patching...
Breaking: Update: Woman Struck by Vehicle and Killed is Identified »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Tell Us: Do you want 24/7 Police Coverage?

Should Macungie Borough Council mandate that a Macungie police officer be on duty at all times?

 

Editor's note: This poll will close at noon on Friday, May 25. Results will be published Friday afternoon.

The amount of police coverage provided by the Macungie Police Department was debated at the council meeting Monday.

Mayor Rick Hoffman has told Police Chief Edward Harry that he is to schedule 25 police shifts per week.

Part-time police officers are to be scheduled only to fill in for full-time officers on vacation, holidays and/or sick leave.

No part-time officers may be called in to fill regular shifts left suddenly unfilled due to illness or other circumstances nor would the mayor approve overtime pay for that purpose, it said.

Some council members thought it would be appropriate to leave some shifts unfilled since nobody really knows when that happens.

What do you think?

  • Does the borough of Macungie need to cover all its police shifts with Macungie police officers?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes, I want a Macungie officer on duty at all times.
        175 (69%)
    • No, it's fine with me to leave some shifts unfilled.
        77 (30%)
    Total votes: 252
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Macungie Borough Council, Macungie Mayor Rick Hoffman, Macungie Police Chief Edward Harry, and Macungie Police Department

Ron Beitler

1:26 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

I honestly don't have enough information. What I do know... Is that I feel completely and totally safe having my business in Macungie right now. Now would that change if we didnt have 24/7? I dont know... Did we ever have crime problems in Macung before 24/7 mandate? Not that I remember in my 33 years in the area. I can guess not much would change if we didnt.

As I've said many times. There are bigger issues in this borough coming from the perspective of a business owner. This police issue really distracts from big picture.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tamarya

3:12 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

I never knew macungie never had 24 hr police protection, but the info is out now and now gives a heads up to someone intending to do harm or vandalize or rob.

Comment_arrow

Nicole

7:08 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I have noticed that the State Police are around quite often making me feel safe enough to have a few gaps in the scheduling of the Macungie Borough Police. I think it is a great idea to help with the budget.

Comment_arrow

Brian

7:11 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I believe the issue is that 75% of the current budget is spent on the police force, so there's frankly nothing left for anything else. Maximizing the existing agreements would free up cash to provide the other necessary services without raising taxes. Seems pretty simple to me.

Comment_arrow

Responsible Citizen

7:56 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Can any of you who continually state the police budget is "75 per cent" of the overall budget please explain the importance of reinstating to full time the positions which were decreased to part time status? I suppose this all comes down to priority and individual priorities will always vary. The value of a community's safety and health is at the top of my list and should NEVER be compromised. Reading some of these comments implying a police dept is extravagant does not resonate with me or those who have experienced the need for police in an emergency! This is similar to those who place a price tag on the value of education or health care for all!!

Comment_arrow

Carl W

8:38 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

First, what is the budget issue? Also, how 'bout asking P.S.P. - Fogelsville if they feel they can adequately protect. (I. E. Can the find addresses, & HAVE MANPOWER THERE IN 3 MINUTES)?

Mrs. B

11:09 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Here is my opinion: Alburtis Police are very busy with their own borough and Macungie often has to call these other boroughs and/or state for backup, that just shows that there are not enough shifts for the Macungie officers, at least in my opinion. And by needing to call in other boroughs or state troopers, there will be a longer wait in the event of an emergency. And what happens if the other boroughs are tied up??? Or there is a train through Macungie and the other area police have to take a longer detour to get through??? There is a better chance of getting speedy help if the officers are closer to where they may need to be. My other point: crime rate is elevating in the US. Macungie may have a smaller crime rate then many other areas around here, but that very well could be because it is a small borough with their own Police Force. So why take the chance of cutting the police department hours and risk the crime rate to rise putting our property, homes and children at risk for crime??? One other point is the police officers themselves. The nation's unemployment rate is extremely high, too many people are already suffering from this, so how about we keep the police officers 24/7 to do our part in helping our nation's employment rate and cut unnecessary things. The police are a big part of Macungie as they are the ones who do their best to protect us and our children victims of crime. Macungie is one of the top safest places to live in Pa, let's keep it that way!

Reply

another voice

7:29 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

"Some council members thought it would be appropriate to leave some shifts unfilled since nobody really knows when that happens". I believe the mayor also made that comment in addition to some council members. Incredibly naive, arrogant or stupid comment. Take your pick and you decide. Let me explain who would know (besides the criminals). The person who calls in a complaint and requests police assistance for any reason and is told no one is on duty so they will have to wait. Whether the reason for their call be medical or criminal. That is who would know. What arrogance to make that comment.

Reply
Comment_arrow

firestorm

7:50 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

This is why we need to clean house!!!!! Stupidity!!!!!!!

Cliff

8:49 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Criminals are around 24/7. Enough said.

Reply

One who cares

10:08 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I prefer having 24/7 coverage and in fact at times, more than one officer on duty could be wise. When the Mayor says people complain that the police officers are not nice to them, my question is...were they being arrested at the time? I prefer the police not be nice to law breakers!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Responsible Citizen

10:21 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

At the meeting Hoffman admitted the complaints were not simply from residents but COUNCIL as well!!!! Interesting!! Just WHERE are all these complaints documented!!?? Coming from council??!! This ongoing preoccupation with the police chief and his department by this mayor and his cronies on council is quite suspicious and getting old and expensive for this borough! Isn't it interesting how the budget was reopened at the urging of borough manager and all those individuals important to her had their full time status reinstated....no questions asked, however, the 6th police position was cut leading on to this recent debacle! How curious Mr. Becker, who attempts to portray himself as so incredibly "fiscally conscious", took no issue then??!! If these elected officials cannot responsibly see their way through all this, then how can we expect they have the ability to responsibly legislate ANYTHING for our borough!!?? Well....election day cannot come soon enough!!

Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

10:22 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

First of all I think the Macungie Police do a fine job. And for people who complain about being pulled over. . . I've never heard of Macungie PD pulling anyone over who did nothing wrong. If your pulled over it's because you broke the law. Period

That being said, people need to know how EXTREMELY expensive police protection is. I've heard upwards (please correct me if I'm wrong) 75% of TOTAL borough budget. I honestly do not think an open shift on a rolling basis (i.e. you never know when the open shift(s) are) would change anything.

You need to think of it this way. What is it that stops people from committing a crime? Is the low crime rate because the cop is out there physically stopping crime? No. It's because of perception. It's all about deterrence. Would LIMITED open shifts change the deterrent? I would argue no.

If this proposal would go through I would argue you would see no change. If the open shift is on a rolling basis nothing changes. Criminals still know there is a great chance a cop is on duty, the deterrent is still equally effective.

And for those who say 'who would answer a call', well it's the same person who does anytime no one is in the Police station. I think it's some kind of county dispatch which then would call the nearest unit regardless of affiliation. Say the Macungie PD is on another call. Your call would then go to Alburtis, or State or Emmaus. Nothing really changes. You still have coverage your still protected.

Comment_arrow

another voice

11:13 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Mr. Beitler. With all due respect your last paragraph suggests that you really don't understand. There is a difference between being on another call and not being on duty at all. If the Macungie officer is on a call, it does not automatically go to another department. You really need to listen to the explanation that was provided by the Chief on how that works. If no officer is on duty you will wait for the state police. Period. Keep in mind that they will only respond to emergencies and that is if they are available. It sometimes takes them hours to respond in municipalities where they are the sole police protection. They will not enforce local ordinances also. If you need an officer immediately, would you want to wait hours??? If your business was being broken into and a neighbor called the police, Macungie PD would be there immediately. If they are not on duty, who knows when an officer might get there and how much damage might be done in the interim.

You sound like a sensible person. But, in this case it does not appear you are thinking of all of the possible repercussions of not having an officer on duty or you don't fully understand. I would suggest talking to the chief or an officer directly and have them explain it. I am sure they would be happy to speak with you. My experience is that they will go out of their way to assist and respond to questions.

Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

11:20 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I do understand it would be much like the situation in LMT (population over 30,000 vs. Borough hair over 3K) I've said many times I think state police protection is adequate in LMT. (Just my opinion) I've never heard 1st hand an example of people waiting hours for state police for serious issues. In fact I've heard the state police responding quickly in cases of silly issues like noise disturbance (FYI LMT doesnt even have a noise ordinance)

If you call Macungie PD off hours... your call doesnt go directly to the cop car. I am sure of that.... It does to a dispatcher. That was my point.

Your right in the case of ordinances. But again... It goes back to LIMITED open shifts on a rolling basis. I just do not think this would have a major effect on the borough. I just don't.

But I respect your opinion.

Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

11:21 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Now... the whole question of whether it's fair for LMT to rely on state police.. thats a whole other issue. One that won't be coming to a head anytime soon though... since the legistlation forcing townships to pay won't come up for years again. So for now, it's just a it is what it is thing.

(Personally I would love to see LMT, Alburtis and Macungie pool resources to form a regional dept.)

Comment_arrow

another voice

11:54 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I respect your opinion also. I may not agree with everyone's opinion but I respect them nonetheless provided they are done curteously, as yours always are. One thing though. No call to the police in any department goes directly to the police car. They all go to a dispatcher first. Even PSP. I have heard many, many complaints from residents of LMT and other areas about lack of response from PSP. Not the fault of the department. They too are severely limited by manpower restrictions as well as department policy as to what they can respond to.

Comment_arrow

Lower Mac Resident

1:04 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012

I know, I'm not in the "bourough" of macungie, but I'm in lower macungie, and I've never waited more than 5 minutes for state police the three times I've called, I highly doubt it would take very long in an emergency to get a state trooper to your residence or business if the "macungie" police were busy

Ron Beitler

10:24 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Speaking of perception and it's importance. Because there is a perception the mayor has a vendetta... people knee jerk to these kind of policy discussions. I have clue whether the guy does or doesnt. I do know, the perception that he does really harms the borough. He can't (right or wrong) get anything done without people questioning his motives. Therefore he's become really ineffective. Esp in the case of police matters.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Responsible Citizen

10:29 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

With all due respect Mr. Beitler, the "perception" of the mayor that you refer to is much more than "perception"....his obstructionist behavior has already occurred and is ongoing by numerous incidents and examples. This is NOT PERCEPTION...it is FACT!!!

Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

10:32 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Regardless.. the guy has become a polarizing figure. In a small borough this creates issues. Because of this, I hope someone runs against him.

And..... I actually do think he was right to pursue mayor control of the PD. We have civilian oversight of our armed service and police forces in America. This is CRITICAL for fair and impartial law enforcement. It's one of those little things that makes America so special. Again, as I said above. It's the perception thing that muddies the whole debate and makes him ineffective as a mayor.

Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

10:36 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Reponsible C - I'm just saying. I have no way to know. And I've been to council meetings. But really it's moot what I think or don't think, because as I said.... the perception is out there. And it's damaging. The mayor should have had a little more tact.

Comment_arrow

Responsible Citizen

10:50 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Again Mr. Beitler...."Perception" is NOT what this mayor is all about! He is straight ahead with his crazy tactics and his disdain for the police department is NOT "perception! However, you as well as those of us who actually reside in Macungie are entitled to our opinions on this important matter.

Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

10:54 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Responsible Citizen - We're agreeing! I'm just saying it doesn't matter at this point whats true or not cause the perception is there. And thats HIS fault either way. Thats all. He's a big distraction now. Nothing positive is going to get done while he's mayor. We need good people to run. There are 2 good council members on the board right now, they need support.

Comment_arrow

Just Say It

9:41 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

Mr. Beitler, you said we only have 2 good council members on the board right now that need our support. Who might they be?

John Rogers

10:30 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

How is this for a sad tactic? A young lady with a connection to the mayor (I won't say how unless absolutely necessary) has posted on her facebook page for all of her friends to go to this poll and vote "no" for 24/7 police coverage. If it wasn't so sad it would be laughable. And by the way, I printed the page in the event it "disappears".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

11:01 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Ok? Isn't that democracy? What's wrong with that. I'm not saying I agree. I'm saying whats wrong with her doing that? She has an opinion and is entitled to it? Her friends can now make up their own minds. I'm assuming they aren't lemmings.

Comment_arrow

another voice

11:21 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Macungie taxpayers pay the bill for police protection. It is their opinion that matters. The poll should not be skewed by personal agendas causing people from who knows where to weigh in based on being friends with this youg lady. That would be akin to having you out of town friends come to the next election and vote for mayor and council candidates in Macungie. The point is, let's have honest results.

Comment_arrow

Ron Beitler

11:54 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I agree.. but these polls are unscientific across the board. People can influence both ways if they are motivated to. Would love to see this mandate (24/7 protection) go to referendum. Seems like perfect issue to address with one. We don't have enough ballot referendums in PA.

Comment_arrow

Carl W

8:47 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Expose her. That's like lying to Borough & residents - presenting a false picture, to parties sincerely working on problem (or threaten to if she doesn't come forward, stop, and tell about how many false votes she incited).

What's wrong w/ P.T. officers filling in for ill, no-shows, and vacations? They'll cost more, however, also know the Borough better when they are regularly called up. Macungie is not Phila. 1 officer off could be 50% of the force!

Comment_arrow

LT

11:14 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

John Rogers,
What does it even matter that she is connected to the mayor? That has nothing to do with anything about this topic. She voiced her opinion. Told everyone how she voted. No big deal. She has the right to do so. How sad is it that you have to expose her in any way. And so what if it disappears? It's her choice to show and hide what she wants.

Comment_arrow

John Rogers

12:43 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012

LT- Read my post again. I didn't say she merely voiced her opinion. I said that she was soliciting all of her firends on Facebook, who I am sure do not live in the boro, to go on the site and vote against 24/7 coverage. This is a boro problem. Do I really need to explain why I feel it is sad to utilize the tactic of getting non-residents to skew the poll????

Comment_arrow

Julia Hinster

5:12 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012

She is allowed to do that ...It is a free country after all and your inference about her
so called connection to the mayor is insulting.

Comment_arrow

John Rogers

2:21 am on Saturday, May 26, 2012

By all means tell us why that would insult you. Should be interesting.

Comment_arrow

John Rogers

2:23 am on Saturday, May 26, 2012

And I never said she wasn't allowed. Simply opinied that it was sad. I am allowed to do that. :-)

Ron Beitler

11:12 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Bottom line: You can have and it's appropriate for an open and honest discussion on what the borough wants. The issue is the way the council has fumbled this and the perception of the mayor (whether real or not it doesnt matter and I know (Responsible citizen) people feel strongly one way or the other....) The point is it has overshadowed the real issues.

It's clear people need to step up and run. Maybe the borough elects these people again? But if they keep their office due to no one stepping up and running against them or due to low voter turnout.... THAT would be the real shame. Someone with a criminal history was elected at 19 years old in Alburtis recently...with a grand total 115 votes. I really hope for Alburtis sake the kid has turned things around and takes his position seriously... but the point is... that it's incredibly sad that this is the state of our democracy.

Reply

Kate

4:13 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Last month, Mayor Hoffman wanted us to pay for GPS systems in all the police cars, so he can monitor them from home. But money is the reason to not have staffing? Yup. Right.

Reply

Kate

4:21 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

and YES. I want 24 hour police coverage. I do not want to pay for Rickie Hoffman's legal fees. One more year to go. There should be a political rally in the park next year where we can hear everyone who is running speak on their beliefs and have a debate. This is a small enough community that we can do that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

firestorm

7:47 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

I think this is a great idea!!! I know what mayor sends letters out to the residents for money to pay legal fees. I lmao all the way to the garbage can!!! We need to clean house around here.

ron

5:34 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

One thing not mentioned here is that the police in macungie, just like the police in emmaus and alburtis are usually the first to arrive during a medical emergency or accident. They are almost always the first to evaluate the situation to start first aid, open airways, start c.p.r, and so forth. When i needed an ambulance an officer was at my house about five minutes before the ambulance. I hear this is very commen, people who rely on state police dont get this important possible life saving service that people living in boroughs with police do. Also if someone is trying to break into your house the difference between 3 minutes average response from local police and 7 to 10 minutes average response from state police probally feels like a lifetime.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carl W

8:54 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Troopers once evaluated, "In an emergency, we can be anywhere in our district in 20 minutes!" - P. S. P. - Fogelsville, few years ago.

I'm in far corner of Allentown - Apt. Security, I'm comforted that A. P. D. averages 2-3 minutes.

firestorm

7:44 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

Hoffman, can not wait to vote him out!!!!!!!!!!! He is just a huge pain in the ass, and the councel is no better!!!!!!! Lived in this town for thirty some years and never had all this bullshit. Macungie cops are and have always been there if I needed them. I think we need 24 hour coverage more then ever now. This town is not the same and 24 hour coverage is just logic!!! It is time Macungie cleans house, if I could do it on my own I would!!!!

Reply

Ron Beitler

11:13 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

FYI - Here are the council members up in 2013
Mayor Hoffman - Term up 12/31/13

Jean Nagle - President - 12/31/13
From recent patch article - Borough Manager Chris Boehm made the point that the public might not be able to express opinions if too many limitations are imposed.
“I don’t care,” Nagle said at the April meeting.
And later reiterated... “But I still don’t care to hear from people during the meat of an issue,” she said at the May 7 meeting."

David Boyko - 12/31/12

Linn Walker - 12/31/13

I don't follow Macungie council as closely as I do LMT BOC... But I'd say Hoffman and Nagle need to be challenged. Hoffman has become a distraction and Nagle judging by recent comments is clearly confused on how local gov't (encouraging not discouraging citizen participation) is supposed to work. The local level depends on an honest discussion and citizen participation. Leaders are elected to facilitate discussion. Not decree or make unilateral decisions as on the federal level or statewide level where you elect people to represent you. Local level is by design supposed to have more community participation.

Now of course this is a two way street. And Macungie is notorious for a largely disengaged community.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Just Say It

11:46 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

I think the term of the following individuals expire next year which means we need to solicit for new people to run and get there names on the ballot for the primary next April.
Council members
Jean Nagle - 12/31/13
Joe Sikorski - 12/31/13
Linn Walker - 12/31/13
Dave Boyko - 12/31/13
Mayor
Rick Hoffman - 12/31/13

Boyko and Sikorski might be the only candidates I would consider relecting provided they don't call it quits because they had enough.

ron

5:23 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012

Boyko and Sikorski deserve to be re-elected. Boyko tried to keep our taxes from being raised and they both fought for the peoples right to speak and be heard during meetings. They both also used commen sense when voting on the GPS issue. As far as Nagle is concerned her comments from the last few meetings, which can be read above in Ron Beitlers post, says it all. She should not be re-elected. And walker is a one issue council person his only concern is attacking the police. I dont think i ever heard or read a quote from him on any other issue. he should not be re-elected.

Reply

ron

5:35 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012

The past council was busy working on things like sidewalks, the downtown master plan and bringing new business to the borough but ever since our mayor was elected and started wasting money trying to fix something that wasnt broke everything came to a standstill. we must change that in 2013. But we need people to run both Hoffman and Walker won because there where no other names on the ballot.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Responsible Citizen

5:50 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012

Hoffman, Nagle, Walker and Hutchison are definitely single issue individuals. Nagle has been a power seeker for the many years she has served on council....she is rude, inconsiderate and tremendously intolerant of ANY opinion that does not match hers! I have witnessed her arrogance and disrespect of residents and fellow councilman at numerous meetings!! Her motives are questionable at best. She needs to be eliminated from council. Theroblem in Macunge is the complacency and apathy of our residents....therein lies the problem and one could argue we get the government we deserve as a result. This is exactly why our current council was elected by a paultry minority!

Leave a comment