patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

My Point of View About the Election

Over the past few weeks I have heard numerous negative remarks about myself and the board of commissioners in reference to several township concerns, and I would like to set the record straight. 

I could choose to slander my opponent, as Mr. Sharpe has done to me, but I choose to take the high road and discuss the facts about these issues and the positive contributions the commissioners have made to the township.  I believe that the residents of Lower Macungie Township deserve to hear the facts about our township, instead of the exaggerated disparaging opinions posted by an uninformed candidate.

In many regards the residents of Lower Macungie Township are very fortunate.  We live in one of the few municipalities in the state which has no municipal real estate tax and our community is blessed with an exceptionally large reserve fund. Mr. Sharpe claims the commissioners are responsible for deficit spending over the past several years which is hurtling the township to certain ruin. The truth, according to township manager Bruce Fosselman, is that the Township will end this year with a surplus in the budget, which could be used to pay down the debt in next year’s budget. It is anticipated that the general fund for the township will be $7.7 million dollars at the end of 2011, in comparison to the general fund balance of $7.1 million at the beginning of 2008, when I first took office. This snapshot shows growth by $600,000 during a period of tough economic times, a true sign of fiscal responsibility on the part of our board of commissioners.

The Jaindl development plan is the current hot topic for the township, and one that I would like to address. Those of us involved in the litigation process, myself included, have been advised by the township solicitor not to discuss the matter openly. Since it is currently in litigation, my hands are tied which prevents me from discussing any details. As an attorney, Mr. Sharpe is aware that following the advice of council regarding legal matters is always the best course of action, yet he continues to render opinions and challenges for reply to which he knows that I can not respond. He is clearly taking advantage of the situation. I can say that I am definitely in favor of farmland preservation where ever possible, but such preservation should always begin with the cooperation of the farmer. The fact remains that Mr. Jaindl owns the farmland and has the right to develop it.

Another concern expressed by many residents of the township is the formation of a local police department. Since this topic is frequently brought to the attention of the commissioners, we asked the Public Safety Commission to study the issue and make their recommendations. At this time nothing is proposed regarding the formation of a police department. The decision not to develop a police department at this time is driven primarily by the current weak economy and the potential reallocation of funding for the PA State Police service now being discussed in Harrisburg. House Bill 2586, which is currently pending in state legislation, if passed, would allow the state to charge municipalities without local police departments, such as LMT, for the state police coverage. I am advised that this bill is in committee and probably will not surface for 5 years. Until action is taken by the state government to charge the township for police service it is doubtful there will be any action taken to form a local police department. Studies, however, may and probably will be done by the board in the future to determine what is the best course of action should the state approve the bill.  

In response to resident requests, the commissioners have made it a priority during the past two years to preserve green space and develop greenway and trail system plans for enhancement of our township quality of life. Grants have been acquired to significantly offset the cost of these projects. The township has also solicited for and received grants to reconfigure existing township owned detention basins to align them with current DEP regulations. Such improvements are designed to retain stormwater in the basins and help reduce localized flooding.

Overall, I think the township has done well during the past four years since we became a first class township. Despite the tough economic times we have managed to live within our means and have not instituted a municipal real estate tax or reduction of services. The commissioners welcome all residents to attend our public meetings to let us know your concerns. We encourage involvement in the community and welcome everyone who wants to make a difference to apply for positions on our committees and comment on our plans. While I understand that not everyone is happy with all decisions that we make, which is true in all government situations, be assured that I have always found the commissioners have acted with the goal of keeping Lower Macungie Township one of the best places to live in the Pennsylvania.

Lower Mac Resident

8:43 am on Monday, November 7, 2011

Basically, you told us things we already know and didn't say a word about your back door events that led to you making decisions for our township that you should not have done.....again, no answers.....Can't wait for tomorrows election

Reply

optimist

8:59 am on Monday, November 7, 2011

Mr. Brown, Jaindl bought that land knowing it was zoned agricultural. You and your fellow commissioners CHOSE to rezone the land. The quarry threat was garbage. The State would have been unlikely to approve such a large quarry. If anything, a vastly scaled down quarry may hae been approved which is much better than what Jaindl will do with this land. In addition, The lehigh County court system has ordered you and the others to go back and restart this process with more public imput. You and your fellow commissioners CHOSE TO APPEAL THIS DECISION USING OUR TAX MONEY!!! Why? Afraid of public imput? Furthermore, why do you chose to ignore the tax increases when new schools have to be built due to this unwise zoning change along with all of the other infrastructure spending that will surely raise taxes down the road?

Reply

Ron Beitler

10:23 am on Monday, November 7, 2011

Making the Jaindl issue about landowner rights is fundamentally misleading. Mr. Jaindl bought the majority of the land in question knowing of Agricultural protection ordinance in place that has stood for 23 years. This only requires looking at public records to find out this public information. Surely a seated township commissioner can find these documents. This is NOT a landowner rights issue. LMT residents are smart enough to tell the difference between a landowner rights issue (rights I absoultely support) and a bungled zoning amendment.

Reply

Friends for Protection LMT

10:30 am on Monday, November 7, 2011

Throwing around the word slander is an interesting little political trick. Mr. Sharpe has been quite clear to cite newspaper articles, meeting minutes ect. when outlining Mr. Brown's track record. The interesting thing about being an incumbent is you can't escape your record. Mr. Brown supported the original clandestine negotiations with Mr. Jaindl and when given a golden opportunity to right a wrong and restart the process from scratch in the sunshine.... AGAIN voted to support a land developer over the community at large.

The BOC has attempted to politicize this issue in the past week by attacking citizens, and those who volunteer on the zoning board. But from our perspective it's very simple, do not let politics cloud the essential issues... Drive the roads, do you think traffic is an issue? Drive over the river even after a typical rain event and see with your eyes the Little Lehigh bulging out it's banks. Think about your pocketbook and the paying the millage tax that will be inevitable if this Jaindl debacle is allowed to proceed.

Reply

optimist

10:42 am on Monday, November 7, 2011

Speaking directly to the voters: Mr. Brown is counting on a lot of straight ticket voting by Republicans tomorrow which will guarantee his reelection. Republicans that know about the Jaindl land deal will tell you that this is not about party. This is not about R and D. It's about smart development, transparency and governing on behalf of the citizens of Lower Macungie Twsp.
Vote Lancsek (R) and Sharpe (D) tomorrow

Reply

LMTCFC1

11:42 am on Monday, November 7, 2011

When considering Doug Brown - focus on the matter of ethics and what he and his Board cohorts (Brown, Eichenberg & Conrad) did in appointing a new Solicitor after accepting a second bid (only company allowed to do so) that was motivated by private discussions between Eichenberg and Tallman, Hudders & Sorrentino - AND supported by Brown. See Morning Call article at: http://articles.mcall.com/2010-11-20/news/mc-lower-macungie-solicitor-20101120_1_hour-for-paralegal-work-president-roger-reis-bethlehem-firm

Here is a brief portion of the article: Commissioners Reis made clear his displeasure that Tallman, Hudders & Sorrentino changed its proposed rates after its initial proposal, one of 13 received by the township. He suggested the hourly rate was changed after a representative of the firm spoke to one of the commissioners. The initial rate proposed was $195 per hour. "After they applied, they had a conversation and changed the rate to make it lower," Reis said. "I don't really think that's right. I think when you make a bid and then find out that the bid is high, you don't get a chance to go back and re-bid." Commissioner Ron Eichenberg said he had been approached by one of the firm's attorneys at a social function and was asked "how things went" with the proposal.

"I said, 'Not so good,'" Eichenberg said. "He said, 'Was it the fee?' I said, 'Yes.'"

Mr. Brown - you voted with Eichenberg and Conrad. Is this what you call Ethical Behavior? I don't think so!!

Reply

Scott Bieber

11:43 am on Monday, November 7, 2011

Mr. Brown, No one disputes that Mr. Jaindl has the right to develop his land, but it is a right contrained by zoning. The previous zoning allowed houses and a quarry. The commissioners secretly agreed to change the zoning to allow warehouses, commercial sprawl and 700-900 high density housing units, all at the request of Mr. Jaindl. Residents object to this zoning change because it will have major negative impacts on the quality of township life and it was done with no public involvement. Why can't you and your fellow commissioners admit your mistake and renegotiate the rezoning with public involvement ?? Either you are too arrogant, too stupid or too corrupt.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Barb

12:24 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

I have to agree with your comment 100%.

Rob Hamill

12:13 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

Lower Macungie has a long history now of ignoring downstream property rights. The Little Lehigh Creek is the township jewel, and it is being attacked by LCA and LMT commissioners by illegally high creekside pumping and tremendous overdevelopment of the land. LCA aggressiveness in pushing for forced public water systems for all has played right into a LMT brain dead approach to intelligent zoning. I'll vote for the new guys, for sure. Jim Lansek would be a formidable ally in the protection of precious natural resources due to his incredible township knowledge.

Reply

Friends for Protection LMT

12:49 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

Browns rosy campaign style budget comments are very different then what realist Commissioner Conrad posted on his public FB page a few weeks ago about drastic cuts and the lack of tax....

"Commissioner Ryan Conrad
Very intense budget workshop meeting tonight. We face some serious financial hurdles as we continue to operate without a property tax. We're on the third draft of the budget and still at a $496M deficit despite drastic cuts already made"

Reply

Lower Mac Resident

1:12 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

sounds to me like both Brown and Conrad serve on different boards......lol

Reply

JT

4:16 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

Unbelievable how much misinformation Ron Beitler, Scott Beiber, Bob Sharpe, Larry Schneider and gang are putting out there. Brown got elected last time despite their negative campaign tactics to get him out of office. Now they're going all in with a smear campaign. Schnieder's interest is clearly financial - he wants to make more money off the township (that's right, he has gotten paid to do their website and get's paid to sit on the zoning hearing board; oh yeah, he also got contracts with David Jaindls' attorney Joe Zator and the township engineer Bill Erdman). It's obvious Beitler has political aspirations and is taking advice from the Slattery Chicago-style playbook. He's got a lot to learn. As for Beiber, nobody can serious respect this guy. To top it all off, Bob Rust (zoning hearing board member suing the twp) is making robocalls to get Brown out of office. doesn't sound like he's too objective to me. PS,how come the friends group doesn't publish their membership and campaign finance reports? They say they're funding the appeal but won't let anyone know who's behind it. Same thing with theh citizens for change group - where's they're campaign reports online? Sounds like a lack of transparency to me and they're making decisions behind closed doors. The citizens for change group lost their credibility and continues to. Just look at the deals their board members have benefited from over the years. The friends group is on their way to losing credibility too.

Reply
Comment_arrow

truth seeker

9:28 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

JT you are obviously either a Jaindl man or maybe even one of the commissioners. One thing is for sure: You have no concern about the well being of this township. Trying to make the friends group out as this mad money making super political organization is rather comical. Newsflash: It's a volunteer organization that is concerned about OVER DEVELOPMENT!!!! I'm sorry you can't see the difference and I'm sorry you aren't aware of the under 250 dollar campaign contribution LAW. Good for them for endorsing some candidates who have spoken out about the absurd zoning change.

Comment_arrow

Missy Moyer-Schneck

8:49 am on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

The group against the Jaindl fiasco is a group of citizens, you know, folks who live in the township and care about it's future, I'm one of them, I've donated some money, what i can, that's the difference between us and a political group, we are average every day citizens that are tired of the behind closed door dealings that do not favor the citizens of our township.

Friends for Protection LMT

6:23 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

Friends is not a political group. Our primary purpose is supporting smart growth awareness. Right now the marquee smart growth issue is the jaindl land. Politics the past few weeks has been in focus because an election is happening tomorrow. There are no campaign finance reports because less then 250 dollars (from donations secured specificallly for the purpose of flyers) was spent on "the election" for general printing of an information piece. Both Jim lanscek and Bob sharpe have accepted exactly 0 dollars in contributions from anyone. They have both 100% self funded campaigns. And as far as fundraising for the appeal well that is not a political campaign.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JT

7:50 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

Nice try saying you're not a political group. stop trying to back track now. Your group is political. It's not an on off switch where you can all of a sudden get into politics "because an election is happengn tomorrow." and now that you've admitted on this blog that you guys spent money on a campaign, you better make sure you have the reports to show it. You've gotten away with a lot of bad mouthing, attitude, and flat out lies to make your polical points. You will be called out on it. Why don't you start making a transparent effort by letting everyone know who's hiding behind the "Friends" group. Come clean if you're all such do-gooders.

I see you conveniently didn't address the financial interests of Larry Schneider and the other motives of the gang attacking Brown. I guess you're okay with Rust launching political attacks on Brown even though he's supposed to be objective. If you really care about the community, then call them out on their shady back door non-transparent actions.

You've said more than once that people of LMT are smarter than we think. You're right, and there smart enough to recognize a shady back-room political group when they see one. Theres plenty of us in the township that think like me and are fed up with citizens for change and your shady group trying to speak for everyone in the township.

LoMac Res

7:04 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

A few things:
The reserve fund Brown touts as a highlight was inherited by the current commissioners. In fact, it was and is larger than recommended best practices for township government. Not saying the previous board did a good job, because they didn't. The reserve was just the result of fees from the biggest residential building boom in the state.
RE 4 million square feet of warehouses, high-density residential, and strip mall commercial on the Jaindl land. Maybe a compromise was in order with the threat of a quarry. But giant warehouses? Are you kidding me? They are the bane of the county, and the commissioners somehow found a way to allow them to be plopped into the heart of our beautiful township. For that reason alone, it's Lancsek (R) and Sharpe (D) tomorrow.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JT

7:57 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

You're right Brown inherited the reserve fund. Just like the newer commissioners inherited a boondogle called the leister farm, and inherited this jaindl quarry problem because of past commissioners vote to change zoning on the property (which at least two past commissioners have admitted they regret voting for). I do agree with you the previous board didn't do a good job - well said.

Comment_arrow

Missy Moyer-Schneck

8:50 am on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

JT, the previous board didn't do a good job and the current board isn't doing any better

Scott Bieber

12:38 am on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Hey JT, you know who we are, We have names like Ron, Larry, Scott and Bob and you can see other names of our supporters on our facebook page and when we address the township commissioners . But who are you ?? Talking tough and calling people liars is easy when you hide in the bushes. If you don't have the guts to put your name behind your mouth, keep it shut. Otherwise, I would respect your right to speak against us.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Missy Moyer-Schneck

8:51 am on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

I agree, it's most like Mr. Brown.....sad

Comment_arrow

Robert Sentner

6:20 pm on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Scott it takes someone that can speak the truth, to sign there real name and not hide behind, pseudonym's and abreviations. Hell you even have a picture....LOL
Can't wait to see how the election works out.

Ron Beitler

7:06 am on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Friends supporters are posts with real names. Actual faces putting it out there in the blogosphere talking about issues, not just vague personal accusations. I'm involved with this group and issue because I grew up on Willow Ln and have seen my township fundamentally change over the last few decades. I was happy when the wal-mart came/progress came ect. but have since seen the "corner being turned". We're on the verge of a fundamental change in tone where traffic concerns/environmental =and QOL issues are no longer on the peripheral but a negative fundamental fact of life. Other communities have long learned lessons this BOC refuses to acknowledge. There are smart growth solutions out there.

This is why I'm about to stand in the cold for 8 hours, took a day off work from my business and care enough to put my name out there to get attacked by faceless "handles" on the internet".

Supporters speak out with names and addresses at public meetings where they are literally cross examined. (my count over 30 individuals over the past few months speaking publicly at meetings, nearly 1000 on the petition and hundreds on facebook) The Facebook page is public. An email to get in touch with is public. The steering committee I'm sure would have no problem giving a "roster" if approached with an actual name of a person instead of an internet "handle" by a troll "Definition - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)"; on a blog comment thread.

Reply

JT

11:09 am on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Typical Scott Beiber nasty response about keeping my mouth shut.

Let's stick to the issues I brought up: does your group care about Larry Schneider's financial interest in the elections and decisions in the township (his relationship with Jaindl's attorney, township engineer, etc)? Is it okay that Bob Rust is doing nasty robocalls? Why isn't the citizens for change group or the friends group posting their campaign money info online? You cleverly spent under $250 - is that because you want to hide what you're doing?

Reply

optimist

11:27 am on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

JT you have NOTHING! Please defend Mr. Brown if you dare. I want to hear this. Bob Rust has something you may not be aware of: FREEDOM OF SPEECH!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Missy Moyer-Schneck

1:36 pm on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

All the candidates do! Does JT seriously thing the only person leaving nasty robo calls is Bob Rust? You need a life JT

Leave a comment