who is paying what? Are you and the folks at OWS going to picket tax cheat Warren Buffet who has taken the administrtion to court because he is paying to much despite the fact that he owes the government a billion in tax dollars. Oh, I forgot his secretary will pay the bill. .

Comment_arrow

Limeport Resident

1:24 pm on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Now Chris would deny the rich access to the courts-- even OWS doesn't do that. So anti-rich!

Chris Miller

11:29 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Limeport resident
So you got part of the story. How about Jefferson's attempt to end slavery within the framework of the Declaration of Independence? Jefferson and Washington freed their slaves as did others A number of year later the nation was torn asunder by the Civil War. The president was Lincoln and possibly the greatest president we ever had and the good guys won the war. Is it a horrible part of our history? Yes it is but as far as I know it was England and America who worked to right this wrong. Despite the Civil War in our own nation, there is still slavery in Africa today and in other place around the world.I don't see you leading a brigade to stop that. Nor is the UN involved in stopping it. As to the matter of abortion, Planned Parenthood is the biggest provider of abotions in the US. They will do it at their own facility or outsource it to guys like to a doctor for a fee. . Attempt at humor was poor. But I will waget that you really happy that your mom didn't expose the fetal you to an abortionist willing to kill you for a coouple hundred bucks

Chris Miller

11:35 am on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Rosemary
Correct on your sitation of Charitable giving and Taxes. Don't expect a whole from the uninformed

Limeport Resident

1:21 pm on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Chris-- Planned Parenthood does not perform abortions. Do they provide a list of doctors who will perform abortions. Yep. Do NRA provide a list of gun suppliers who ultimately provide guns to killers? Yep. My mom made the decision to have me but it was her decision made with my father when they could see that I will have a good life.
But women should not have the choice according to you and Sharia law which is also according to you.

Limeport Resident

1:37 pm on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

An Interested Bystander -- I do own a company but do not pay minimum wage because business model is different from yours. I have also consulted with venture capital companies. More than half of the companies started fail. They fail for a variety of reasons, the most prevalent reason is a bad business model. Bill Koch (the good brother) once told me he can spot failures within ten minutes. It is determining the return on investment of surviving companies that is challenging. The next reason for companies is when they growth successfully and the ownership cannot adapt to a new model of a mature business. Founding companies is much different than running them. The last is dumb luck -- I am amazed at the number of companies that a small "if only.." would have changed their destiny. Could I start a small retail business? No problem, but I know I would be struggling and trying to keep good people. That is because I have no idea of a proper business model for that area. Just as I don't know why you are struggling. But I wish you well. For the sake of the country we do not need too many struggling companies.

Chris Miller

1:44 pm on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

I'm sorry it is the Planned Parenthood doctors who do that. If you are referring to the Fast and Furious program that would be the Obama adminnistration and Holder as well as the BATF&E boys. NRA would probably have dealers from whom they would purchase guns for events like the Friends of the NRA dinner. So no married woman has had an abortion. I told you that I want to see a national election on this matter. The only reason abortion is in existence today is because of the fact that the Progressives took it through Courts. Had it gone before the people it would have failed. You and i both know that. As to Sharia law, you just keep getting cozy with it. There is a ton of information, all bad, on this matter. Of course you are aware of the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood will be taking over in Libya and Sharia law will be the law of the land just as they are doing in Egypt. So your saying that your creation was not an oops. Happy for you.

Rosemary B

7:08 pm on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/peter-worthington/sharia-law_b_1030508.html?just_reloaded=1

"Britain allows Sharia law in specific cases, but not without controversy. Backed by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Sharia law was introduced in 1996 in five centres for Muslim family disputes, (London, Manchester, Birmingham, Bradford and Nuneaton). Since then, something like 80 Sharia tribunals have spread across the country, dealing in secrecy, in mosques, behind closed doors, with no independent witnesses. The practice is rife with allegations of intimidation and discrimination."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2019547/Anjem-Choudary-Islamic-extremists-set-Sharia-law-zones-UK-cities.html

I apologize for being off topic, but I thought I would share this about what is happening with Sharia Law in England. It is truly causing a big problem there and getting worse in many European countries where the religion of Islam is growing thru immigration, and high birth rates ect. Do your own research and decide for yourself if this is something to worry about here. I think it is definitely something to be aware of. Especially if you are a woman or have daughters.

Scott Bieber

11:18 pm on Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Hey Chris Miller, I've had enough of your ignorant chatter for the last three weeks. You put the question of abortion to a public vote and an overwhelming majority of U.S. citizens would approve the right to an abortion, My father was a hard core-conservative, lifetime NRA member, didn't like JFK, thought commies had infiltrated, etc, etc, But he believed a woman had the right to have an abortion because he knew that no one knew if a human soul existed in the womb and that it was not for government to get involved in a private issue. I also get a kick out of the fact that more men than woman seem to oppose abortion. Where is that coming from ??
I don't think a man has a say in the matter. You ought to just shut up and stop exposing your ignorance on so many subjects. But I respect your right to speak your mind. I think I might go up to NYC OWS and defecate on a car. Have you talked to any regular people lately about OWS ? Most that I talk to, small business types, contractors, average working people, they support OWS. Wake up Chris and get out into the real world. Alot of people don't like Obama but they also don't like Wall Street, bailed-out banks and the great wealth imbalance. Buy the way, I do own stock. I think its great. I have my own little business. I gladly pay taxes because I know they are necessary. I like real capitalism and free markets and representative democracy. Too bad we don't have them.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:49 am on Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Can't resist the urge to add facts to the discussion! Has stats going back to 1995.
Not overwhelming either way and has not been for a very long time, according to gallup.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/147734/americans-split-along-pro-choice-pro-life-lines.aspx

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:51 am on Wednesday, October 26, 2011

You might want to check www.gallup.com/poll/147734/americans-split-along-pro-choice-pro-life-lines. Published May 23, 2011, it shows that Americans are split on the issue but the majority of people believe that "Abortion is Morally Wrong" That is in sync with our Founding Fathers who stated that we needed to be a moral people based on religion and if we lost either our religion or our morals we would disappear as a people and a nation. The move toward getting rid of abortion has been on the rise for a couple of years. I believe thhat will continue. You are certainly welcomed to your opinion but there are numerous questions. If a woman had a right to an abortion how about the unborn child? If a woman is entitled to an abortion why doesn't the man, and integral part of this, have the right to rear the child? How does a woman become empowered by an abortion? Why are more men opposed to abortion? Don't you think that priest, rabbis, ministers would be able to help you with the fact that a child in the womb has a soul. Would you kindly tell me where I have been ignorant on my subject matter. Yes I have spoken to people about OWS. I have a client who works on Wall Street and two very close friends who have reported to me on the situation. I don't go because this is a replay of the 1960s and becasue I do not need to listen to the anti-semites who are being encourage by those from CAIR. Check to updates on people being removed from the parks. Bit of advice, get out of the market.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:01 am on Wednesday, October 26, 2011

A bunch of the protesters are recent grads who are up to their ears in hock because the jobs are not there...This is no fault of their own, as the Herminator claims them to be...The previous Bush administration got us into this financial mess due to its bad policies as tax cuts for the richs, deregulations of Wall Street, unfunded wars...These young folks hit a blank wall...OCCUPY EVERYWHERE indeed!

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:33 am on Wednesday, October 26, 2011

( I know I am going to regret this, but...)
Perhaps they are up to their ears in hoc because they took out too much in student loans and choose colleges and universities that they could not really afford? Perhaps they choose Majors that jobs are scarce in or do not pay well? Did their own decisions have nothing to do with their current circumstances?

FYI, in order to afford a 4 year college charging $20,000 a yr tuition (and believe me, that is cheap! places like NYU are closer to $ 50,000 a yr!) one would have to save about $4000 per yr per child for 18 yrs! Needless to say, my kids will be spending their first 2yrs in Community College. Hopefully work to contribute to finishing their next 2 yrs at a reasonable state school.

Perhaps it is the crazy expensive colleges and universities they should be protesting? In my opinion, this issue is way to complicated to simply blame the Bush policies.

Chris Miller

9:26 am on Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Rosemary
Here is the real question, why is education this costly and it is at all levels of education.Big question. Are we creating intellectual students? Great book on the matter is the The History of Education in the United States by Alfred Jay Nock. Published in 1931. It is the path we are on today.Why are the students at the park when they might want to look at the reason for the cost of college. I would also sugget that there is a great need in this nation for skilled workmen. Kids you might want to consider that.instead of a "liberal arts" education that will get you a degree in some sort of "studies" course

Chris Miller

12:09 pm on Wednesday, October 26, 2011

So what is the problem with the plan, Nancy. One of the major things that it will do is bring in those who do not,as the President notes, "have skin in the game" It will also bring back personal responsibility when it comes to making decisions like new red corvette or health insurance for the family. Given that we are looking to have 90% of GDP wrapped up in paying the debt by I believe 2020, we should be taking a look at what the real economists have to say not the communists, in favor of keeping the poor folks poor, at the National Memo. Which brans of "ists" are they? Of course we could get serious and come up something that will both save the Republic and bring us together by looking at solid programs.

Chris Miller

12:33 pm on Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Nancy
You are familiar with Babylon and the Tower. You do know that a new Babylon is being built in order that we have a central financil system to carry out the globalization. And you can tell me how we will achieve a "universal common good". It will not happen and it won't be because there are conservatives on earth. I would also suggest that you take a look who are the most charitable folks, the Progressives or the mean, nasty Conservatives. Google or Bing it or maybe someone here can assist you.

George

12:05 am on Thursday, October 27, 2011

i can't believe you retards are still at it. All of you.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

6:46 am on Thursday, October 27, 2011

What would Jesus do?..He drove the moneychangers from the steps of the temple once...He would whip the greedy moneychangers in Wall Street one more time, then go tend to the poor Occupiers...Halleluia!

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

11:01 am on Thursday, October 27, 2011

Rosemary B...(I am sorry I had to go the long route of replying to your recent comment about student loans).

This program has been with us for quite sometime, and appeared to work just fine, with loans gettting paid in earnest because jobs were available then...These young ambitious kids never anticipated they'd be hitting a blank wall after graduation..TADA!..Bush and company plunged the country into the abyss...Jobs are not there, loans are not getting paid...So much for the American Dream.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:31 am on Friday, October 28, 2011

Wilfredo
There were tons of people who defaulted on their college loans by declaring bankruptcy. You, if you are working, and I are getting to pay for this. You can probably get your congressman to get you all the charts on this issue. In his newest proposal, your president is porposing a way for those who borrow now can get out of it later. Keep in mind that the Federal Government owns all of the student loans now. Nothing has changed.

Chris Miller

1:27 pm on Thursday, October 27, 2011

Wilfredo
Have you seen or heard how your buddy Obama is going to really hose your pals at OWS? Have you seen the chart indicating the tremendous rise in student debt. If the parents and kids are going to be really smart they will avoid college and find a school or person who will assit them in acquiring a trade. Being a plumber, electrician, mechanic is going to be a great job. On your above note I would suggest that Rosemary kicked your illiterate comments to the side a long time ago.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

6:05 pm on Thursday, October 27, 2011

Thank you, Chris! It is amazing how, no matter how complicated the situation, TADA! It is always Bush's fault!

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:05 pm on Thursday, October 27, 2011

You still wonder who got us into this mess, Rosemary B?..Obama is trying to get us out of it...The Occupiers are making sure the rest of Washington is listening.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

8:06 am on Friday, October 28, 2011

Wilfredo
Your groupies have absolutely no knowledge as to what is happening. They will only realize it when Obama and his soldiers round them up and puts them into camps. I know this because you simply prattle on a symptom of those who do not read. So here is a book for you to consider.Suicide of a Nation by Patrick Buchanan. Now you can read what this man has written but I am sure you won't do that because your bias will get in the way. So you just stick with TIME. At one time it was a decent, informative magazine. Today it is a rag that does the bidding of the communist sitting in the White House. In closing have no doubt that the Tea Party people are far superior to your "useful idiots" in the occupy group.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:18 am on Friday, October 28, 2011

Wilfredoo
I am surre that Rosemary is only to well aware as to who got us into this, I would ask the same of you.

Brunell

7:08 pm on Thursday, October 27, 2011

We shall see who is listening November 2012.......

Wayne Schissler

10:37 pm on Thursday, October 27, 2011

An interesting graphic showing the differences (and common ground) between the Tea Party and OWS. Clicking on the picture will make it larger and more readable.
http://lvtp912.blogspot.com/2011/10/tea-party-vs-ows.html

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:25 am on Friday, October 28, 2011

Wayne Schissler
There you go again-pointing out the truth in a graphic format that anyone can understand.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:32 am on Saturday, October 29, 2011

I think that graphic says it all!

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

6:29 am on Friday, October 28, 2011

"A TIME poll shows more voters support the protesters than the Tea Party"...10/14/2011 issue.
More: Opinion on Tea Party movement-33% Unfavorable vs 27% Favorable
Occupy protests - 54% Favorable vs 23% Unfavorable
73% of people favor raising taxes on the rich (income of $1M or more)

Evening News - 9% favorability of Congress!..DISGUSTING.

Chris Miller

9:20 am on Friday, October 28, 2011

Rosemary
If you take the time to read Buchana's new book, Suicide of a Superpower" you will add to your store of information. It is scary but worth the read

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

6:35 am on Saturday, October 29, 2011

Attorney Generals of New York and Delaware are set to investigate Wall Street criminal workings after taking cues from the Occupiers.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

8:37 am on Saturday, October 29, 2011

All people who break the law should be prosecuted. I just hope they don't start persecuting people just because they work on Wall Street to appease the OWS crowd.

Trouble is brewing in OWS paradise...
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2011/10/report-fights-erupt-between-occupy-wall-street-protesters/1

Chris Miller

11:28 am on Saturday, October 29, 2011

Rosemary
I cannot believe that Blomburg is letting this happen. I'll wager that the store owners are not pleased about this with Thanksgiving and Christmas on the way. As to the persecuting of people they are already doing that thanks to organizations like CAIR

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

1:50 pm on Saturday, October 29, 2011

So disappointed in Bloomburg! Everyone has a right to free speech, but these "encampments" are a hazard to the naive people in them and the neighborhoods around them! I would be calling and complaining everyday if they were on my street. I'm also part of the 99%, I have rights to and I would want them gone!

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

6:04 pm on Saturday, October 29, 2011

The Occupiers are called useless idiots and the 1% acolytes are called pathetic lemmings...This name calling won't lead us nowhere...Let's all come together and look for solutions to this awful mess...The tea party favorite front runner Herman Cain admonished the 99% protesters to behave and get a job...Coming from someone who does not know much geography is all hot air.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

8:38 am on Monday, October 31, 2011

Pat Buchanan predicts the end of Occupyiers soon...What else is new with this controversial man?..He must do his fair share and be useful instead.

Comment_arrow

Chris Miller

9:49 am on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Wilfredo
Pat Buchanan has done more for this nation then you ever will. He is a couple of gazillions smarter then you could ever hope to be. Meanwhile you have a real opportunity to do some good up there or wherever you are by demanding that women who are raped can go and report it. You, howeveer, have probably found your element. You should really pack you bags and go back home to Mexico.

Rosemary B

11:45 am on Tuesday, November 1, 2011

http://pjmedia.com/zombie/2011/10/31/the-99-official-list-of-ows/

Would not want to stand with any of these groups. Show me your friends and I will show you who you are.

Brunell

11:15 am on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

I think what Chris is trying to say is, if you don't believe in our constitution, pack your bags and go somewhere else. If you are more worried about what someone else is making and not about how you could better yourself on your own, pack your bags. If you think the government is going to fix this, and you can sit in the cheap seats and complain, it will only get worse.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

1:47 pm on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

The Occupy Movement basher Pizza Man is being charged with sexual harrassment...Let's see you get out of this one.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

4:25 pm on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Well, Clinton had no trouble getting out of his mess while he was president, but he is a Democrat and they are definitely held to a lower standard.

Chris Miller

2:04 pm on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Wilfredo.
The guy you currently have in the White House is an admitted cocaine and marijuana user as well as a consumer of tobacco, something he vowed to quite. When you do not hold the high moral ground you should stop your preaching. The so called abuse of two women will take care of itself and you can rest assure if Mr. Cain has indeed done a dirty deed he will loose support. Your candidate, on the other hand, will continue with his ways, whatever they are because he is not a moral man nor is he a patriot. If you read his books, and you won't do that, you will find out who this man is. If you can still stand him after the reading, well, you get what you deserve. Keep in mind how mush assistance he gave to his aunt who was here illegally.

Chris Miller

4:46 pm on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Rosemary
Do you remember the good old days when young Douglas Ginsberg was on his way to the US Supreme Court under Reagan. Nina Totenberg, a Progressive reporter who would offer things to Bill Clinton, turned up and published Ginsberg's smoking marijuana. He withdrew his appointment to the Court. Since then the Dems have coughed up Dukais, who would not put the death penalty in place for rapists even if his wife had been the victim. Then they give us Clinton, followed by Gore and Kerry. The Republicans were not much better with Bush 41 and 43. We offered up McCain last time and now we are being told we need to vote for Romnie. Then we have the entire issue of morals and it plays a major role. Within in the Dems. Party there are those who freely admit that they have no morals eg. Anthony Weiner. The Republicans do subscribe to morals but then up and manage to do something morally wrong and they suffer for it correctly I might add.

Rosemary B

4:49 pm on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/real_job_killers_2bVY2PIRGWUrVIqREYgtoL

Another business forced to lay off workers because of OWS. 21 people driven out of work because of the occupiers just in time for Thanksgiving!

Comment_arrow

Jason George

6:11 pm on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

21 people out of 100. This place opened in June. The original cafe is in Boston and is a corporate caterer. Marc Epstein, the owner of both, has the largest catering business in Boston. He's making excuses. 100 employees is not a "cafe" it's a catering business.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

9:59 pm on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

I don't think that will make much of a difference to the 21 people laid off due to business being down 30% because of the trouble brought on by OWS.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

8:00 pm on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

In God We Trust...What was that all about?..These clowns in the House are wasting our precious time and money pretending to make laws and they are screaming "Where are the jobs?"..They must think we are idiots...Pay attention to the Occupiers and change your ways for the good of the country not your party.

Chris Miller

10:00 am on Thursday, November 3, 2011

Wilfredo
Let me see if I have this right. I should be listening to rapists, thieves, all sorts of malingerers, those who are in favor of anarchy, lawless, members of all the "ists" and "isms" and those who have foolishly gotten themselves into debt for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Your silly occupiers are making Congress and all officials look like saints. Keep up the good work.

The editor has closed comments for this article.