.

Macungie Borough Passes 2013 Preliminary Budget in Split Vote

Contentious discussion regarding adding a police officer -- even though it would mean no tax increase -- precedes the vote.

Any budget discussion in which the term "Pandora's Box" is mentioned is not going to be smooth.

But, in this classic display of the good, the bad and the ugly, the term was absolutely used -- and meant -- in the course of the rollout of Macungie's preliminary budget at its Dec. 3 meeting. 

Council Member Chris Becker who, of all seven members of council, spent the most time during 2012 counting the borough's beans, was the one to portend rough times. But not without heated discussion.

In the end, the preliminary budget was passed and will be advertised and on display for 10 days.

The good news is there will essentially be no increase in real estate taxes. Due to Lehigh County's tax restructuring which says taxes will be based on 100 percent of appraised value -- rather than 50 percent of the appraised value as has been the system up to now -- the millage rate for the borough of Macungie will be 2.5 mils as of Jan. 1. Under the 50-percent appraisal system, millage in 2012 was 8.45 mils.

According to council members Joseph Sikorski and Becker, that calculates to be just about exactly the same. It will mean an increase of about $2 per household. They called it a draw.

The "bad" is that there will, however, be an increase in sewer charges. Per quarter the 2013 fixed rate will be $43.56 with a $3.54 flow rate per 1,000 gallons. In 2012 the fixed rate per quarter was $36.16 and the flow rate was $2.99 per 1,000 gallons.

Then came the ugly.

The Macungie Police Department gave council a heads-up that one or more officers will require surgery in 2013. It means that there will be more than 30 weeks in 2013 that an additional officer will be needed to cover the sick time being taken by the full time officer or officers to provide the borough with the protection it's getting now.

The proposed 2013 budget allows for the hiring of a 32-hour per week officer with no tax increase, but Mayor Rick Hoffman has said he will veto the tax ordinance that would support such a budget.

Essentially, council is within its rights to hire a 32-hour per week officer -- which would mean guaranteeing the new officer four shifts per week -- but the mayor will not allow those shifts to be put on the schedule.

The mayor did not attend the council meeting. Members of council who had spoken with him repeated his mandate that there will be only 25 police shifts scheduled each week.

After contentious discussion, council passed the preliminary budget in a 5-2 split vote: Council President Jean Nagle and Councilman Linn Walker voted against it. Council members Debra Cope, Sikorski, Becker and Gregory Hutchison voted for it.

It will be on display at the borough office and on its website after 10 a.m. today.

John Rogers December 04, 2012 at 12:53 PM
LOL...Amazing. Here's a news flash. NO borough mayor has the authority to deny scheduling an employee legally elected by council. Council hires and fires as well as determines the size of the police department, public works, etc. "Bully" Rick has NO legal authority to keep any employee off of the schedule and my guess is that he knows that. My take is that it is his way to attempt to sway the opinion of any council person who is incapable of independent thinking or prone to acquiesce to strong arm tactics. That's why he wasn't at the meeting. So he can later claim that he never made that statement. My congratulations to those on council who did not fall for that feeble attempt to manipulate the police department. As to those who fell prey to that argument....... well, nevermind.
Ron Beitler December 04, 2012 at 05:53 PM
Congrats to the board. Great effort to present a 0% tax increase budget. Unfortunately items like this get ignored far to often in the headlines with the ongoing Mayor vs. Council saga.... There is no bigger issue in today's economy then keeping the tax rate relatively stable and sustainable. This is no small task for a small borough, given the fact the borough has an expensive standalone police department with a 24/7 mandate... (I'm not saying thats good or bad right or wrong I'm stating the fact is it's a major expense.) This is a pretty great budget. Great job by staff and council members.
Honesty December 04, 2012 at 11:12 PM
Mr. Beitler, I usually like your comments but this time, your congratulatory message to the staff and council could have been better had you left out your little "blurb" about the police department. I realize you're just stating a fact but was it really necessary this time. In my opinion it takes away from the message you're trying to send. You and I both know if you say the words "mayor" or "police", people's hair stand on end. :)

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »